Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:2 (2020) ► pp.251–269
Reconciliation as a political discourse in Thailand’s current conflicts
Published online: 31 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18054.tha
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18054.tha
Abstract
Why do Thai governments fail in maintaining peace through conducting a reconciliation process? This article answers this question through an assessment of how the term reconciliation has been defined and used by the Thai governments and political leaders during the past decades. This article finds that the political conflicts in Thailand have never been solved because several times, reconciliation in the Thai language is a term that has been dynamically interpreted and applied by leaders of the conflicting groups as a means to defeat the people of the opposing groups rather that a means of resolving problems and reconciling society.
Keywords: reconciliation, discourse, political conflict, Thailand
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Reconciliation in conflict transformation theories
- 3.The definitions of reconciliation in the Thai language and context
- 4.Reconciliation policies during the periods of Surayud, Samak, and Somchai: Finding the ways back to the Harmonious Thai society through conflict resolution and management methods
- 5.Reconciliation policies during the periods of Abhisit and Yingluck: Applying the transitional justice ideas to reconcile the Thai society
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Notes
References
References (48)
“ขิงแก่” ฝ่อ! รับ “แม้ว” ทรงอิทธิพล-สมานฉันท์เหลว. 2007. Manager Online, March, 9. Retrieved 17-02-2017 from [URL]
“สุรยุทธ์” ลั่น “ในชีวิตไม่เคยถอดใจ”- ยันนำพาชาติฝ่าพ้นวิกฤตให้ได้. 2007. Manager Online, January, 20. Retrieved 17-02-2017 from [URL]
“Reuters Journalist Killed in Bangkok Protests.” 2010. Reuters, April 4. Retrieved 15-12-2016 from [URL]
Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2001. Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion: Toward a Training Model of Interreligious Peacebuilding. Journal of Peace Research 38(6), 685–704.
Azar, Edward E. and John W. Burton. (eds.). 1986. International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Bell, Christine, and Kimana Zulueta-Fülscher. 2016. Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlement Process. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman. 2009. “Introduction: The Nature of Conflict and Conflict Resolution.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman, 1–11. London: Sage.
Bloomfield, David, and Ben Reilly. 1998. “The Changing Nature of Conflict and Conflict Management.” In Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, edited by Peter Harris and Ben Reilly, 9–28. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Bloomfield, David. 2003. “Reconciliation: an Introduction.” In Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: A Handbook, edited by Bloomfield, David, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 10–18. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Brounéus, Karen. 2003. Reconciliation: Theory and Practice for Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
Chairat Charoensin-o-larn. 2010. Thailand in 2009: Unusual Politics Becomes Usual. Southeast Asian Affairs: 302–331.
. 2013. Thailand in 2012: A Year of Truth, Reconciliation, and Continued Divide. Southeast Asian Affairs: 285–304.
Chaiyan Ratchakul. 2002. Conflicts in the Context of Peaceful Means. In Class Materials of Peace Studies and Peace Subject (Chapter 2). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Sukhothai Thammatirat Open University. [in Thai]
Fischer, M. 2011. “Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice.” In Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II, edited by Beatrix Austin, Martina Fischer, and Hans J. Giessmann, 406–430. London: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Galtung, Johan. 1976. “Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, and Peacebuilding.” In Peace, War and Defense: Essays in Peace Research, Vol. II1, edited by Johan Galtung, 282–304. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.
. 2001. “After Violence, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution: Coping with Visible and Invisible Effects of War and Violence.” In Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, edited by Mohammed Abu-Nimer, 3–24. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Hewison, Kevin. 2014. Thailand: The Lessons of Protest. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia 50(1): 1–15.
. 2015. Thailand: Contestation over Elections, Sovereignty and Representation. Representation 50(1): 51–62.
Huang, Kai-Ping, and Stithorn Thananithichot. 2018. Social Divisions, Party Support, and the Changes in the Thai Party System since 2001. International Area Studies Review, 21(3): 214–230.
Huyse, Luc. 1998. “Transitional Justice.” In Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, edited by Peter Harris and Ben Reilly, 273–280. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
King Prajadhipok’s Institute. 2012. The National Reconciliation Building. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. [in Thai]
Kriesberg, Louis. 2011. “The State of the Art in Conflict Transformation.” In Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II, edited by Beatrix Austin, Martina Fischer, and Hans J. Giessmann, 49–73. London: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Lederach, John Paul. 1995. Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
. 1999. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies, 3rd edition. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
McClung, Margi, and Karina Kloos. 2016. Promoting Peace: Mitigating and Managing Intra-Household Property Rights Disputes in Rwanda. Seattle, WA: United States Agency for International Development.
Miall, Hugh. 2004. Conflict Transformation: A Multi-Dimensional Task. Berlin: Berghof Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.
Nishizaki, Yoshinori. 2014. Peasants and the Redshirt Movement in Thailand: Some Dissenting Voice. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41(1): 1–28.
Ockey, James. 2009. Thailand in 2008: Democracy and Street Politics. Southeast Asian Affairs: 315–333.
Pickering, Peg. 2000. How to Manage Conflict: Turn All Conflicts into Win-win Outcomes, 3rd edition. Franklin Lake, NJ: Career Press.
Pye, Oliver, and Wolfram Schaffar. 2008. The 2006 Anti-Thaksin Movement in Thailand: An Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 8–61.
Rosoux, Valerie. 2009. “Reconciliation as a Peace-Building Process: Scope and Limits.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman, 543–562. London: Sage.
Rungtham Sujithammarak. 2002. Peace Studies and Peace. Class Materials of Peace Studies and Peace Subject (Chapter 1). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Sukhothai Thammatirat Open University. [in Thai]
Shriver, Donald. W. 1995. An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spangler, Brad. 2003. “Settlement, Resolution, Management, and Transformation: An Explanation of Terms.” In Beyond Intractability, edited by Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Boulder, Colorado: Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Staub, Ervin. 2000. “Genocide and Mass Killing: Origins, Prevention, Healing and Reconciliation.” Political Psychology 21(2): 367–82.
Stephenson, Carolyn M. 2008. “Peace Studies, Overview.” In Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict, Volume 2, edited by Lester Kurtz, 809–820. Oxford: Elsevier.
Suravich Weerawan. 2007. ตัวตนของพล.อ.สุรยุทธ์. Manager Online, March, 23. Retrieved 17-02-2017 from [URL]
Taylor, David. 2014. Victim Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms: Real Power or Empty Ritual? Discussion Paper. Impunity Watch, Utrecht.
“Thailand: Revolution in Red and Yellow.” 2009. The Guardian, April 14. Retrieved 11-12-2016 from [URL]
Thoms, Oskar N. T., James Ron and Roland Paris. 2008. The Effects of Transitional Justice Mechanisms: A Summary of Empirical Research Findings and Implications for Analysts and Practitioners. Ottawa: Centre for International Policy Studies, University of Ottawa.
