Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:6 (2019) ► pp.893–914

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Weaponizing words

Rhetorical tactics of radicalization in Western and Arabic countries

ORCiD logo with link | University of Debrecen, Doctoral School of Linguistics | University of Debrecen, Institute of English and American Studies (Hungary)
 | Ain Shams University, Egypt | Peerwith B.V., The Netherlands
Published online: 6 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18048.abd
Abstract
This paper draws on Pratt, Mary Louise. “Harm’s way: Language and the contemporary arts of war.” PMLA 124(5) 2009: 1515–1531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar description of the key linguistic operations in war-making: exhortation, offense, deception and mediation. The study postulates that ISIS enacts the four operations in the radicalization of Muslims in Arabic and Western countries. Using FrameNet, the four concepts are mapped to four frames: Attempt_suasion, Cause_emotion, Intentional_deception and Translating. Frame-based analysis of a comparable corpus representing bilingual publications of ISIS is carried out to explore these operations. Corpus tools complemented the analysis with detecting contrastive rhetorical tactics and chronological changes ISIS imposes to radicalize followers. Findings highlight the destructive effect of transliterated words in the English corpus and refer to the significance of exhortation in the studied Arabic corpus.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiential knowledge in FrameNet
    • 2.1Identifying frames through lexical units
    • 2.2Selecting frame elements through lexical units
  • 3.Hypotheses of the study
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (25)
References
Abdelzaher, Esra. 2019a. “Lexicon-based Detection of Violence on Social Media.” Cognitive Semantics 5(1): 32–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. “The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus Based Study.” 3(2): 173–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Rikaby, Ali Badeen Mohammed, and Tengku Sepora Tengku Mahadi. “The significance of the discursive strategies in al-Baghdadi’s and al-Zawahiri’s hortatory speeches.” Journal of Language and Politics 171(6 2018: 769–788. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arosoaie, Aida. 2017. “In the name of honour and freedom: the sacred as a justifying tool for ISIS’and secular violence.” Culture and Religion 18(3): 278–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkins, Sue, Michael Rundell, and Hiroaki Sato. 2003. “The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography.” International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 333–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey. 2018. “A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23(3): 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifton, Jonathan. 2017. “Justifying the jihad.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(3): 453–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Essam, Bacem A., Mostafa M. Aref, and Fayrouz Fouad. 2019. “When folkloric geopolitical concerns prompt a conspiratorial ideation: the case of Egyptian tweeters.” Geo Journal 84(1): 121–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.” In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 11, pp. 123–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. “Frame semantics.” Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings 341: 373–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and Collin Baker. 2011. “A frames approach to semantic analysis.” In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. pp. 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam RL Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Abby Wright. 2003. “FrameNet in action: The case of attaching.” International journal of lexicography 16(3): 297–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerges, Fawaz A. 2009. The far enemy: why Jihad went global. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heickerö, Roland. 2014. “Cyber terrorism: Electronic jihad.” Strategic Analysis 38(4): 554–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakhfif, Abdelaziz, and Mohamed Tayeb Laskri. 2016. “A frame-based approach for capturing semantics from Arabic text for text-to-sign language MT.” International Journal of Speech Technology 19(2): 203–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maggio, James. 2007. “The presidential rhetoric of terror: The recreation of reality immediately after 9/11.” Politics & Policy 35(4): 810–835. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novenario, Celine Marie I. “Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State through strategies publicized in Jihadist magazines.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39(11) 2016: 953–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W. 2011. “Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 4(2): 92–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petruck, Miriam RL. 1996. “Frame semantics. Handbook of Pragmatics .” Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. “Harm’s way: Language and the contemporary arts of war.” PMLA 124(5) 2009: 1515–1531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Myriam Schwarzer-Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, and Jan Scheffczyk. 2006. “ FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice .” Berkeley Online Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Alexandra A., and Joshua A. Tucker. “The Islamic State’s information warfare.” Journal of Language and Politics 17(2) 2018: 258–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sikos, Jennifer, and Sebastian Padó. 2018. “FrameNet’s using relation as a source of concept-based paraphrases.” Constructions and Frames 10(1): 38–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Al-Fayad, Fadye
2022. How much can Saudi corporations benefit from cause-related marketing? Insights from exploring the charitable incentives of Saudi consumers. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 13:7 ► pp. 1038 ff. DOI logo
Essam, Bacem A. & Muhammad S. Abdo
2021. How Do Arab Tweeters Perceive the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:3 ► pp. 507 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue