Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:3 (2019) ► pp.346–370

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Missing the (Turning) point

The erosion of democracy at an American University

 | University of Nebraska-Lincoln
 | University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Published online: 6 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18055.fuc
Abstract
On August 25, 2017, student members of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a right-wing conservative organization who advocates for smaller government and free market enterprise, recruited on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) campus. Members of the UNL community protested nearby. Part of the protest was recorded on video and released to social media leading to harsh public criticism that accused the university of restricting free speech and being an unsafe environment for conservative students. Drawing on cognitive linguistics (e.g. metonymy, framing) and multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA), this paper explores how the TPUSA incident at UNL was recontextualized in local and national media discourse, the ways in which the social actors and events were framed, and its consequences. The authors show how these representations reinforce dominant neoliberal discourses (which correlate with right-wing discourses) that negatively impact public education, providing a necessary counter to a populist political climate in which anti-intellectualism reigns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Getting to the (turning) point and other necessary context
  • 3.Freedom of speech
  • 4.Theoretical framework
  • 5.Method
  • 6.Findings
    • 6.1Additions
    • 6.2Deletion
    • 6.3Substitution
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Elements of Semiology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 2003. Class, Codes, and Control: Volume VI the Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catalano, Theresa. 2016. Talking about Global Migration: Implications for Language Teaching. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catalano, Theresa, and Linda R. Waugh. Forthcoming, 2019. Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric: Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claussen, D. S. 2011. A brief history of anti-intellectualism in American media. Academe, 97(3), 8–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: OUP USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolowich, Steve. April 27, 2018. “State of Conflict: How a Tiny Protest at the U. of Nebraska Turned into a Proxy War for the Future of Campus Politics,” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2018. “Re-/Constructing Politics through Social and Online Media: Ideologies, Discourses and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. June 30, 2018. “How Conservatives Weaponized the First Amendment,” The New York Times. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCausland, Phil, and Emmanuelle Saliba, E. August 12, 2017. “Charlottesville Rally Turns Deadly: One Killed After Car Strikes Crowd,” NBC News. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Messer-Davidow, Ellen. 1993. “Manufacturing the Attack on Liberalized Higher Education.” Social Text 361: 40–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mindock, Clark. May 24, 2018. “Taking a Knee: Why are NFL Players Protesting and When Did They Start to Kneel?” The Independent. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Ötsch, Walter O., and Stephan Pühringer. 2017. “Right-Wing Populism and Market- Fundamentalism.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 497–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saunders, Daniel B.. 2010. “Neoliberal Ideology and Public Higher Education in the United States.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 8 (1): 41–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiede, Hans Joerg. 2017. “Exhuming McCarthy (Meet Me at the Book Burning)” Academe, 103 (5): 15–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
U.S. Const. Amend. I. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. “Discourse Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse and Society, 6 (2): 243–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 2016. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse- Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do, and Paul G. Renigar. 2016. “Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 71–135. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. “The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”.” Journal of Language and Politics 16, no. 41 (2017): 551–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wippell, Jack G. R.
2025. From the fringe to the floor: radical right networks and legislative collaboration in U.S. state legislatures. The Journal of Legislative Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Özbilgin, Mustafa F. & Cihat Erbil
2024. How (Not) to Manage Intersectional Inclusion. In Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Funk, Marcus & Burton Speakman
2022. Centrist Language, Camouflaged Ideology: Assembled Text-Based Content on Mainstream and Ideological News Podcasts. Journalism Studies 23:11 ► pp. 1415 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue