Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:6 (2020) ► pp.938–963
Bacteria, garbage, insects and pigs
Conceptual metaphors in the Ultra-Orthodox anti-military “Ḥardakim” propaganda campaign
Published online: 20 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19109.sim
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19109.sim
Abstract
The present paper focuses on the symbolic meanings of metaphors and their potential social effects. Specifically,
it examines the case of the Jewish Ultra-Orthodox “Ḥardakim” poster campaign distributed throughout Ultra-Orthodox communities in
Israel in 2013. Following social group theory, the paper interprets the symbolic meanings of the main metaphors in the campaign in
order to reconstruct the lifeworld of this religious group. On that basis, it offers a discussion of how metaphors were
strategically utilized in order to draw social boundaries, uphold social norms and sanction group members who deviate from those.
The paper’s empirical contribution is a case study of how symbolic meanings of metaphors as a part of propagandistic discourse
targets and exploits social identities in order to mobilize collective emotions thereby provoking certain actions. It contributes
theoretically by arguing that deeming norm-deviant group members internal threats is an efficient propaganda tool for maintaining
intragroup behavioral codes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Case: Ultra-Orthodox Jewish beliefs and practices
- 3.Theoretical points of departure
- 3.1Social groups as a prerequisite for identity
- 3.2Deviance from group norms
- 3.3Collective emotions: The fear of internal deviants
- 3.4Metaphors of dehumanization and exclusion
- 3.5Propaganda: Exploiting fear, identity and binary oppositions
- 3.6Religious groups and their “dissidents”, “heretics” and “apostates”
- 4.Method and data: Visual metaphors in public posters
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Haredi soldiers are bacteria
- 5.2The IDF is a garbage container and haredi soldiers are garbage
- 5.3Haredi soldiers are pigs
- 5.4Haredi soldiers are insects
- 6.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (82)
Abrams, Dominic, Georgina Randsley de Moura, Paul Hutchison, and Viki Tendayi. 2005. “When Bad Becomes Good (and vice versa): Why social exclusion is not based on difference.” In The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion, edited by Dominic Abrams, Jose M. Marques, and Michael A. Hogg, 161–190. New York: Psychology Press
Altheide, L. David. 2006. “Terrorism and the Politics of Fear.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 6, no. 4 (November): 415–439.
. 2013. “Media logic, social control, and fear.” Communication Theory 23, no. 3 (July 2013): 223–238.
Baumeister, F. Roy, and Mark R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117, no. 3 (May): 497–529.
Bar-Tal, Daniel, Eran Halperin, and Joseph de Rivera. 2007. “Collective emotions in conflict situations: societal implications.” Journal of Social Issues 63, no. 2 (June): 441–460.
Brown, Jeremy. 2018. “Menachot 64b ~ Cursed Be He Who Raises Swine.” Talmudology. October 12, 2018. [URL]
Brown, Rupert. 1989. Group Processes: Dynamics within and Between Groups (2nd ed.) Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: the case of Mein Kampf.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, edited by Louise de Saussure, and Peter J. Schulz, 15–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cohn, Norman. 1975. Europe’s Inner Demons: An Enquiry Inspired by the Great Witch-Hunt. London: Chatto.
Coleman-Brueckheimer, Kate, Joseph Spitzer, and Jonathan Koffman. 2009. “Involvement of Rabbinic and Communal Authorities in Decision-Making by Haredi Jews in the UK with Breast Cancer: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.” Social Science & Medicine 681 (January): 323–333.
Douglas, Mary. 2001. Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Taylor & Francis e-Library. [URL]
Farkash, Tali. 2014. “Haredi soldier: Our life is a nightmare.” Ynet News. December 7, 2013. [URL]
Fass, Hester, and Ronit Lazar. 2011. “Social Work and the Haredi Community in Israel: from rejection to acceptance as reflected in the narrative of a haredi social worker.” Reflections 17, no. 4 (Fall): 32–38.
Forceville, Charles. 2008. “Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations.” In Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by Raymond Gibbs Jr., 464–482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2012. “Creativity in Pictorial and Multimodal Advertising Metaphors.” In Discourse and Creativity, edited by Rodney Jones, 113–132. London: Harlow: Pearson/Longman.
Furedi, Francis. 1997. Culture of Fear. Risk-Taking and the Morality of Low Expectation. London: Cassell.
Furniss, Jamie. 2012. Metaphors of Waste: Several Ways of Seeing “Development” and Cairo’s Garbage Collectors. Doctoral Thesis. University College. [URL]
Gabbay, Ezra, Matthew W. McCarthy, and Joseph Fins. 2017. “The Care of the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Patient.” Journal of Religious Health 561 (April): 545–560.
Gerring, J. Richard, and Alice F. Healy. 1983. “Dual Processes in Metaphor Understanding: Comprehension and appreciation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9, no. 4 (October): 667–675.
Gibbs, W. Jr. Raymond. 2019. “Metaphor as Dynamical–Ecological Performance.” Metaphor and Symbol 34, no. 1 (May): 33–44.
Glassner, Barry. 1999. The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, Yehuda, and Eliezer Witztum. 2002. “Cross-Cultural Encounters between Care Providers: Rabbis’ referral letters to a psychiatric clinic in Israel.” Social Science & Medicine 551 (October): 1309–1323.
Har-Peled, Misgav. 2013. The Dialogical Beast: The Identification of Rome With the Pig in Early Rabbinic Literature. Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University. [URL]
Heilman, Samuel and Eliezer Witztum. 1997. “Value-sensitive therapy: learning from ultra-orthodox patients”. American journal of psychotherapy 51, no 4 (April): 522–541.
Hiddush. 2013. “The “Hardak” Phenomenon and the next phase in the ultra-Orthodox service conflict.” Hiddush, June 24, 2013. [URL]
Hollingsworth, Christopher. 2001. Poetics of the Hive: Insect Metaphor in Literature. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
Inayatullah, Sohail, Aleksandra Izgarjan, Osmo Kuusi, and Matti Minkkinen. 2016. “Metaphors in Futures Research.” Futures 84, no. B (May): 109–114.
Isaacs, R. Harold. 1975. Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
. 1989. Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Janis, L. Irving. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jowett, Garth, and Victoria O’Donnell. 2012. Propaganda and Persuasion (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kamin, Deborah. 2013. “In ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods, anti-IDF posters ‘recall Nazi propaganda.” Times of Israel, July 3, 2013. [URL]
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Linker, Damon. 2000. “From Kant to Schelling: counter-enlightenment in the name of reason.” The Review of Metaphysics 54, no. 2 (December): 337–377. [URL]
Lakoff, George. 1992. Metaphor and War: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. UC Berkeley: Department of Linguistics. [URL]
. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mahaney, C. Darlene. 2002. Propaganda Posters. OAH Magazine of History 16, no. 31(Spring): 41–46. [URL]
McCrann, Grace-Ellen. 2009. “Government Wartime Propaganda Posters: Communicators of Public Policy.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 28, no. 1–2 (May): 53–73.
McQuarrie, F. Edward, and David Glen Mick. 1999. “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: textinterpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses.” Journal of Consumer Research 26, no. 1: 37–54. [URL]
Moore, Jr. Barrington. 2000. Moral Purity and Persecution in History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Musolff, Andreas. 2012. “The study of Metaphor as part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9, no. 3 (May): 301–310.
. 2015. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in press and online media.” In Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, edited by Monika Kopytowska, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oaten, Megan, Richard J. Stevenson, and Trevor I. Case. 2009. “Disgust as a Disease-avoidance Mechanism.” Psychological Bulletin 135, no. 2 (March): 303–321.
Ojha, Amitash. 2013. An Experimental Study on Visual Metaphors. PhD dissertation, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, India. [URL]
Paprotté, Wolf, and René Dirven. 1985. “Metaphor and the System of Languages: The ubiquity of metaphor.” In Metaphor in Language and Thought, edited by Wolf Paprotté & René Dirven, i–vii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Phillips, J. Barbara. 1997. “Thinking Into It: consumer interpretation of complex advertising images.” Journal of Advertising 26, no. 2 (May): 77–87.
Pinto, R. Isabel, José M. Marques, John M. Levine, and Dominic Abrams. 2016. “Membership Role and Subjective Group Dynamics: impact on evaluative intragroup differentiation and commitment to prescriptive norms.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 19, no. 5 (July): 570–590.
Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and Clark R. McCauley. 2000. “Disgust.” In Handbook of Emotions 2nd Edition, edited by Michael Lewis, and Jeanette M. Haviland-Jones, 637–653. New York: Guilford Press.
Popovsky, A. Mark. 2010. “Special Issues in the Care of Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Psychiatric In-patients.” Transcultural Psychiatry 47, no. 4 (October): 647–672.
Schaller, Mark, and Lesley A. Duncan. 2007. “The Behavioral Immune System: Its evolution and social psychological implications.” In Evolution and the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Social Cognition, edited by William von Hippel, Martie G. Haselton, and Joseph P. Forgas, 293–307. New York: Psychology Press.
Scheufele, A. Dietram. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49, no. 1 (February): 103–122.
Sennett, R. 2008. “The Myth of a Purified Community.” In The Community Development Reader, edited by James De Filippis, and Susan Saegert, 174–180. New York: Routledge.
Simonsen, Sandra. 2019. “Discursive Legitimation Strategies: the evolving legitimation of war in Israeli public diplomacy.” Discourse & Society 30, no. 5 (June): 503–520.
Smith, R. Eliot. 1993. “Social Identity and Social Emotions: toward new conceptualization of prejudice.” In Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception, edited by Diane M. Mackie, and David Lewis Hamilton, 297–315. San Diego: Academic Press.
Smith, Philip. 2014. “Of ‘Near Pollution’ and Non-Linear Cultural Effects: Reflections on Masahiro Mori and the Uncanny Valley.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 2, no. 3 (October): 329–347.
Stephan, G. Walther, and Cookie White Stephan. 2000. “An Integrated Threat theory of Prejudice.” In The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, edited by Stuart Oskamp, 23–45. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steuter, Erin, and Deborah Wills. 2010. “’The Vermin have Struck Again’: Dehumanizing the enemy in post 9/11 media representations.” Media, War & Conflict 3, no. 2 (July): 152–167.
Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William. G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel, 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
van Dijk, A. Teun. 2001. “Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Simonsen, Sandra & Christian Baden
Simonsen, Sandra
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
