Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 47–61

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Discourse, concepts, ideologies

Pausing for thought

 | University of Oxford
Published online: 14 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20051.fre
Abstract
Two branches of discourse studies, critical discourse analysis (CDA) and discourse theory (DT), could benefit through extending their critical focus and incorporating findings and methodologies of neighbouring disciplines. While indebted to the attentiveness of CDA to ordinary language, ideology studies have by contrast developed interpretative, non-judgmental analytical frameworks that explore the many-faceted features of ideology, power, and the political. In turn, the macro-focus of DT on binary distinctions, articulatory equivalences, and the construction of hegemony through empty signifiers, overlooks the complex internal conceptual morphology that produces multiple ideological vocabularies. Through a layered filtering of texts, utterances, and linguistic intensities, ideological micro-morphology reveals processes of semantic decontestation in order to defend, alter or criticize political thought-practices. It illuminates the complex interrelationship between word and concept and accepts fantasies as ineluctable and decodable features of communal life. By reaching out beyond their disciplinary confines, the interplay of these parallel approaches could enrich the scholarly understanding of the political.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Beyond the pejorative
  • 3.Re-engaging with the political
  • 4.The grip of Laclau
  • 5.Narrowing the divides
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (30)
References
Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2007. “Bringing Discourse Theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 61: 266–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. 2006. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies 111: 211–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
d’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post Truth. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and Power, 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flinders, Matthew, and Matt Wood. 2018. “Discursive Depoliticisation and Political Disengagement.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner, 603–617. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Professional Responsibilities of the Political Theorist.” In Liberalism as Ideology: Essays in Honour of Michael Freeden, edited by Ben Jackson and Marc Stears, 259–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The Political Theory of Political Thinking: The Anatomy of a Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Ideologiekritik – A Critique.” In Postcolonial Texts and Contexts, edited by Katja Sarkowsky & Mark Stein, 15–29. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael, Lyman Tower Sargent, and Marc Stears, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael, Javier Fernández-Sebastián, and Jörn Leonhard, eds. 2019. In Search of European Liberalisms: Concepts, Languages, Ideologies. Berghahn: New York and Oxford. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason. 2001. “The Grip of Ideology: a Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 61: 191–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, Robin Klimecki, and Hugh Willmott. 2015. “Logics in Policy and Practice: A Critical Nodal Analysis of the UK Banking Reform Process.” Critical Policy Studies 9(4): 393–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David, ed. 2015. Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laycock, David, ed. 2019. Political Ideology in Parties, Policy, and Civil Society: Interdisciplinary Insights. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Rivas, Rafael, and Irene Lanzas Zotes. 2020. “Tres Approximaciones Teóricas a Los Discursos Polítocos: Concepto, Significante y Argumento.” Revista de Estudios Politicos 1881: 41–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1980. The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Martyn P. 1993. “Reception Theory and the Interpretation of Historical Meanings.” History and Theory 321: 248–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trencsényi, Balázs, Michal Kopeček, Luka Lisjak Gabrijelčič, Maria Falina, Mónika Baár, and Maciej Janowski. 2018. A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe, vol. II1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd revised edition). London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts & Yannis Stavrakakis
2025. Discourse theory and the turn to practice. Journal of Language and Politics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rosales, José María
2025. The awkward rhetoric of Spanish liberalism. Journal of Language and Politics 24:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Sultan, Anang Santoso & Gatut Susanto
2025. From ecology to ideology: How Indonesian textbooks frame environtmental responsibility. Multidisciplinary Science Journal 8:4 ► pp. 2026270 ff. DOI logo
Copeland, Paul & Marzia Maccaferri
2023. The UK, the EU, and COVID-19: Media reporting, the recontextualisation of Eurosceptic discourse, and the fait accompli of Brexit. Politics 43:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Roslyng, Mette Marie & Camilla Dindler
2023. Media power and politics in framing and discourse theory. Communication Theory 33:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Koval, Nadiia, Volodymyr Kulyk, Mykola Riabchuk, Kateryna Zarembo & Marianna Fakhurdinova
2022. Morphological Analysis of Narratives of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict in Western Academia and Think-Tank Community. Problems of Post-Communism 69:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Maccaferri, Marzia
2022. Populism and Italy: a theoretical and epistemological conundrum. Modern Italy 27:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Maccaferri, Marzia & George Newth
2022. The delegitimisation of Europe in a pro-European country. Journal of Language and Politics 21:2 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Phelan, Sean
2022. Friends, enemies, and agonists: Politics, morality and media in the COVID-19 conjuncture. Discourse & Society 33:6 ► pp. 744 ff. DOI logo
Zappettini, Franco
2022. Taking the left way out of Europe. Journal of Language and Politics 21:2 ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Hegemony, Discourse, and Political Strategy [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 97], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue