Cover not available

Article published In: Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse
Edited by Karin Bischof and Cornelia Ilie
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:5] 2018
► pp. 617635

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (53)
References
Bucholtz, Mary. 2003. “Theories of Discourse as Theories of Gender: Discourse Analysis in Language and Gender Studies.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 43–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin. 1992. “‘Das ist eine Frage des Intellekts, Frau Kollegin!‘ Zur Behandlung von Rednerinnen in deutschen Parlamenten.“ In Die Geschlechter im Gespräch. Kommunikation in Institutionen, ed. by Susanne Günthner, and Helga Kotthoff, 287–309. Stuttgart: Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. „Deutsch im demokratischen Parlament. Formen und Funktionen der öffentlichen parlamentarischen Kommunikation.“ In Sprache und Politik. Deutsch im demokratischen Staat, ed. by Jörg Kilian, 85–98. Mannheim: Duden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and Sylvia Shaw. 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 61: 3–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deaux, Kay, and Laurie L. Lewis. 1983. “Assessment of gender stereotypes: Methodology and components.” Psychological Documents 131: 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Language and Power. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fracchiolla, Béatrice. 2011. „Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate – The Royal-Sarkozy debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2480–2488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grisdale, Mackenzie. 2011. “Heckling in the House of Commons.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 34 (3): 38–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haines, Elizabeth L., Kay Deaux, and Nicole Lofaro. 2016. “The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 (3): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Ailsa. 2007. Hierarchies of Belonging. National Identity and Political Culture in Scotland and Quebec. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtz-Bacha, Christina. 2009. “Politikerinnen-Bilder im internationalen Vergleich.“ Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 501: 3–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2004. “Insulting as (un) parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A rhetorical approach.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Representing gender in parliamentary dialogue: Are there any cross-cultural stereotypes?” In (Re)presentations and Dialogue, ed. by François Cooren, and Alain Letourneau, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Gendering confrontational rhetoric: discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments.” Democratization 20 (3): 501–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2016. Sexism, harassment and violence against women parliamentarians. Issues Brief October 2016. Online available: [URL] [9.5.2017]
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), and United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. 2017. Women in Politics: 2017. Online available: [URL].
Jones, Jennifer J. 2016. “Talk ‘Like a Man’: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 625–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kite, Mary E., Kay Deaux, and Elizabeth L. Haines. 2008. “Gender Stereotypes.” In Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories, ed. by Florence L. Denmark, and Michele A. Paludi, 205–236. London: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 2003. “Language, Gender, and Politics: Putting ‘Women’ and ‘Power’ in the Same Sentence.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 161–178. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M. 2007. “Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis.” Critical Discourse Studies 4 (2): 141–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. Verfügbar unter: [URL] [27.05.2017].
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris. 2003. “Westminster Women: the Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 511: 84–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maloney, Ryan. 2014. “Chrystia Freeland Heckled In House, Commentator Tells Her To Use ’Big Girl Voice’ (VIDEO).” The Huffington Post Canada, 02.04.2014. Online available: [URL] [22.05.2017]
Millar, Matthew D. 2014. “I’m sorry for my inappropriate tweet to MP Chrystia Freeland.” The Vancouver Observer, 05.02.2014. Online available: [URL] [22.05.2017]
Murray, Rainbow (ed.). 2010. Cracking the highest glass ceiling: a global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randall, Vicky. 1987. Women and Politics: An International Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ripley, Will, and Edmund S. Henry. 2014. “Outrage follows sexist outburst at Tokyo assembly meeting.” CNN, 20.06.2014. Online available: [URL] [23.05.2017].
Sarcinelli, Ulrich. 2011. Politische Kommunikation in Deutschland Medien und Politikvermittlung im demokratischen System. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. “Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates.” Discourse and Society 11 (3): 401–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In The Elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, ed. by Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Whose text? Whose context?Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stopfner, Maria. 2013a. Streitkultur im Parlament. Linguistische Analyse der Zwischenrufe im österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Parliamentary heckling in the Austrian National Council.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée No spécial II1: 89–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. „Institutionen als Handlungsfeld I: Legislative.“ In Handbuch Sprache in Politik und Gesellschaft, ed. by Kersten Sven Roth, Martin Wengeler, and Alexander Ziem, 371–397. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talbot, Mary. 2003. “Gender Stereotypes: Reproduction and Challenge.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 468–486. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1996. Gender and Discourse. Featuring a new essay on talk at work. New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General. 2013. Measures taken and progress achieved in the promotion of women and political participation: Report of the Secretary-General. Document symbol: A/68/184. Online available: [URL] [09.05.2017].
Walsh, Clare. 2013. Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, Language and Discourse. Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing gender.” Gender and Society 1 (2): 125–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Gender and Language: Cultural Concerns” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol 9, ed. by James D. Wright, 698–703. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Brigitta Busch. 2004. “Approaches to media texts.” In The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies, ed. by John D. H. Downing, Denis McQuail, Philip Schlesinger, and Ellen Wartella, 105–122. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Gilbert Weiß. 2005. “Analyzing European Union discourses: Theories and applications”. In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 121–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Erjavec, Tomaž, Matyáš Kopp, Nikola Ljubešić, Taja Kuzman, Paul Rayson, Petya Osenova, Maciej Ogrodniczuk, Çağrı Çöltekin, Danijel Koržinek, Katja Meden, Jure Skubic, Peter Rupnik, Tommaso Agnoloni, José Aires, Starkaður Barkarson, Roberto Bartolini, Núria Bel, María Calzada Pérez, Roberts Darģis, Sascha Diwersy, Maria Gavriilidou, Ruben van Heusden, Mikel Iruskieta, Neeme Kahusk, Anna Kryvenko, Noémi Ligeti-Nagy, Carmen Magariños, Martin Mölder, Costanza Navarretta, Kiril Simov, Lars Magne Tungland, Jouni Tuominen, John Vidler, Adina Ioana Vladu, Tanja Wissik, Väinö Yrjänäinen & Darja Fišer
2025. ParlaMint II: advancing comparable parliamentary corpora across Europe. Language Resources and Evaluation 59:3  pp. 2071 ff. DOI logo
Och, Malliga
2020. Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?. Politics & Gender 16:2  pp. 388 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue