Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 21:6 (2022) ► pp.867–889

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Framing the political conflict discourse in Chinese media

A case study of Sino-US trade dispute

ORCiD logo with link | Sun Yat-sen University
Published online: 14 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21005.zhu
Abstract
Individuals perceive the real world via interpretive schema, and actively classify and interpret their life experiences into what are defined as frames, to make sense of the world around them. Why certain frames are chosen can be explored from the cognitive and communicative perspective. In this light, this study explores how the Chinese news media frame the coverage on Sino-US trade dispute, discursively legitimizing their ideological stance and action. The case study demonstrates that Chinese media exploit multifarious frames to construct the Chinese national identity, which correspondingly and strategically highlight such frames (Cooperation, Health, Journey) as conform to culture value or render the audience empathy. It is suggested to construct political conflict discourse via strategic choices of appropriate social, moral or cultural frames to reframe the dispute. Chinese media can also deploy agenda-setting to enhance political communication.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Framing theory
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Framing Sino-US trade dispute
    • 4.1Thematic analysis
    • 4.2Surface frames
    • 4.3Deep frames and national identity
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (39)
References
Cacciatore, Michael A., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Shanto Iyengar. 2016. “The End of Framing as we Know it … and the Future of Media Effects.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (1): 7–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Jiyong. 2018. “The Background, Causes, Essence and Chinese Countermeasures of the Sino-US Trade War.” Journal of Wuhan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Ed) 71 (5): 72–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ding, Jianxin, and Wenjing Shen. 2013. “Marginal Discourse Analysis: Some Basic Theoretical Issue.” Foreign Languages and Foreign Language Teaching (4):17–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, Robert. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fatma, Ayesha, and Nalin Bharti. 2019. “Perception vs. Reality: Understanding the US-China trade war.” Transnational Corporations Review 11 (4): 270–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferree, Marx, William Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica [Semantics Notebook] 6 (2): 222–254. [URL]
Fillmore, Charles, Christopher Johnson, and Mariam R. L. Petruck. 2003. “Background to FrameNet.” International Journal of Lexicography 16 (3): 235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamson, William, and Andre Modigliani. 1987. “The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action.” In Research in Political Sociology Vol.31, ed. by Richard Braungart, 137–177. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iqbal, Badar, Nida Rahman, and Jonathan Eliminian. 2019. “The Future of Global Trade in the Presence of the Sino-US Trade War.” Economic and Political Studies 7 (2): 217–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Adam Simon. 1993. “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-setting, Priming and Framing.” Communication Research 20 (3): 365–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 2111: 453–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Sei-Hill, Dietram A. Scheufele, and James Shanahan. 2002. “Think About it this Way: Attribute Agenda-setting Function of the Press and the Public’s Evaluation of a Local Issue.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79 (1): 7–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt, Main: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Whose Freedom: The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st Century Politics With an 18th Century Brain. New York: Viking.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. I: Theoretical Pre- requisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuail, Denis. 2005. Mass Communication Theory (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikheev, Vasily, and Sergey Lukonin. 2019. “China–USA: Multiple Vector of “Trade War”.” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia [Modern Economic Stability] 63(5): 57–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Price, Vincent, David Tewksbury, and Elizabeth Powers. 1997. “Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers’ Cognitive Responses.” Communication Research 24 (5): 481–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trintje Pasma. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vani, Archana. 2020. “Who Will Win from the Trade War? Analysis of the US–China Trade War from a Micro Perspective.” China Economic Journal 13 (3): 376–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2009a. The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Language and Politics.” In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, ed. by Jonathan J. Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak and Tony McEnery, 713–734. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng. 2019. “Engagement on the Defensive: From the Mismatched Grand Bargain to the Emerging US-China Rivalry.” Journal of Contemporary China 281: 501–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Chunman, and Xiaoyu Pu. 2019. “Introduction: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?” Journal of Chinese Political Science 24 (1):1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Cai, Dongman
2025. Zero-sum or Win-win Game?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 23:1 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Cai, Dongman
2025. The evolution of protectionism metaphors in English-language media. Pragmatics and Society DOI logo
Hu, Ying & Hongfei Li
2025. Reframing China in U.S. Trade policy discourse: a context-deictic space model for ideological positioning. Frontiers in Communication 10 DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaoling & Gareth Shaw
2025. Xi–Biden Summit coverage: Chinese media frames for global and domestic readers. Global Media and China 10:2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Jie, Jiajun Tang, Yalong Xiao & Chengzhang Zhu
2024. Persuasion Strategies of the Major Powers on Social Media: An Analysis of the Metadiscourse from the Chinese and American Spokespersons' Tweets. Emerging Media 2:4 ► pp. 698 ff. DOI logo
Gukosyants, O. Yu.
2024. Conflict Accommodation in Internet-Mediated Communication (The Study of Comments for the Livejournal Posts During the COVID-19 Pandemic). Russian Studies in Philology :5 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Gukosyants, O. Yu. & O. A. Alimuradov
2023. TACTICS OF CONFLICT DEVELOPMENT IN INTERNET COMMUNICATION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Russian philology) :1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue