Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp.197–225

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The Twittering Presidents

An analysis of tweets from @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump

 | Curtin University
 | Curtin University
 | University of Liverpool
 | Curtin University
Published online: 18 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19046.wig
Abstract
This paper uses a Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA) approach to analyse tweets from the Twitter accounts of Presidents Barack Obama (@Barack Obama) and Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump). The tweets were posted during the last nine months of President Obama’s effective presidency and the first nine months of President Trump’s presidency. The tweets are analysed using automated text analysis which is interpreted through an SF-MDA lens, supplemented by manual analysis. The analysis examines ideational and interpersonal emphasis in the tweets with the aim of showing how the composition and content construct a view of how each president and his presidency are presented to the public. The findings suggest marked contrasts in presidential style with President Trump foregrounding the interpersonal while President Obama foregrounds the ideational. Where President Trump presents as self-promoting, autocratic, opinionated and igniting discord in his tweets, President Obama presents as democratic, moderate, restrained and seeking social harmony.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature Review
  • 3.Analysis of tweets from @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump: A multimodal perspective
  • 4.Theoretical model, data and method
    • 4.1Theoretical model
    • 4.2Data
    • 4.3Method
  • 5.Findings and Discussion
    • 5.1Automated analyses
      • Categories
      • Keywords
      • Sentiment
      • Emotion
    • 5.2Manual Analyses
      • First person pronouns
      • Attitude
    • 5.3Multimodal tweets
  • 6.Summary and findings
  • Notes
  • References
References (50)
References
Auxier, Brooke, and Jennifer Golbeck. 2017. “The President on Twitter: A Characterization Study of@ realDonaldTrump.” In International Conference on Social Informatics, 377–390. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barberá, Pablo, and Thomas Zeitzoff. 2018. “The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?” International Studies Quarterly 62(1): 121–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John A. 2014a. “Looking for What Counts in Film Analysis: A Programme of Empirical Research.” In Visual Communication, ed. by David Machin, 301–329. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014b. Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle, and Jack Grieve. 2019. “Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted between 2009 and 2018.” PloS ONE 14(9): e0222062. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, Bethany A., Kate Kenski, and Di Wang. 2015. “The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20(4): 363–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enli, Gunn. 2017. “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 32(1): 50–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enli, Gunn, and Anja Aaheim Naper. 2016. “Social Media Incumbent Advantage: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney’s Tweets in the 2012 US Presidential Election Campaign.” In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, ed. by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen, 364–378. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Justin H., and Kaylee T. Johnson. 2016. “Twitter Taunts and Tirades: Negative Campaigning in the Age of Trump.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): 748–754. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Complementarities in Language. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, ed. 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Josephus Johannes Bezemer, and Kay L. O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(1): 72–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2018. “Re/constructing Politics through Social & Online Media: Discourses, Ideologies, and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Young-shin Lim. 2016. “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review 42 (5): 849–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Weiai Xu. 2018. “The More Attacks, the More Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review 44(2): 201–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd edition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., ed. 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis SF-MDA: Constructing Ideational Meaning Using Language and Visual Imagery.” Visual Communication 71: 443–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., and Victor Lim Fei. 2014. “Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In Texts, Images and Interactions: A Reader in Multimodality, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Carmen D. Maier, 137–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan, and Peter Wignell. 2019. “SFL and Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ed. by Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine, and David Schönthal. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael. 2011. The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd edition. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L. 2017. “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perez, Sarah. 2017. “Twitter Officially Expands its Character Count to 280 Starting Today. Accessed January 22, 2019. [URL]
Ross, Andrew S., and David Caldwell. 2020. “‘Going Negative’: An Appraisal Analysis of the Rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter.” Language & Communication 701: 13–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers. 2018. “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis-and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society 4 (2): 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royce, Terry D. 2007. Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, ed. by Terry D. Royce, and Wendy Bowcher, 63–110. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron. 2009. The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorato, Danielly, and Renato Fileto. 2019. “Linguistic Pattern Mining for Data Analysis in Microblog Texts Using Word Embeddings.” In Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 351: 50–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolee, Galen, and Steve Caton. 2018. “Twitter, Trump, and The Base: A Shift to a New Form of Presidential Talk?.” Signs and Society 6 (1): 147–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tasente, Tanase. 2020. “Twitter Discourse Analysis of US President Donald Trump.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 2 (1): 67–75. [URL]
Trevisan, Piergiorgio. 2018. “‘Tweeting Engagement’. Strategies of Identity Construction and ‘Alignment-Disalignment’ in Donald Trump’s Use of Social Media.” Lingue e Linguaggi 281: 337–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trump Twitter Archive. Accessed January 22, 2019. [URL]
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Critical Analysis of Musical Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 91: 319–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergeer, Maurice. 2015. “Twitter and Political Campaigning.” Sociology Compass 9 (9): 745–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watt, Anneliese, Caroline Carvill, Richard House, Jessica Livingston, and Julia M. Williams. 2017. “Trump Typhoon: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Donald’s Twitter Feed.” In 2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 1–7. IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kevin Chai, Sabine Tan, Kay O’Halloran, and Rebecca Lange. 2018. “Natural Language Understanding and Multimodal Discourse Analysis for Interpreting Extremist Communications and the Re-Use of these Materials Online.” Terrorism and Political Violence. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kay O’Halloran, and Sabine Tan. 2019. “Semiotic Space Invasion: The Case of Donald Trump’s US Presidential Campaign.” Semiotica 2261: 185–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Yini, Chris Wells, Song Wang, and Karl Rohe. 2018. “Attention and Amplification in the Hybrid Media System: The Composition and Activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter Following during the 2016 Presidential Election.” New Media & Society 20(9): 3161–3182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Jaber, Fadi
2025. Social media framing of the 2022 ‘War in Ukraine’: A content analysis study of the Canadian prime minister’s tweets. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 14:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Meader, Aimee Pavia & Matthew Wood Hayes
2025. ‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder. Journal of Language and Politics DOI logo
Wan Abdul Halim, Wan Fatimah Solihah binti, Kesumawati binti Abu Bakar, Nasser Salimi Aghbolagh & Nur Syuhada Mohd Radzi
2025. Countering Ethno-Religious Propaganda: A Multimodal Analysis of Anwar Ibrahim’s Political Communication on TikTok. In Race, Religion, Royalty in Malaysia [Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, ], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Zainal Abidin, Najah, Hanaa Samaha & Nur Azwin Zulkarnain
2025.  “ Dajjal (False Messiah) Fried Chicken”: Impolite Judgment as a Tool for Moral Accountability . Howard Journal of Communications ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Junchen
2025. The historical evolution of Chinese political discourse and socio-ideological change: a discourse-historical analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1 DOI logo
Karjus, Andres & Christine Cuskley
2024. Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Baranowski, Paweł & Paulina Matera
2023. Words that Matter: Donald Trump’s Twitter Communication in the Pre-COVID-19 Period. Polish Political Science Review 11:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Bugs, Geisa Tamara, Agnes Silva de Araujo, Diego Saez-Trumper & Rodrigo Firmino
2023. Mapping Political Extremism on Twitter in Brazil. In Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14107], ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Hansson, Sten & Ruth Page
2023. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies 20:4 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Haeder, Simon F. & Jacqueline Chattopadhyay
2022. The Power of a Tweet? Social Media, Presidential Communication, and the Politics of Health. Presidential Studies Quarterly 52:2 ► pp. 436 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue