Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:4 (2021) ► pp.563–584

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse

Constructing the ethos of the receptive politician

ORCiD logo with link | University of Leipzig
Published online: 1 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20018.tru
Abstract
This paper puts forward an argument about the relation between narratives and constructed dialogue in political discourse. Narratives of dialogue are special cases of constructed dialogue that emphasize the embeddedness of the speaker, displayed as a discourse participant engaging in a conversation with an ordinary citizen or a public figure. Close analysis of British, German, and French parliamentary debates reveals how narratives of dialogue shape an image of the speaker involved in a dialogue. While being engaged in the activity of debating, parliamentarians simultaneously perform the act of debating. I argue that the main point of narratives of dialogue is not so much to report on a prior or hypothetical situation, but to create the ethos of a Member of Parliament receptive to their interlocutors.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Bringing constructed dialogue and narratives together
  • 3.Collecting and annotating quotes from a corpus of parliamentary debates
  • 4.Indeterminate voices: Establishing a dialogue with the opponents
  • 5.Well-known voices: Displaying the professional politician
  • 6.Singular anonymous voices: Talking to the ordinary voter
  • 7.Conclusion: Narratives of dialogue in the service of ethos of familiarity and authenticity
  • Notes
  • References
References (35)
References
Amossy, Ruth. 2001. “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology.” Poetics Today 22 (1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text & Talk 28 (3): 377–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baynam, Mike, and Stef Slembrouck. 2009. “Speech Representation and Institutional Discourse.” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 19 (4): 439–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bischof, Karin, and Cornelia Ilie. 2018. “Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (5): 585–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2010. “Face, Facework and Political Discourse.” Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 23 (2): 155–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin, and Kornelia Pape, eds. 2000. Sprache des deutschen Parlamentarismus. Studien zu 150 Jahren parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia L. 2005. “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 16 (4): 481–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2012. “Quotations in monologic and dialogic political discourse.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups Across Discourse Domains: a Cross-Cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, 72–86. Universität Würzburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull. 2012. “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23 (2): 127–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman. 2018. “‘What I Would Say to John and Everyone like John Is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29 (5): 495–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heiden, Serge. 2010. “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme.” In 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, edited by Ryo Otoguro, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Umemoto, Kei Yoshimoto, and Yasunari Harada, 389–98. Institute for Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Development, Waseda University. [URL]
Holt, Elizabeth. 2009. “Reported Speech.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen. 2016. “Parliament as a Conceptual Nexus.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of a European Concept, 1–16. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 71–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Parliamentary Discourses.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, edited by Keith Brown, 2nd ed., 188–97. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kranert, Michael. 2017. “‘Today I Offer You, and We Offer the Country a New Vision’: The Strategic Use of First Person Pronouns in Party Conference Speeches of the Third Way.” Discourse & Society 28 (2): 182–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. “Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse Studies 3 (2): 181–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Studies in Black English Vernacular. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryfe, David M. 2006. “Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 34 (1): 72–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, and Mick Short. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, edited by Florian Coulmas, 311–32. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truan, Naomi. 2016a. “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Assemblée Nationale (2002–2012) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and Tools for LANGuage). [URL]
. 2016b. “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Deutscher Bundestag (1998–2015) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL]
. 2016c. “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the House of Commons (1998–2015) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL]
. 2016d. “« Les citations doivent être exactes ! ». Pratiques polémiques de la citation au parlement.” Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, 32. [URL]
. 2019a. “Talking about, for, and to the People: Populism and Representation in Parliamentary Debates on Europe.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67 (3): 307–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. “The Discursive Construction of the People in European Political Discourse: Semantics and Pragmatics of a Contested Concept in German, French, and British Parliamentary Debates.” In Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist Discourses across the Political Spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze, 831: 201–28. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. forthcoming. The Politics of Person Reference. Third-person forms in English, German, and French. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2016. “I hope you don’t mind me quoting you”: Narrative reports in the service of (de)legitimisation. In Janusz Badio (ed.), Events and Narratives in Language (Lodz Studies in Language), vol. 521, 205–221. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Cramer, Peter
2025. Voiced illustrations: The use of constructed voices in the study of argument. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Prior, Alex, Samuel Johnson-Schlee & Ryan Swift
2025. Go-along research in the UK Parliament. Political Geography 123 ► pp. 103424 ff. DOI logo
Wan, Tsung‐Lun Alan
2025. Indexing Power Through Self‐Reference: Electoral Margins and the Use of Běnxí Among Taiwanese Parliamentarians. Journal of Sociolinguistics DOI logo
Zhao, Xuechun
2024. The Multiple Pragmatic Identity Construction of Huckleberry Finn in Adventures of Huckleberry Finn from Contextual Correlates of Adaptability. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences 4:8 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2023. Dialogue and dialogic perspectives on actions, interactions and practices across contexts. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue