Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:2 (2019) ► pp.184–206

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Battlefield EU

Macedonian parties’ representations in times of crisis

ORCiD logo with link | Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities – Skopje
Published online: 18 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18019.tak
Abstract
EU is a discursive field where multiple meanings and representations are created, negotiated and contested. Research has shown that the concept possess an interpretive power often used as an instrument of political confrontation. Such is the case, this study argues, with the two largest Macedonian parties – VMRO-DPMNE and the Social Democrats – who in a pursuit of changing or maintaining the power structuration in the society have produced a discourse on EU that best fits their political agendas. In a situation of a prolonged political crisis, and a significant involvement of EU, the two parties have commodified the discourse on EU into an instrument of self-promotion and/or criticism of the other. Demonstrating the instrumental use of the representations of EU by analysing the discursive strategies and the linguistic means deployed are the general aims of this study.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Constructing (and criticizing) EU
  • 3.Crisis and its discursive effects
  • 4.Constructing oneself, constructing (and criticizing) the other
  • 5.Methodological design
  • 6.Data selection
  • 7.Data analysis
    • 7.1VMRO DPMNE
    • 7.2Social Democrats
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (42)
References
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak. 2014. “They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: The Greek success story and the rise of the far right.” Discourse & Society 25(4): 540–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brief. 2014. Заев: Само на Груевски и фамилијата им одговара да ја изгубиме препораката за ЕУ,поради милионските бизниси. [Zaev: Only Gruevski and his family will profit from losing the recommendations]. Brief, 24 June. Available at [URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
Brinar, Irena, and Marjan Svetlicic. 1999. “Enlargement of the European Union: The Case of Slovenia.” Journal of European Public Policy 6(5): 802–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conti, Nicolo. 2007. “Domestic parties and European integration: The problem of party attitudes to the EU, and the europeanisation of parties.” European Political Science 61:192–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conti, Nicolo, Swen Hutter, and Nanou Kyriaki. 2018. “Party competition and political representation in crisis: An introductory note.” Party Politics 24(1): 3–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damjanovski, Ivan. 2018. Analysis of Public Opinion on Macedonia`s Accession to the European Union (2014–2017). Konrad Adenauer Foundation in the Republic of Macedonia Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis” – Skopje; available at: [URL]
Delanty, Gerard. 1995. Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutsche Welle. 2016. Иванов за „Билд“: 25 години ЕУ нѐ лаже и манипулира! [Ivanov for “Der Bild”: For 25 years EU has lied and manipulated us!] Available at: [URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, L. Wolfgang Muller, Katrin Praprotnik, and Anna Katharina Winkler. 2016. “Beyond salience and position taking: How political parties communicate through their manifestos.” Party Politics: 1–13Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro, and Maria João Ferreira. 2015. “Through ‘seas never before sailed’: Portuguese government discursive legitimation strategies in a context of financial crisis.” Discourse & Society 26 (6): 682–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortchner, Bernhard, and Christoffer Kølvraa. 2012. “Narrating a ‘new Europe’: From ‘bitter past’ to self-righteousness?” Discourse & Society 231:377–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde. 1995. “How does one become a good European?’ : The British press and European integration.” Discourse & Society 61: 177–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellstrom, Anders. 2009. “Teaching Europeans how to be Europeans.” Journal of Language and Politics 81: 167–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Karen (ed). 1999. Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union. London. UCL press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, Cristopher. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson. 2002. “Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?” Comparative Political Studies 351: 965–989. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutter, Swen, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Guillem Vidal. 2018. “Old versus new politics: The political spaces in Southern Europe in times of crises.” Party Politics 24(1): 10–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, Sine Norholm. 2009. “No place like home? The role of the media in the framing of Europe.” Journal of Language and Politics 81: 244–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanal 5. 2015. Gruevski: влез во НАТО и ЕУ останува наша стратешка цел. [Gruevski: entering NATO and EU remains our strategic goal], available at:[URL] (accessed 28 October 2018)
Kopecky, Petr, and Cas Mudde. 2002. “The two sides of Euroscepticism: party positions on Euroscepticism in East Central Europe.” European Union Politics 3(3): 297–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michal, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak. 2018. “The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1-2): 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladrech, Robert. 2002. “Europeanization and political parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis.” Party Politics 81: 389–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majstorovic, Danijela. 2007. “Construction of Europeanization in the High Representatives discourse in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Discourse & Society 181: 627–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malmberg, Af Mikael, and Bo Strath. 2002. “Introduction: The national meanings of Europe.” In The Meaning of Europe: Variety and Contention within and among Nations, edited by Mikael Af Malmberg and Bo Strath, 1–26. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Netpress. 2015. Иванов: На регионот му е потребна недоложна интеграција во ЕУ и НАТО [Ivanov: the region needs an urgent integration in EU and NATO]. Available at: [URL]
Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyzanowski, Heinz Schönbauer, and Ruth Wodak. 2005. “Debating the European Constitution: On representations of Europe/the EU in the press.” Journal of Language and Politics 21: 227–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. 2002. “Europe: conceptualizing a continent.” In The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to European Union, edited by Anthony Pagden, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pirro, Andrea LP., Paul Taggart, and Stijn van Kessel. 2018. “The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis: Comparative conclusions.” Politics 38 (3): 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Paul Taggart (eds). 2008. Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia. 2011. Имаме решенија [We have solutions], election program. Available at: [URL] (accessed October 27 2018).
. 2016. План за живот во Македонија [Plan for a life in Macedonia], election program. Available at: [URL] (accessed 27 October 2018).
SDSM. 2016b. АВМУ призна вина, реформи во медиумскиот простор се неопходни [AMVU admitted guilt, reforms in the media are necessary], Available at: [URL] (accessed 28 October 2018)
Stojic, Marko. 2006. “Between Europhobia and Europhilia: Party and popular attitudes towards membership of the European union in Serbia and Croatia.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 7 (3): 312–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vecer 2015. Груевски испука поситивни бомби [Gruevski fired positive bombs] available at: [URL]
VMRO DPMNE. 2014. Проверено [checked], election program. Available at: [URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
. 2016. Реално [Real], election program. Available at: [URL] (accessed 2 October 2017).
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. 2013. “Europe’s new civilizing missions: the EU’s normative power discourse.” Journal of Political Ideologies 181: 35–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Takovski, Aleksandar
2022. Political alliance with COVID-19: Macedonian politics and the strategic use of the pandemic. Discourse & Society 33:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue