Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:4 (2021) ► pp.539–562

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Informing the government or fostering public debate?

How Chinese discussion forums open up spaces for deliberation

ORCiD logo with link | Zhejiang University
 | University of Leeds
 | University of Groningen
Published online: 16 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19104.sun
Abstract
This article focuses on a popular form of civic practice in China: casual political talk that occurs in online spaces that are not ostensibly political. We investigate how Chinese citizens engage in politics through a comparative analysis of everyday talk on health issues across three popular online discussion forums: a government-orientated forum (Qiangguo Luntan), a commercial-lifestyle forum (Tieba), and a commercial-topical forum focused on parental advice (Yaolan). Our findings show that conventional deliberation directly involving conflictual and resistant attitude against state authorities is not prominently embraced by Chinese citizens in everyday online settings. However, communal and less confrontational forms of discourse are important for the proto-political talk to turn political, thus serving as prerequisite conditions for the emergence of an online public sphere. We argue that to explain how the public sphere emerges in everyday (non-political) spaces in China, it is essential to take communal discursive forms into account.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The position of the public in healthcare governance
  • 3.The Chinese internet and the public sphere
  • 4.Online spaces and everyday political talk in China
  • 5.Research focus and method
    • 5.1Three cases
    • 5.2Sampling
    • 5.3Content analysis
  • 6.Findings
    • 6.1Normative conditions of deliberation
    • 6.2Social-civic communicative practices
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
References (54)
Bibliography
Balla, Steven J. 2014. “Health System Reform and Political Participation on the Chinese Internet.” China Information 28(2): 214–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 739–768. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CNNIC. 2017. “The 40th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China.” Accessed December 28, 2017. [URL]
Coleman, Stephen. 2007. “Mediated Politics and Everyday Life.” International Journal of Communication 1(1): 49–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleman, Stephen, and Giles Moss. 2012. “Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 9(1):1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Donald D. Searing. 2005. “Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative System.” Acta Politica 40(3): 269–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damm, Jens. 2007. “The Internet and the Fragmentation of Chinese Society.” Critical Asian Studies 39(2): 273–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2004a. “Net-public sphere research: Beyond the ‘first phase’.” Javnost – The Public 11(1): 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: A Specification of the Idealized Conditions of Democratic Communication.” Studies in Social and Political Thought 10(10): 2–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friess, Dennis, and Christiane Eilders. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research.” Policy & Internet 7(3): 319–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleiss, Marielle Stigum. 2015. “Speaking Up for the Suffering (Br)other: Weibo Activism, Discursive Struggles, and Minimal Politics in China.” Media, Culture & Society 37(4): 513–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd. 2008. “Needles in a haystack: A New Approach for Identifying and Assessing Political Talk in Nonpolitical Discussion Forums.” Javnost-the Public 15(2): 17–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. What’s Wife Swap Got to Do with It?: Talking Politics in the Net-Based Public Sphere. PhD diss., Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd, and Scott Wright. 2014. “Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of “Superparticipants”.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 625–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd. 2015. “Everyday political talk in the Internet-based public sphere.” In Handbook of digital politics, edited by Stephen Coleman and Deen Freelon, 247–263. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Todd, Daniel Jackson, and Scott Wright. 2015. “From Everyday Conversation to Political Action: Talking Austerity in Online ‘Third Spaces’.” European Journal of Communication 30 (6): 648–665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “‘We Need to Get Together and Make Ourselves Heard’: Everyday Online Spaces as Incubators of Political Action.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (10): 1373–1389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action (trans. Thomas McCarthy). Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Theory of Communicative Action (trans. Thomas McCarthy). Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans. Thomas Burger). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. William Rehg). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Rongbin. 2015a. “Defending the Authoritarian Regime Online: China’s “Voluntary Fifty-Cent Army”.” The China Quarterly 2241: 1006–1025. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Manufacturing Consent in Cyberspace: China’s’ Fifty-Cent Army’.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 44(2): 105–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Baogang. 2014. “Deliberative Culture and Politics: The Persistence of Authoritarian Deliberation in China.” Political Theory 42(1): 58–81. [URL]
Jiang, Min. 2010. “Authoritarian Deliberation on Chinese Internet.” Electronic Journal of Communication 20(3&4): 7–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornreich, Yoel, Ilan Vertinsky, and Pitman B. Potter. 2012. “Consultation and Deliberation in China: The Making of China’s Health-Care Reform.” China Journal 68(2): 176–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalathil, Shanthi, and Taylor C. Boas. 2003. Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, Gary, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107(2): 326–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Joohan, and Eun Joo Kim. 2008. “Theorizing Dialogic Deliberation: Everyday Political Talk as Communicative Action and Dialogue.” Communication Theory 18(1): 51–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kligler-Vilenchik, Neta. 2015. “From wizards and house-elves to real-world issues: Political talk in fan spaces.” International Journal of Communication 91: 2027–2046.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Orion A. 2013. “Net Inclusion: New Media’s Impact on Deliberative Politics in China.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 43(4): 678–708. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Yuanli. 2009. “Reforming China’s Health Care: for the People, by the People?” The Lancet 373(9660): 281–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Jun. 2017. “From ‘Moments of Madness’ to ‘the Politics of Mundanity’-Researching Digital Media and Contentious Collective Actions in China.” Social Movement Studies 16(4): 418–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2011. “China’s” Networked Authoritarianism”.” Journal of Democracy 22(2): 32–46. Project MUSE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo, 211–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayring, Philipp. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marques, Ângela CS, and Rousiley CM Maia. 2010. “Everyday Conversation in the Deliberative Process: An Analysis of Communicative Exchanges in Discussion Groups and Their Contributions to Civic and Political Socialization.” Journal of Communication 60(4): 611–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medaglia, Rony, & Yang, Yang. 2017. Online Public Deliberation in China: Evolution of Interaction Patterns and Network Homophily in the Tianya Discussion Forum. Information, Communication & Society 20(5): 733–753. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2010. A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramesh, M., Xun Wu, and Alex Jingwei He. 2013. “Health Governance and Healthcare Reforms in China.” Health policy and planning 29(6): 663–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlæger, Jesper, and Min Jiang. 2014. “Official Microblogging and Social Management by Local Governments in China.” China Information 28(2): 189–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2007. “Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme.” Journal of public deliberation 3(1): 12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, Yu, Todd Graham, and Marcel Broersma. 2018. “Environmental Talk in the Chinese Green Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Daily Green-Speak across Three Chinese Online Forums.” In Managing Democracy in the Digital Age, edited by Julia Schwanholz, Todd Graham and Peter-Tobias Stoll, 243–263. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tai, Zixue. 2006. The Internet in China: Cyberspace and Civil Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teets, Jessica C. 2014. Civil Society under Authoritarianism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wyatt, Robert O., Elihu Katz, and Joohan Kim. 2000. “Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces.” Journal of Communication 50(1):71–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Scott. 2012. “From “Third Place” to “Third Space”: Everyday Political Talk in Non-Political Online Spaces.” Javnost-The public, 19(3): 5–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “The Impact of ‘Super-Participants’ on Everyday Political Talk.” Journal of Language and Politics 17(2): 155–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Scott, Todd Graham, and Dan Jackson. 2015. “Third Space, Social Media, and Everyday Political Talk.” In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, edited by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen, 74–88. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Guobin. 2009. The power of the Internet in China: Citizen activism online. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “The Co-Evolution of the Internet and Civil Society in China.” Asian Survey 43(3): 405–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “How Do Chinese Civic Associations Respond to the Internet?” The China Quarterly 189(1): 122–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zheng, Yongnian, and Guoguang Wu. 2005. “Information Technology, Public Sphere, and Collective Action in China.” Comparative Political Studies 38(5): 507–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Weiyu. 2010. “Technical Capital and Participatory Inequality in eDeliberation” Information, Communication & Society 13(7): 1019–1039. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

He, Kun, Scott A Eldridge & Marcel Broersma
2025. The discursive logics of online populism: social media as a “pressure valve” of public debate in China. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 22:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
He, Kun, Scott A. Eldridge & Marcel Broersma
2023. Who are the people? Populists’ articulation of “the people” in contemporary China. Chinese Journal of Communication 16:3 ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Zizheng
2025. There Is a Crack in Everything. In Consumer Activism in China [Consumption and Public Life, ], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Zizheng
2025. Consumers, Businesses, Media, and Government: The “Consumer Sphere” in the Womb. In Consumer Activism in China [Consumption and Public Life, ], ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Zizhong
2025. Probing Social Support and Self‐Disclosure Within Chinese Online Domestic Violence Support Groups: Leveraging Multiple Machine Learning Approaches. Journal of Community Psychology 53:5 DOI logo
Sun, Yu & Scott Wright
2024. Relay activism and the flows of contentious publicness on WeChat: a case study of COVID-19 in China. Information, Communication & Society 27:2 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Altman Yuzhu & Nicole Talmacs
2023. Jacinda Ardern and the limits of gender on the Chinese-language Internet: a critical discourse analysis. Feminist Media Studies 23:6 ► pp. 2780 ff. DOI logo
Stead, Victoria & Kirstie Petrou
2023. Beyond the 'Triple Win': Pacific Islander farmworkers' use of social media to navigate labour mobility costs and possibilities through the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49:9 ► pp. 2194 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Zizheng & Nairui Xu
2023. The emergence of “consumer sphere”: the logics behind short video activism tactics of Chinese consumers. Media Asia 50:2 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Yu, Todd Graham & Marcel Broersma
2022. Complaining and sharing personal concerns as political acts: how everyday talk about childcare and parenting on online forums increases public deliberation and civic engagement in China. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 19:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue