Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp.226–253

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Animals vs. armies

Resistance to extreme metaphors in anti-immigration discourse

ORCiD logo with link | Lancaster University
Published online: 10 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20032.har
Abstract
Within the emerging paradigm of experimental Critical Discourse Analysis, this paper investigates the framing effects of dehumanising vs militarising metaphors in anti-immigration discourses. These metaphors are characterised as ‘extreme metaphors’ in so far as they are manifestly metaphorical and obviously inflammatory. Attested examples of these metaphors in political and media discourses are identified and critically analysed before their potential framing effects are investigated experimentally.
Contrary to predictions, alternative metaphors did not increase support for actions and evaluations consistent with the unique framings that they present. In fact, extreme metaphors decreased support for anti-immigration sentiments and hostile immigration policies compared to literal framings. It seems that extreme metaphors alert readers to the metaphorical framing being presented so that, among certain groups of people, the framing is more readily scrutinised and rejected, prompting readers adopt more sympathetic attitudes toward immigration. The implications of these findings for Critical Discourse Analysis are discussed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction/background
  • 2.Critical metaphor analysis and the metaphor framing effect
  • 3.Experiment
    • 3.1Methods
      • 3.1.1Participants and design
      • 3.1.2Materials and procedure
      • 3.1.3Measures
    • 3.2Results
    • 3.3Discussion
      • Issues and limitations
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Behrend, Tara S., David J. Sharek, Adam W. Meade, and Eric N. Weibe. 2011. “The Viability of Crowdsourcing for Survey Research.” Behaviour Research Methods 431: 800–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen. 2017. “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review”. Metaphor and Symbol 32 (2): 118–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buhrmester, Michael, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catalano, Theresa and Andreas Musolff. 2019. “‘Taking the Shackles off’: Metaphor and Metonymy of Migrant Children and Border Officials in the U.S”. Metaphorik.de 291.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Jesse, Pam Mueller, and Gabriele Paolacci. 2014. Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers: Consequences and Solutions for Behavioral Researchers. Behavior Research Methods 46(1): 112–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign. Discourse & Society 17(5): 563–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: The Case of Mein Kampf.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, edited by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 15–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crump, Matthew J. C., John V. McDonnel, and Todd M. Gureckis. 2013. “Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioural Research.” PLoS ONE 8 e57410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeVellis, Robert F. 2012. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Lavalette, Kiki Y. R., Conia Andone, and Gerard J. Steen. 2019a. “Figurative Analogies and How They are Resisted in British Public Bill Committee Debates.” Metaphor and the Social World 9(1): 107–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Refaie, Elizabeth. 2001. “Metaphors We Discriminate by: Naturalized Themes in Austrian Newspaper Articles about Asylum Seekers.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3): 352–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Understanding Visual Metaphor: The Example of Newspaper Cartoons.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 75–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward a Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ethical Journalism Network. 2015. Moving Stories. International Review of How Media Cover Migration. London: Ethical Journalism Network.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by Linguistics Society of Korea, 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica VI (2): 222–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo and Christopher Hart. 2018. “Trust-Building Strategies in Corporate Discourse: An Experimental Study. Discourse & Society 29(5): 514–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flusberg, Stephen J., Mark Lauria, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2018. “Metaphor Framing in Multiple Communication Modalities. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 374–79. Madison, WI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giese, Stephanie and Christian Baden. 2014. “Putting the Image back into the Frame: Modelling the Linkage between Visual Communication and Frame-Processing Theory.” Communication Theory 25(1): 46–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1990. “Seeing is Remembering: How Visuals Contribute to Learning from Television News. Journal of Communication 40 (3): 134–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Metaphor and Intertextuality in Media Framings of the (1984–85) British Miners’ Strike: A Multimodal Analysis.” Discourse & Communication 11(1): 3–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. “‘Riots Engulfed the City’: An Experimental Study Investigating the Legitimating Effects of Fire Metaphors in Discourses of Disorder.” Discourse & Society 29(3): 279–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. “Event-Frames Affect Blame Assignment and Perception of Aggression: An Experimental Case Study in CDA.” Applied Linguistics 39(3): 400–421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher and Matteo Fuoli. 2020. “Objectification Strategies Outperform Subjectification Strategies in Military Interventionist Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 1621: 17–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartman, Todd K. 2012. “Toll Booths on the Information Superhighway? Policy Metaphors in the Case of Net Neutrality.” Political Communication 29(3): 278–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, David J., Pheobe C. Ellsworth, and Richard Gonzalez. 2018. “Are Manipulation Checks Necessary?” Frontiers in Psychology 91: 998. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeffries, Stuart. 2014. “‘Swamped’ and ‘Riddled’: The Toxic Words that Wreck Public Discourse.” Guardian, Octoboer 27, 2014. [URL]
Kampf, Zohar and Yossi David. 2019. “Too Good to Be True: The Effect of Conciliatory Message Design on Compromising Attitudes in Intractable Conflicts.” Discourse & Society 30(3): 264–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Richard A., Kate A. Ratliff, Michelangelo Vianello, Reginald B. Adams Jr., Štěpán Bahnik, Michael J. Bernstein, Konrad Bocian et al. 2014. “Investigating Variation in Replicability.” Social Psychology 451: 142–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal. 2018. “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 76–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 503–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Mark J., Daniel Sullivan, and Jeff Greenberg. 2009. “Evidence that Self-Relevant Motives and Metaphoric Framing Interact to Influence Political and Social Attitudes.” Psychological Science 20 (11): 1421–1426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, Allan. 2002. “Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual review of Applied Linguistics 22(1): 96–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, Winter and Siddharth Suri. 2012. “Conducting Behavioural Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Behavioural Research Methods 441: 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ofcom. 2014. News Consumption in the UK: 2014 Report. [URL]
Paolacci, Gabriele, Jesse Chandler, and Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis. 2010. “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Judgement and Decision Making 51: 411–419.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peer, Eyal, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 701: 153–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr, and Gerard J. Steen. 2015. “How Viruses and Beasts Affect our Opinions (or Not): The Role of Extendedness in Metaphorical Framing.” Metaphor and the Social World 5(2): 245–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robins, Shani and Richard E. Mayer. 2000. “The Metaphor Framing Effect: Metaphorical Reasoning about Text-Based Dilemmas.” Discourse Processes 30 (1): 57–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1999. “‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-Immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.” Discourse & Society 10(2): 191–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shariatmadari, David. 2015. “Swarms, Floods and Marauders: The Toxic Metaphors of the Migration Debate.” Guardian, August 10, 2015. [URL]
Steen, Gerard J. 2008. “The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol 231: 213–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “When is Metaphor Deliberate?” In Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival, edited by Nils-Lennart Johannesson, Christina Alm-Arvius, and David C. Minugh, 43–63. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., W. Gudrun Reijnierse, and Christian Burgers. 2014. “When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013).” PLoS ONE 9(12): e113536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Subtirelu, Nicholas C. and Shakthidhar R. Gopavaram. 2016. “Crowdsourcing Critical Discourse Analysis: Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to Explore Readers’ Uptake of Comments about Language on RateMyProfessors.com.” CADAAD 8 (1): 38–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. 2016. “Extended Metaphors are the Home Runs of Persuasion: Don’t Fumble the Phrase.” Metaphor and Symbol 31 (2): 53–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors We Think with: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 6(2): e16782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 8(1): e52961. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Borodistky. 2015. “Measuring Effects of Metaphor in a Dynamic Opinion Landscape.” PLoS ONE 10(7): e0133939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utych, Stephen M. 2018. “How Dehumanization Influences Attitudes toward Immigrants.” Political Research Quarterly 7(2): 440–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, Andy T., Carlos Velasco, Carmel A. Levitan, Xiaoang Wan, and Charles Spence. 2015. “Conducting Perception Research over the Internet: A Tutorial Review.” Peer J 3 e1058. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
YouGov. 2018. Where the Public Stands on Immigration. [URL]
Cited by (33)

Cited by 33 other publications

Alemán Pérez, Manuela del Carmen & Goretti García-Morales
2025. migración irregular en la prensa de Canarias: análisis del léxico axiológico y de otros elementos desinformativos. Entreculturas. Revista de Traducción y Comunicación Intercultural :16 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Díaz-Peralta, Marina
2025. Epistemic stance and public discourse on irregular migration in one of Europe’s outermost regions. Journal of Language and Politics 24:3 ► pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
PERALTA, MARINA DÍAZ
2025. Centenary Paper: Estrategias persuasivas en el discurso público sobre la migración irregular: la expresión de la posibilidad radical. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 102:9 ► pp. 901 ff. DOI logo
Laura Filardo-Llamas & Lorena Pérez-Hernández
2025. Metaphors of resistance in the counter-discourse of Spanish, English and Dutch cycling activists. Russian Journal of Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Iorga, Mihaela
2025. Metaphors of Migration in the Romanian and the British Press. In Narratives of Immigration in the EU, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yufeng & Dechao Li
2025. Metaphors and China’s COVID-19 policies: a diachronic analysis of Chinese-English bilingual news editorials. Text & Talk DOI logo
O’Connell Davidson, Julia
2025. Thinking with space invaders: ‘Freed slaves’, ‘asylum seekers’ and social wastelands. European Journal of Cultural Studies 28:5 ► pp. 1302 ff. DOI logo
Andreasen, Søren Mosgaard
2024. The shadow drama. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Assimakopoulos, Stavros & Anna Piata
2024. Liquid racism, metaphor and the visual modality. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Figurativeness of the Japanese flag. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Ertanir, Beyhan, Alan Meca, Cory Cobb, Ingrid Zeledon, Jennifer B. Unger, Elma Lorenzo‐Blanco, Pablo Montero‐Zamora, Byron L. Zamboanga, Lourdes Baezconde‐Garbanati, Daniel W. Soto, Dilan Aksoy, Wassilis Kassis, Maria Duque, Aigerim Alpysbekova & Seth J. Schwartz
2024. Disentangling the directionality among cultural stressors and psychosocial outcomes in recently immigrated Hispanic families: A random intercept cross‐lagged panel model approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence 34:4 ► pp. 1517 ff. DOI logo
Flusberg, Stephen J., Kevin J. Holmes, Paul H. Thibodeau, Robin L. Nabi & Teenie Matlock
2024. The Psychology of Framing: How Everyday Language Shapes the Way We Think, Feel, and Act. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 25:3 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Gonçalves, Isabella
2024. Promoting Hate Speech by Dehumanizing Metaphors of Immigration. Journalism Practice 18:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Höhn, Sviatlana
2024. The case of romantic relationships: analysis of the use of metaphorical frames with ‘traditional family’ and related terms in political Telegram posts in three countries and three languages. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Ying & Dennis Tay
2024. Use of Offensive Animal Metaphor as an Interactional Activity in Online Forum Discussions. Metaphor and Symbol 39:4 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Krockow, Eva M., Meghann Jones, Carolyn Tarrant, Marc Mendelson & Stephen J. Flusberg
2024. Risk communication about antimicrobial resistance: a content analysis of metaphor use in global public discourse. Journal of Risk Research 27:12 ► pp. 1605 ff. DOI logo
Coschignano, Serena, Gosse Minnema & Chiara Zanchi
2023. Explaining the distribution of implicit means of misrepresentation: A case study on Italian immigration discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 213 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2023. Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA. Discourse Studies 25:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2024. Multimodal meaning making in news communication about immigration: using the NewsScape corpus to explore co-verbal images in TV news. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2025. Using generative AI to investigate the multimodal representation of refugees and migrants. Discourse & Society DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2023. Introduction. In Incels and Ideologies [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
List, Alexandra
2023. Social justice reasoning when students learn about social issues using multiple texts. Discourse Processes 60:4-5 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Gerard J.
2023. Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zhang, Yan & Wenxing Yang
2023. The landslide’s conceptualizing economic decline and its framing effect: Mandarin evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zhang, Yan & Wenxing Yang
2025. Landslide metaphor: a cross-linguistic examination. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1 DOI logo
Benczes, Réka & Bence Ságvári
2022. Migrants are not welcome. Journal of Language and Politics 21:3 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Jatileni, Cloneria Nyambali & Shemunyenge Taleiko Hamukwaya
2022. The Use of Animal Metaphors to Reveal Beliefs of Grade Three Namibian Learners Who Experienced Mathematics Learning Difficulties During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Mathematics Education in Africa, ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Porto, M. Dolores
2022. Water Metaphors and Evaluation of Syrian Migration: The Flow of Refugees in the Spanish Press. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
GIBBS, RAYMOND W. & JOSIE SIMAN
2021. How We Resist Metaphors. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 670 ff. DOI logo
Meluzzi, Chiara, Erica Pinelli, Elena Valvason & Chiara Zanchi
2021. Responsibility attribution in gender-based domestic violence: A study bridging corpus-assisted discourse analysis and readers' perception. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Voices of Supporters [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 101], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Evaluative Discourse Metaphor in Online Communities [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue