Article published In: Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 95–111
Critical fantasy studies
Published online: 14 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20052.gly
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20052.gly
Abstract
Many scholars have drawn attention to the affective power that aspects of discourse and practice exert in our social and political life. Fantasy is a concept that, like structures of feeling, rhetoric, myth, metaphor, and utopia, has generated illuminating explanatory and interpretive insights with which to better understand the operation of this power. In this piece I argue that there are distinctive virtues in affirming the value of the category of fantasy, from a theoretical point of view. Importantly, however, I also argue that the qualification ‘critical’ in Critical Fantasy Studies captures something about how such studies can draw out the normative, ideological, and politico-strategic implications of psychoanalytic insights and observations, and thus become part of a broader enterprise in critical theoretical and empirical research.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Critical fantasy studies as a frontier of post-Marxist discourse theory
- 3.Fantasy and/in post-Marxist discourse theory
- 4.Questions of theory: Fantasy & enjoyment
- 5.Questions of critique: Normative and ideological critique
- 6.Concluding caveat: Not all that is not conscious is unconscious
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (33)
Best, Beverley, Werner Bonefeld, and Chris O’Kane, eds. 2018. The Sage Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory. London: Sage.
Billig, Michael. 1997. “‘Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages.” In The Message of Social Psychology, edited by Craig McGarty and Alexander Haslam, 36–53. Oxford: Blackwell.
Caspi, Tair. 2018. “Towards psychoanalytic contribution to linguistic metaphor theory.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 99 (5): 1186–1211.
Chang, Wei-Yuan, and Jason Glynos. 2011. “Ideology and Politics in the Popular Press: The Case of the 2009 UK MP’s Expenses Scandal.” in Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics, edited by Lincoln Dahlberg and Sean Phelan, 106–127. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Finlayson, Alan. 2012. “Rhetoric and the Political Theory of Ideologies.” Political Studies 60 (4): 751–67.
Glynos, Jason. 2010. “Lacan at Work.” In Lacan and Organization, edited by Carl Cederstrom and Casper Hoedemaeker, 13–58. MayFly Books.
. 2011. “On the Ideological and Political Significance of Fantasy in the Organization of Work.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 16 (4): 373–393.
. 2014. “Death, Fantasy, And The Ethics Of Mourning.” In The Social Construction of Death Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Edited by Leen Van Brussel and Nico Carpentier, 137–160. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Glynos, Jason and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Glynos, Jason, Joanildo Burity, and Gustavo Oliveira. 2019. “Critical Fantasy Studies: Neoliberalism, Education, Identification.” Serie-Estudos 24 (52): 145–170.
Glynos, Jason and Savvas Voutyras. 2016. “Ideology as Blocked Mourning: Greek National Identity in Times of Economic Crisis and Austerity.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21 (3): 201–224.
Glynos, Jason and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2004. “Encounters of the Real Kind: Sussing Out the Limits of Laclau’s Embrace of Lacan.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, edited by Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, 110–128. London: Routledge.
. 2004. “Glimpsing the Future: A Reply.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, edited by Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, 279–328. London: Routledge.
Lapping, Claudia and Jason Glynos. 2019. “‘Two for joy’ – Towards a better understanding of free associative methods as sites of transference in empirical research.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 24 (4): 432–451.
. 2016. “Capturing Desire: Rhetorical Strategies and the Affectivity of Discourse.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (1): 143–160.
Morelock, Jeremiah, ed. 2018. Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism. London: University of Westminster Press.
Parker, Ian. 2010. “Psychosocial studies: Lacanian discourse analysis negotiating interview text.” Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 15 (2): 156–172.
Cited by (33)
Cited by 33 other publications
Eklundh, Emmy & Sebastián Ronderos
Eriksson, Madeleine, Anna Sofia Lundgren & Rikard H Eriksson
Feine, Julia Maria Charlotte & Ayşem Mert
Hurtado Hurtado, Joshua & Jason Glynos
Hurtado Hurtado, Joshua, Vilma Hämäläinen, Toni Ruuska & Pasi Heikkurinen
Lounela, Emilia, Shane Murphy & Ümit Bedretdin
Mondon, Aurelien
Monteiro, Bianca Alighieri Luz
Nunarnan, Omar
Yates, Alex & Aurelien Mondon
Hawkins, Benjamin & May CI van Schalkwyk
Mayblin, Lucy, Joe Turner, Thom Davies, Tesfalem Yemane & Arshad Isakjee
McMillan, Chris
Sánchez, Gustavo
Sánchez, Gustavo
Tervasmäki, Tuomas
Zienkowski, Jan
2024. Poststructuralist discourse theory. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 187 ff.
Abbasi, Amir Zaib, Natasha Ayaz, Sana Kanwal, Mousa Albashrawi & Nadine Khair
De Groot Heupner, Susan
Kaminskas, Dominykas
Remling, Elise
Ronderos, Sebastián & Jason Glynos
Roslyng, Mette Marie & Camilla Dindler
Bal, Matthijs & Andy Brookes
Lindberg, Jens & Anna Sofia Lundgren
Loucas, Emily
Loucas, Emily
Ronderos, Sebastián & Daniel Marín-López
Telleria, Juan & Jorge Garcia-Arias
Zicman de Barros, Thomàs
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
