Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:6 (2021) ► pp.932–953

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

US-China trade negotiation discourses in the press

A corpus-driven critical discourse study

 | Jinan University
Published online: 15 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20062.li
Abstract
This article studies trade negotiation discourses during the US-China tariff truce, aiming at investigating the difference of ideologies of the U.S. and China journalists towards trade negotiation. Through integration of theories and methods of corpus linguistics and critical discourse studies and the use of the corpus linguistic software, the study finds that U.S. reports to some extent make itself appear as a victim of the trade, and hope to end unfair trade practices and reduce the chronic trade deficit, while China press focuses more on the harm of raising tariffs not just to each other but the global economy, through communication and dialogue rather than unilateral measures to peacefully resolve trade tensions. Perceived differences in culture have an important influence in the theoretical formation of the differences. The article concludes that the discourse patterns of the coverage imply a rising China and a new level of equilibrium in international politics.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.CDS with a sociocognitive approach
  • 3.CDS and CL in media discourse studies
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Discussion and finding
    • 5.1The most frequently words
    • 5.2The most frequently keywords
    • 5.3The collocates of “trade”
    • 5.4Clusters
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (39)
References
Aluthman, Ebtisam Saleh. 2018. A Corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of the Discursive Representation of Immigration in the EU Referendum Debate. Arab World English Journal 9(4):19–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Augoustinos, Martha, Crabb, Shona, and Shepherd, Richard. 2010. “Genetically Modified Food in the News: Media Representations of the GM Debate in the UK.” Public Understanding of Science 19(1): 98–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, Khosravinik, Majid, Krzyzanowski, Michal, McEnery, Tony and Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 191: 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, and Lam, Phoneix. 2013. “Western Perceptions of Hong Kong Ten Years on: A Corpus-Driven Critical Discourse Study.” Applied Linguistics 34(2):173–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di, Dongsheng, Luft, Gal, and Zhong, Dian. 2019. “Why Did Trump Launch a Trade War? A Political Economy Explanation from the Perspective of Financial Constraints.” Economic and Political Studies-eps 7(2):203–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Efe, Ibrahim, and Ozer, Omer. 2015. “A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis of the Vision and Mission Statements of Universities in Turkey.” Higher Education Research & Development 34(6):1110–1122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1985. “Critical and Descriptive Goals in Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 9(6): 739–763. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse & Society, 4(2):133–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Language and Power. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by van Dijk, Teun A., 258–284. London & Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Yew-Jin. 2001. “Reporting the Same Events? A Critical Analysis of Chinese Print News Media Texts.” Discourse & Society 12(5):585–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 1997. “Competing public discourses in transitional Hong Kong.” Journal of Pragmatics 28(4): 533–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freake, Rachelle, Gentil, Guillaume, and Sheyholislami, Jaffer. 2011. “A Bilingual Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of the Construction of Nationhood and Belonging in Quebec.” Discourse & Society 22(1): 21–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fouilleux, Eve. 2004. “CAP Reforms and Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Another View on Discourse Efficiency.” West European Politics 27(2): 235–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grue, Jan. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Topoi and Mystification: Disability Policy Documents from a Noregian NGO.” Discourse Studies 11(3): 305–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hou, Zhide. 2016. “A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Media Representations of the Chinese Dream.” International Journal of English Linguistics 6(1):142–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itakura, Ken. 2020. “Evaluating the Impact of the U.S.-China Trade War.” Asian Economic Policy Review 15(1): 77–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. 1992. The Interplay of Influence: News, Advertising, Politics and the Mass Media. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-hua, and Nakamura, Mari. 2005. “Translation or Transformation? A Case Study of Language and Ideology in the Taiwanese Press.” Discourse and Society 16(3): 393–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marston, Greg. 2000. “Metaphor, Morality and Myth: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Public Housing Policy in Queensland.” Critical Social Policy 20(3): 349–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2007. “Mining Large Corpora for Social Information: The Case of Elderly.” Language in Society 36(1): 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Regan, Veronica, and Riordan, Elaine. 2018. “Comparing the Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrants in the Irish and UK Press.” Journal of Language and Politics 17(6):744–768. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Priest, Susanna Hornig. 2006. “The Public Opinion Climate for Gene Technologies in Canada and the United States: Competing Voices, Contrasting Frames.” Public Understanding of Science 15(1):55–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowe, Gene, Horlick-Jones, Tom, Walls, John, and Pidgeon, Nick. 2005. “Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public Debate About Transgenic Crops.” Public Understanding of Science 14(4): 331–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2019. WordSmith Tools Version 7.0. UK: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1994. “Grammar, Text, and Ideology: Computer-Assisted Methods in the Linguistics of Representation.” Applied Linguistics 15(2): 201–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarasheva, Elena. 2011. “The Place of Eastern European Researchers in International Discourse: Critical Discourse Analysis Applied to Corpora from Specialized Journals.” Discourse & Society 22(2): 190–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Sandra. 2004. “Researching Educational Policy and Change in ‘New Times’: Using Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Education Policy 19(4): 433–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teo, Peter. 2000. “Racism in the News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in Two Australian Newspapers.” Discourse & Society 11(1):7–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse 1 (1), 17–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Discourse and Power. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015a. Critical Discourse Analysis (new version). In Handbook of Discourse Analysis Second Edition, ed. by Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi, and Schiffrin, Deborah. vol.11, 466–485. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach (new version). In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis Third Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer, 62–85. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Yan. 2019. “Power of Discourse in Free Trade Agreement Negotiation.” Leiden Journal of International Law 32(3): 437–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Rorden. 2009. “Language, Power and Multilateral Trade Negotiations.” Review of International Political Economy 16(4): 597–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Hu, Ying & Hongfei Li
2025. Reframing China in U.S. Trade policy discourse: a context-deictic space model for ideological positioning. Frontiers in Communication 10 DOI logo
Ye, Meng & Eric Friginal
2024. Portrayals of Chinese companies in American and British economic news tweets during China’s macroeconomic transitions 2007–2023. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Ye, Meng & Eric Friginal
2025. Framing ‘economic rival’? Targeted attitudes toward Chinese companies in The Wall Street Journal’s English and Chinese editions of economic news. Corpora 20:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Bixi
2023. A Topic-Modelling-Assisted Discourse Study of DiDi’s Delisting from the New York Stock Exchange in Anglo-American Media Coverage. Critical Arts 37:6 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Song, Jiannan
2021. Appraising with Metaphors: A Case Study of the Strategic Ritual for Invoking Journalistic Emotions in News Reporting of the China–US Trade Disputes. Critical Arts 35:5-6 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Song, Jiannan
2024. Representing state identity with journalistic attitudes: a corpus-assisted linguistic analysis of CGTN’s trade disputes coverage. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 100 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue