Article published In: (De)legitimising EUrope in times of crisis
Edited by Franco Zappettini and Samuel Bennett
[Journal of Language and Politics 21:2] 2022
► pp. 300–319
“We” in the EU: (De) legitimizing power relations and status
The case of the 2019 European elections in Romania
Published online: 11 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21067.bec
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21067.bec
Abstract
The article analyzes how the leaders and the candidates of the main parties in Romania built a European field of
power and subject positions in the context of the 2019 European elections. We adopt the premise that the (re) positioning of these
politicians towards the EU is part of their ongoing strategies of (de) legitimization. In this respect, the study focuses on how
they assign themselves a “European authority” in relation to audiences through their positioning as actors in the field. On the
basis of a mainly critically discursive methodological framework, we analyze a corpus consisting of electoral messages on
Facebook. The research reveals the ways in which the political actors build claims, representations and positionings about the EU
through naturalizing (a) symmetric relations, statuses, and symbolic power hierarchies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Discourse on Europe. Contexts of research
- 3.Methodological design
- 4.Findings
- 5.Conclusions
References
References (51)
Aalberg, Toril, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes De Vreese (eds). 2016. Populist
Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
Angermuller, Johannes. 2014. Poststructuralist
Discourse Analysis: Subjectivity in Enunciative
Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Beciu, Camelia, and Mirela Lazăr. 2018. “Migration
and Country Status: The Rearticulation of Identities through Media
Counter-Discourses.” In Debating Migration as a Public Problem.
National Publics and Transnational Fields, ed. by Camelia Beciu, Mălina Ciocea, Irina Diana Mădroane, and Alexandru I. Cârlan, 41–63. Peter Lang.
. 2020. “Entre
Facebook et Parole Télévisuelle, Quels Recadrages des Enjeux Nationaux et Européens dans l’Espace Politique
Roumain ?” In L’Europe au Défi des Populismes Nationaux: La
Communication Politique Centrifuge des Elections de 2019, ed. by Philippe Maarek, and Nicolas Pélissier, 117–143. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Beciu, Camelia, Irina Diana Mădroane, Alexandru I. Cârlan, and Mălina Ciocea. 2017. “Power
Relations, Agency and Discourse in Transnational Social Fields.” Critical Discourse
Studies 14 (3): 227–235.
Bennett, Samuel. 2019a. “Values
as Tools of Legitimation in EU and UK Brexit
Discourses.” In Discourses of Brexit, ed.
by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 17–32. London: Routledge.
. 2019b. “‘Crisis’
as a Discursive Strategy in Brexit Referendum Campaigns.” Critical Discourse
Studies 16 (4): 449–464.
Bennett, Samuel, Artur Lipiński, Agnieszka Stępińska, David Abadi, Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, et al. 2020. “Populist
Communication on Social Media.” [Research Report] Centre for Social Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Hungary). ffhalshs-02735283f.
Block, Elena, and Ralph Negrine. 2017. “The
Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework.” International Journal of
Communication 111: 178–197.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. “The
Political Field, the Social Science Field, and the Journalistic
Field.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic
Field, ed. by Rodney Benson, and Erik Neveu, 29–48. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bucher, Taina. 2012. “The
Friendship Assemblage: Investigating Programmed Sociality on Facebook.” Television & New
Media 14 (6): 479–493.
Charaudeau, Patrick. 2002. “A
Communicative Conception of Discourse”. Discourse
Studies
4
(3): 301–318.
. 2011. Les
Médias et l’Information: L’Impossible Transparence du Discours. 2nd
ed. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Ina.
Ciocea, Mălina, and Alexandru I. Cârlan. 2012. “Debating
Migration as a Public Problem: Diasporic Stances in Media Discourse.” Romanian Journal of
Communication and Public
Relations 14 (4): 181–201.
Conrad, Maximilian. 2014. Europeans
and the Public Sphere Communication without
Community? Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.
Cramer, Jennifer. 2010. “‘Do
We Really Want to Be like Them?’: Indexing Europeanness through Pronominal Use.” Discourse
&
Society 21 (6): 619–637.
De Vreese, H. Claes, Frank Esser, Toril Aalberg, Carsten Reinemann, and James Stanyer. 2018. “Populism
as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New
Perspective.” International Journal of
Press/Politics 23 (4): 423–438.
Diez, Thomas. 2014. “Setting
the Limits: Discourse and EU Foreign Policy.” Cooperation and
Conflict 49 (3): 319–333.
Fairclough, Norman. 1994. “Conversationalization
of Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer.” In The
Authority of the Consumer. Lancaster University Center for the Study of Cultural Values, ed.
by Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercrombie, 235–49. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman, and Eve Chiapello. 2002. “Understanding
the New Management Ideology: A Transdisciplinary Contribution from Critical Discourse Analysis and New Sociology of
Capitalism.” Discourse and
Society 13 (2): 185–208.
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political
Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London and New York: Routledge.
Fossum, John Erik, Philip Schlesinger, and Geir Ove Kvaerk (eds). 2007. Public
Sphere and Civil Society? Transformations of the European Union. ARENA Report
2. Oslo: ARENA.
Hubé, Nicolas. 2018. “Communiquer
l’Europe, Légitimer l’Europe. Les Enjeux Historiques de l’Opinion Publique pour les Institutions
Européennes.” In Annuaire Français de Relations
Internationales, vol. XIX1, 947–964. Paris: La Documentation française.
Kedves, Ana. 2016. “Discursive
Legitimation in Online Crowdfunding: A Study of Kickstarter Projects Promoting Human
Rights.” Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and
Communication 31: 46–63.
Koerber, Amy, and Lonie McMichael. 2008. “
Qualitative
Sampling Methods: A Primer for Technical Communicators
.” Journal of Business and
Technical
Communication
22
(4): 454–473.
Krzyżanowski, Michal. 2010. The
Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multilevel Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European
Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Larsen, Henrik. 2014. “Discourses
of State Identity and Post-Lisbon National Foreign Policy: The Case of Denmark.” Cooperation
and
Conflict 49 (3): 368–385.
Mădroane, Irina Diana. 2018. “Migrant Identities and
Practices in Media Advocacy Campaigns. The Construction of Claims and
Audiences.” In Debating Migration as a Public Problem. National
Publics and Transnational Fields, ed. by Camelia Beciu, Mălina Ciocea, Irina Diana Mădroane, and Alexandru I. Cârlan, 175–198. Peter Lang.
Mégie, Antoine, and Frédéric Mérand. 2013. “L’Union
Européenne et le Nouvel Equilibre des Puissances.” Politique
européenne 391: 9–21.
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The
Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nanz, Patrizia. 2007. “Multiple
Voices: An Interdiscursive Concept of the European Public
Sphere.” In Public Sphere and Civil Society? Tranformations of the
European Union, ed. by John Erik Fossum, Philip Schlesinger, and Geir Ove Kvaerk, 11–29. ARENA
Report
2. Oslo: ARENA.
Pandelea, Nicoleta. 2020. “Vers
un Populisme Digital? La Construction du Discours Politique dans le Contexte des Elections Européennes de
2019.” In L’Europe au Défi des Populismes Nationaux: La Communication
Politique Centrifuge des Elections de 2019, ed. by Philippe Maarek, and Nicolas Pélissier. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “
Strategies
of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to
Actions
.” Discourse &
Society 22 (6): 781–807.
Rojo Martín, Luisa, and Teun A. Van Dijk. 1997. “‘There
Was a Problem, and It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish
Parliamentary Discourse
.” Discourse &
Society
8
(4): 523–66.
Vaara, Eero. 2014. “Struggles
over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and Their Ideological
Underpinnings.” Discourse &
Society 25 (4): 500–518.
Vaara, Eero, and Philippe Monin. 2010. “
Recursive
Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organizational Action in Mergers and
Acquisitions
.” Organization
Science 21 (1): 3–22.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse
and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing
Immigration – a Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse
Studies 1 (1): 83–119.
Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning
in Media Dialogue. Negotiating Roles in News Interviews. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Witschge, Tamara, C W. Anderson, David Domingo, and Albert Hermida. 2018. “Dealing
with the Mess (We Made): Unraveling Hybridity, Normativity, and Complexity in Journalism
Studies.” Journalism 20 (5): 651–659.
Wodak, Ruth. 2002. “Fragmented
Identities: Redefining and Recontextualizing National
Identity. In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to
Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton, and Chistina Schäffner, 143–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
. 2010. “‘Us’
and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via
Discourse.” In Identity, Belonging and
Migration, ed. by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul R. Jones, 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
. 2018. “Discourse
and European Integration”. KFG Working Paper Series, 86, KollegForschergruppe (KFG) “The
Transformative Power of Europe“. Freie Universität Berlin.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Ford, Elizabeth, Simon Pillinger, Robert Stewart, Kerina Jones, Angus Roberts, Arlene Casey, Katie Goddard & Goran Nenadic
Stancea, Andreea & Madalina Botan
Cheng, Xi
Szabó, Lilla Petronella & Gabriella Szabó
Zappettini, Franco & Samuel Bennett
2022. Reimagining Europe and its (dis)integration. Journal of Language and Politics 21:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
