Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:6 (2020) ► pp.916–937
A corpus-driven exploration of U.S. language planning and language ideology from 2013 to 2018
Published online: 16 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19108.dia
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19108.dia
Abstract
Language planning is influenced by ideological stances, and exports those ideologies through the policy making
process. Residing beneath policy documents lies a language policy of the texts themselves, policing their structure and linguistic
forms by which ideologies are managed. Thus, a careful collection of such documents should offer rich grounds for analysis, to
leverage claims of ideology against empirically founded patterns, and offer rigorous comparison across actors, genres, and policy
areas.
We conducted a corpus-driven exploration of all bills from Congressional sessions 113 to 115 (33,968 documents,
85,612,752 words), and describe the collocational character of U.S. language policy, the semantic preferences of those
collocations, and discuss the exposed ideological structure of these bills. By utilizing such a large corpus, this study responds
to two issues in corpus-aided language policy analysis: (1) a paucity of very large corpora analyses; (2) further utilizes
corpus-driven methods to naively investigate ideologies in status planning.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background and literature review
- 2.1Language policy and planning and legal text
- 2.2Language and ideology
- 2.3Language policy and planning in the United States
- 2.4Locating ideology in discourse
- 2.5Large-scale corpora and critical perspectives
- 2.6Synthesis of corpus linguistics and language policy and planning
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results
- 4.1Pilot
- 4.2Main study results
- 4.2.1Absolute frequency
- 4.2.2Left-slot frequency
- 4.2.3Right-slot frequency
- 4.2.4Main results discussion
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Concluding remarks
References
References (58)
Ackermann, Kirsten, and Yu-Hua Chen. 2013. “Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A Corpus-Driven and Expert-Judged Approach.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121: 235–47.
Agha, Asif. 2005. “Voice, Footing, Enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 38–59.
Anthony, L. 2018. AntConc (version 3.5.3). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. [URL]
Baker, Paul. 2012. “Acceptable Bias? Using Corpus Linguistics Methods with Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 247–56.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306.
Baldauf, Richard B. 2006. “Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context.” Current Issues in Language Planning, 7 (2&3): 147–170.
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple. 2014. “Why Do News Values Matter? Towards a New Methodological Framework for Analysing News Discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and Beyond.” Discourse & Society 25 (2): 135–58.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes. 2004. “If You Look at...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25 (3): 371–405.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. 1994. “Corpus-Based Approaches to Issues in Applied Linguistics.” Applied Linguistics 15 (2): 169–89.
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John M. Sinclair, and Martin Warren. 2009. “Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams.” Applied Linguistics 30 (2): 236–52.
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, and Iddo Porat. 2011. “Proportionality and the Culture of Justification. The American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (2): 463–490.
Curdt-Christiansen, Xiao Lan. 2016. “Conflicting Language Ideologies and Contradictory Language Practices in Singaporean Multilingual Families.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 37 (7): 694–709.
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, Shannon. 2014. “Using Lexical Variables to Identify Language Ideologies in a Policy Corpus.” Corpora 9 (1): 57–82.
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery. 2017. “Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence.” Language Learning 67 (S1): 155–79.
Holborow, Marnie. 2007. “Language, Ideology and Neoliberalism.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (1): 51–73.
Hornberger, Nancy H. 2006. “Frameworks and Models in Language Policy and Planning.” In An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, ed. by Thomas Ricento, 24–41. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publications.
Jones, Peter E. 2007. “Why There Is No Such Thing as ‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’” Language & Communication 271: 337–68.
Kaplan, Robert B., and Richard B. Baldauf. 1997. Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kheirkhah, Mina, and Asta Cekaite. 2015. “Language Maintenance in a Multilingual Family: Informal Heritage Language Lessons in Parent–Child Interactions.” Multilingua 34 (3): 319–46.
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2010. “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics 9 (1): 1–28.
Kochenov, Dimitry, and Fernand de Varennes. 2015. “Language and Law.” In Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide, ed. by Francis M. Hult and David Cassels Johnson, 56–66. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2007. “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 154–79. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Menken, Kate. 2013. “Restrictive Language Education Policies and Emergent Bilingual Youth: A Perfect Storm with Imperfect Outcomes.” Theory Into Practice 52 (3): 160–168.
Millar, Jeff. 2013. “An Interdiscursive Analysis of Language and Immigrant Integration Policy Discourse in Canada.” Critical Discourse Studies 10 (1): 18–31.
Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna, Päivi Honkatukia, and Minna Ruuskanen. 2007. “Legal Texts as Discourses.” In Exploiting the Limits of Law: Swedish Feminism and the Challenge to Pessimism, ed. by Åsa Gunnarsson, Eva-Maria Svensson, and Margaret Davies, 69–87. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Utterly Content in Each Other’s Company.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 131–56.
Ricento, Thomas. 2000. “Historical and Theoretical Perspectives in Language Policy and Planning.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (2): 196–213.
Ricento, Thomas, and Nancy Hornberger. 1996. “Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional.” TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 401–427.
Ricento, Thomas, and Wayne E. Wright. 2008. “Language Policy and Education in the United States.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. by Nancy H. Hornberger. Springer, Boston, MA.
2008. “Language Policy and Language Assessment: The Relationship.” Current Issues in Language Planning 9 (3): 363–73.
2010. “Cases of Language Policy Resistance in Israel’s Centralized Educational System.” In Negotiating Language Policies in Schools: Educators as Policymakers, ed. by Kate Menken, and Ofelia García, 182–97. New York, NY: Routledge.
Spolsky, Bernard, and Elana G. Shohamy. 2000. “Language Practice, Language Ideology, and Language Policy.” Language Policy and Pedagogy: Essays in Honour of A. Ronald Walton, 1–41.
Stubbs, Michael. 1995. “Collocations and Semantic Profiles: On the Cause of the Trouble with Quantitative Studies.” Functions of Language 2 (1): 23–55.
Subtirelu, Nicholas Close. 2013. “‘English... It’s Part of Our Blood’: Ideologies of Language and Nation in United States Congressional Discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (1): 37–65.
Thomas, Wayne, and Virginia Collier. 2002. A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long Term Academic Achievement: Final Report: Project 1.1 Berkeley, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence (CREDE).
Tollefson, James. 2006. “Critical Theory in Language Policy.” In An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, ed. by Thomas Ricento, 42–59. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Splunder, Frank. 2016. “Language Ideologies Regarding English-Medium Instruction in European Higher Education: Insights from Flanders and Finland.” In Discursive Approaches to Language Policy, ed. by Elisabeth Barakos, and Johann W. Unger, 205–230. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Widdowson, Henry G. 1998. “The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 136–151.
Wiley, Terrence G., and Ofelia Garcia. 2016. “Language Policy and Planning in Language Education: Legacies, Consequences, and Possibilities.” The Modern Language Journal 100 (S1): 48–63.
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. “Complex Texts: Analysing Understanding, Explaining and Interpreting Meanings.” Discourse Studies 13 (5): 623–33. [URL]
. 2017. “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Elites’, and the ‘People’: Who’s Who?” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 551–65.
Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi Boukala. 2015. “(Supra)National Identity and Language: Rethinking National and European Migration Policies and the Linguistic Integration of Migrants.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 351: 253–273.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Liu, Xiuli
Zhang, Chen, Ronghui Zhao, Yan Huang & Dipima Buragohain
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
