Cover not available

In:Studying Identity: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges
[Journal of Language and Politics 2:2] 2003
► pp. 333–360

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Miscellaneous

Right/left in the context of new political frontiers

What’s radical politics today?

 | Roskilde University
Published online: 18 November 2003
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.2.09dyr
The modern political distinction between right and left has functioned as the symbolic structuring of democratic politics. The significance of this political code lies in the institutionalisation of political discourse as relatively autonomous in relation to cultural and religious discourses in which right as a general rule has been conceived as positive and left as negative. Modern political revolutions marked the transformation of RIGHT/LEFT from a cultural and religious codex of domination/subordination to a political one of parity, which cleared a space for the legitimacy of opposition and disagreement as well as for public reason and the balancing of judgement. RIGHT/LEFT is thus associated with a political symbolic order that underpins the autonomy of democratic politics by signifying the distinction between parties of equal political status.
References (32)
References
Bienfait, H. F. and Beek, W. E. A. 2002. Right and Left as Political Categories: an Exercise in “not-so-primitive” Classification. Anthropos 96(1), 2001, 169–179.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 1987. The Future of Democracy: Towards a General Theory of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Liberalism and Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristi, Renato. 1998. Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyrberg, Torben Bech. 2000. Racisme som en nationalistisk og populistisk reaktion på elitedemokrati. In: Torben Bech Dyrberg, Allan Dreyer Hansen and Jacob Torfing (eds). Diskursanalysen på arbejde. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag, 221–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etzioni-Halevy, Eva. 1993. The Elite Connection. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Elites, Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in Ultramodern Society. International Review of Sociology 91, 239–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 1999. Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hertz, Robert. 1973. The Pre-eminence of the Right Hand: A Study in Religious Polarity. In: Rodney Needham (ed.). Right and Left: Essays in Dual Symbolic Classification. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 3–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1994. Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?. In: Jeffrey Weeks (ed.). The Lesser Evil and the Greater Good, London: Rivers Oram Press, 167–179.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000 Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In: Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Zizek. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laponce, J. A. 1981. Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perception. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey. 1973. Right and Left in Greek Philosophy. In: Rodney Needham (ed.). Right and Left: Essays in Dual Symbolic Classification. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 167–187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1990. Radical Democracy or Liberal Democracy?. Socialist Review 20(2), 57–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. The Return of the Political, London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995a. Politics, Democratic Action, and Solidarity. Inquiry 38(1–2), 99–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995b. Democracy and Pluralism: A Critique of the Rationalist Approach. Cardozo Law Review 16(5), 1533–1546.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995c. The End of Politics and the Rise of the Radical Right. Dissent, Fall, 498–503.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Decision, Deliberation, and Democratic Ethos. Philosophy Today 41(1), 24–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. The Radical Centre: A Politics without Adversary. Soundings 91, 11–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998a. The End of Politics?. Interview with Chantal Mouffe. New Times online, Issue 141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002a. Midten fremmer højrefløjen. Interview with Chantal Mouffe. Information, 18. February.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002b. Centrum-venstre mangler lidenskab. Interview with Chantal Mouffe. Politiken, 31. August.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkin, Robert. 1996. The Dark Side of Humanity. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puhovski, Zarko. 1994. The Moral Basis of Political Restructuring. In: Chris Brown (ed.). Political Restructuring in Europe. London and New York: Routledge, 201–221.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Østergård, Uffe. 1989. Politikkens arena: Opståen, udvikling, afvikling?. In: Hans Fink (ed.). Arenaer — om politik og iscenesættelse. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 23–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Karavasilis, Lazaros
2025. What we talk about when we talk about ‘the elite’ in populism studies: re-examining an often-neglected term in the cases of Die Linke and AfD. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin & Juan Alberto Ruiz Casado
2024. Populism of the Privileged: On the Use of Underdog Identities by Comparatively Privileged Groups. Political Studies 72:3 ► pp. 1005 ff. DOI logo
Scanni, Francesco Maria
2024. Populism and the New Radical Right: A Necessary Distinction. Social Epistemology ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Seongcheol
2023. Between autonomy and representation: toward a post-foundational discourse analytic framework for the study of horizontality and verticality. Critical Discourse Studies 20:4 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Rodi, Patricia, Lazaros Karavasilis & Leonardo Puleo
2023. When nationalism meets populism: examining right-wing populist & nationalist discourses in the 2014 & 2019 European parliamentary elections. European Politics and Society 24:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Sunnercrantz, Liv & Tevfik Murat Yildirim
2022. The Role of Experts in Populist Politics: Toward a Post-foundational Approach. In Populism and Science in Europe, ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin, Benjamin Moffitt, Panos Panayotu & Yannis Stavrakakis
2020. The Potentials and Difficulties of Transnational Populism: The Case of the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25). Political Studies 68:1 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos & Aurelien Mondon
2018. Critical research on populism: Nine rules of engagement. Organization 25:5 ► pp. 649 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin & Yannis Stavrakakis
2017. Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism. Javnost - The Public 24:4 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Katsambekis, Giorgos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2017. Revisiting the Nationalism/Populism Nexus: Lessons from the Greek Case. Javnost - The Public 24:4 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Ceron, Andrea
2015. Changing politics, changing language. Journal of Language and Politics 14:4 ► pp. 528 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin
2015. “Flemish Friends, Let us Separate!”: The Discursive Struggle for Flemish Nationalist Civil Society in the Media. Javnost - The Public 22:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin
2019. The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’. In Imagining the Peoples of Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 83], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin & Nico Carpentier
2010. Contesting the populist claim on “the people” through popular culture: the 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang. Social Semiotics 20:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue