Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 24:3 (2025) ► pp.415–436

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Epistemic stance and public discourse on irregular migration in one of Europe’s outermost regions

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Published online: 29 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22012.dia
Abstract
This article falls within the conceptual framework of critical discourse studies and cognitive linguistics whose attention has focused on the discourse found in the public sphere on the topic of migration. I will demonstrate the results of my analysis of a corpus composed of 74 opinion articles that were published in a Spanish regional newspaper between August 2020 and February 2021. All of them focus on the same issue: the mass arrival of irregular migrants at one of Europe’s outermost borders, the Canary Islands, and the social, political and economic strain that this is generating. The results of this analysis indicate that the periphrastic auxiliary verb poder (can/could/might) constitutes an essential resource for the way in which knowledge is managed by the authors whose intention is to fuel the debate by guiding the conceptualisation of reality of readers who do not have perceptual access to the events described.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1The perifrastic auxiliary poder (can/could/might)
      • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Conclusions
  • References
References (78)
References
Baker, Paul et al.. 2008. “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press”. Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bañón Hernández, Antonio. 2007. “El discurso periodístico a propósito del viaje de los inmigrantes pobres”, In Discursos sobre la inmigración en España. Los medios de comunicación, los parlamentos, y las administraciones, edited by R. Zapata-Barrero and T. A. Van Dijk. 45–68, Barcelona: Fundació CIDOBGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect”. Text 9 (1): 93–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny, and Egbert Fortuin. 2016. “Modality and mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammars”. In The Oxford handbook of Modality and mood, edited by J. Nuyts. and J. Van Der Auwera. 514–659. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buonfino, Alessandra. 2004. “Between unity and plurality: the politicization and securitization of the discourse of immigration in Europe”. New Political Science 26 (1): 23–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burguers, Christian et al.. 2012. “Verbal irony: Differences in usage across written genres”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31 (3): 290–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casero Ripollés, Andreu. 2007. “Discurso mediático, inmigración e ilegalidad: legitimar la exclusión a través de la noticia”. In Discursos sobre la inmigración en España. Los medios de comunicación, los parlamentos, y las administraciones, edited by R. Zapata-Barrero and T. A. Van Dijk. 69–92, Barcelona: Fundació CIDOB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collyer, Michael et al.. 2014. Introduction Transit Migrations and European Spaces. In Transit Migrations in Europa, edited by F. Düvell et al., 1–33. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish (Semi)Auxiliaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 2007. “The stance triangle”. In Stancetaking in discourse. Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, edited by R. Englebretson. 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. “Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign”. Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Analysing political discourse. Rhetoric, discourse, and metaphor. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse Theory and practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser, 2014. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitneva, Stanka. 2001. “Epistemic marking and reliability judgments. Evidence from Bulgarian”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 401–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes, Catalina. 1991. “Adverbios de modalidad”. Verba 181: 275–231.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Miguel, José. 2005. “Verbos aspectuales en español. La interacción de significado verbal y significado construccional”. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Professor Doutor Mário Vilela, edited by G. M. Rio-Torto, et al., 405–418, Porto: Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo. 1999. “Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española Vol. 21, edited by I. Bosque, and V. Demonte. 3323–3390, Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science. New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. “Legitimizing assertions and the logico-rhetorical module: Evidence and epistemic vigilance in media discourse on immigration”. Discourse Studies 13 (6): 751–769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Moving beyond Metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA: Construal Operations in Immigration Discourse”. In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, edited by Ch. Hart. 171–192, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. “Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA”. Discourse Studies 25 (2): 247–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, Bruce. 2001. Ideology, metaphor and iconographic references”. In Language and ideology. Volume II: Descriptive cognitive approaches, edited by R. Dirven et al., 27–50, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1996. “Framing Responsibility for Political Issues”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 5461: 59–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2005. “Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: Evidence from business media discourse”. Discourse & Society 16 (2): 199–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2018. “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Poland”. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16 (1–2): 76–96, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right wing populism”. Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Ruth Wodak. 2018. “The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe”. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1–2): 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald, 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990, Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar”. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Conceptualization, Symbolization, and Grammar”, International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 31–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Modals: Striving for control”. In English Modality. Core, periphery and evidentiality edited by J. Marín-Arrese et al., 3–57, Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Levels of reality. Langages 4 (22).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semántica lingüística. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana. 2011. “Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse. Legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility”. In Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, edited by Ch. Hart. 193–223, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, Lucía. 2000. “enfrentamiento y consenso en los debates parlamentarios sobre la política de inmigración en España”. Oralia 31: 113–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2011. “Migration, media and “deliberate” metaphors”. Metaphorik.de 211: 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (1): 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. “Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 383–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Notions of (inter)subjectivity”. English Text Construction 5 (1): 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Analyses of the modal meanings”. In The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, edited by J. Nuyts, and J. Van Der Auwera. 31–49, Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelyvás, Péter. 2001. “On the development of the category modal: a cognitive view. How changes in image-schematic structure led to the emergence of the grounding predication”. In Wort und (Kon)text, edited by P. Kocsány, and A. Molnár. 103–130, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “On epistemic and deontic grounding”. Argumentum 151: 304–315.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rausis, Frowin. 2023. “Restrictive North versus Permissive South? Revisiting Dominant Narratives on the Evolution of the Refugee Regime”. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Manual. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2008. “Rhetoric of political speeches”. In Handbook of communication in the public sphere, edited by R. Wodak and V. Koller. 243–270, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rheindorf, Markus, and Ruth Wodak. 2018. “Borders, fences, and limits – protecting Austria from refugees: Metadiscursive negotiation of meaning in the current refugee crisis”. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16 (1–2): 15–38, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, José, and Wilben Spooren. 1997. “Perspective, Subjectivity, and Modality from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View. In Discourse and perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by W. Liebert et al., 85–114, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez, Cristina. 1999. “La negación”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española Vol. 21, edited by I. Bosque, and V. Demonte. 2561–2634, Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1999. “Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse”. Discourse & Society, 10 (2): 191–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto, et al. 2020. “’Druggies Drug Dealers Rapists and Killers’. The President’s Verbal Animus against Immigrants”. Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies 45 (2): 15–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1995. “Contextual conditions for the interpretation of ‘poder’ and ‘deber’ in Spanish”. In Modality in grammar and discourse, edited by J. Bybee, and S. Fleischman. 67–106, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simaki, Vasiliki, et al. 2019. “A two-step procedure to identify lexical elements of stance constructions in discourse from political blogs”. Corpora 14 (3): 379–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1982. “Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds”. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics: 484–507Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in language and cognition”. Cognitive Science 121: 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2000. “Ideologies, Racism, Discourse: Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues”. In Comparative Perspectives on Racism, edited by J. Ter Wal, and M. Verkuyten. 92–114, London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001a. “Algunos principios de la teoría del contexto”. ALED, Revista latinoamericana de estudios del discurso 1 (1): 69–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001b. “Critical discourse analysis”. In The handbook of discourse analysis, edited by D. Schiffrin et al., 352–371, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011a. “Discourse, knowledge, power and politics. Towards critical epistemics discourse analysis”. In Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, edited by Ch. Hart. 27–63, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dik, Teun A. 2011b. Sociedad y discurso, Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2014. “Discourse-Cognition-Society. Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse”. In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ch. Hart, and P. Cap. 121–146, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Análisis crítico del discurso”. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales 301: 203–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. “The socio-cognitive discourse studies”. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by J. Flowerdew, and J. Richardson. 26–44, London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2003. “El enfoque histórico del discurso”. In Métodos de análisis crítico del discurso, edited by R. Wodak, and M. Mayer. 101–141, Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA”. Discourse Studies 8 (1): 179–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The contribution of critical linguistics to the analysis of discriminatory prejudices and stereotypes in the language of politics”. In Handbook of communication in the public sphere, edited by R. Wodak and V. Koller. 291–316, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Martin Reisigl. 2001. “Discourse and racism”. In The handbook of discourse analysis, edited by D. Schiffrin et al., 372–397, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zapata-Barrero, Ricard, and Teun A. Van Dijk. 2007. “Introducción: inmigración y discurso”. In Discursos sobre la inmigración en España. Los medios de comunicación, los parlamentos, y las administraciones, edited by R. Zapata-Barrero and T. A. Van Dijk. 9–16, Barcelona: Fundació CIDOB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alemán Pérez, Manuela del Carmen & Goretti García-Morales
2025. migración irregular en la prensa de Canarias: análisis del léxico axiológico y de otros elementos desinformativos. Entreculturas. Revista de Traducción y Comunicación Intercultural :16 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue