Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:4 (2020) ► pp.646–665
A contrastive analysis of reports on North Korea’s missile program
The New York Times and China Daily
Published online: 15 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19030.lia
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19030.lia
Abstract
The paper compares the representation of the November 2017 missile test in news reports by The New York
Times and China Daily. The U.S. reports embody to some extent a Cold War mindset by tending to
internationalize the issue and make itself appear as a victim of the crisis. Through the attribution of blame, the U.S. seeks to
evade its responsibilities and maintain its hegemonic status. The Chinese reports intimate that the crisis is mainly a problem
between the U.S. and the Korean Peninsula. These reports tend to present China as a responsible stakeholder seeking to help solve
the issue through communication and dialogue. The analysis of these differences is informed theoretically by perceived differences
in culture. The paper concludes that the discourse patterns of these reports index a rising China and a shift in the balance of
power in international politics.
Keywords: DPRK missile test, nuclear issue, The New York Times, China Daily
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Research findings
- 4.1Social actors
- 4.2News narratives
- 4.2.1News topics
- 4.2.2News contexts
- 4.2.3Consequences and verbal reactions
- 4.2.4News comments
- 4.3Argumentations
- 4.4Discussions: Culture differences and power struggles
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (22)
Berger, Peter Ludwig, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Choi, Jinbong. 2010. “The Representation of North Korean National Image in National Newspapers in the United States.” Public Relations Review 36 (4): 392–394.
Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2005. “Spectacular Ethics: On the Television Footage of the Iraq War.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 143–59.
Chung, Mun-Young, Justin R. Lessman, and Meijing Fan. 2014. “Framing the Nuke: How News Media among Countries in the Six- Party Talks Framed North Korea’s Nuclear Test.” North Korean Review 10 (1): 22–38.
Dai, Jia, and Kideuk Hyun. 2010. “Global risk, Domestic Framing: Coverage of the North Korean Nuclear Test by US, Chinese, and South Korean News Agencies.” Asian Journal of Communication 20 (3): 299–317.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 431: 51–58.
Fu, Ying. 2017. “The Korean Nuclear Issue: Past, Present, and Future-A Chinese Perspective.” Last updated May 9 2017. [URL]
Kim, Kyung Hye. 2014. “Examining US News Media Discourses about North Korea: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society 25(2): 221–244.
Lim, Jeongsub, and Hyunjin Seo. 2009. “Frame Flow between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21 (2), 204–223.
MacDonald, Malcolm, and Duncan Hunter. 2019. The Discourse of Security: Language, Illiberalism and Governmentality. Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
McCombs, Max, and Donald Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187.
Min, Su Jung. 1999. “Strategies of Constructing Meaning: A Critical Discourse Anaysis of News on the North Korean Nuclear Threat”. I.T.L. Institut voor Togepaste Linguistik, 123–124: 1–35.
Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michał Krzyżanowski, Heinz Schönbauer, and Ruth Wodak. 2005. “Debating the European Constitution: On Representations of Europe/the EU in the Press.” Journal of Language and Politics 4(2): 227–271.
Qin, Yaqing. 2012. “Chinese Culture and Its Implications for Foreign Policy-making.” Last updated April 12, 2012. [URL]
Richardson, John E. 2004. (Mis) Representing Islam. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
