Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:3 (2021) ► pp.451–473

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Portrayal of power in manifestos

Investigating authority legitimation strategies of Pakistan’s political parties

ORCiD logo with link | Air University, Pakistan
 | Air University, Pakistan
Published online: 16 February 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18009.far
Abstract
Power, conforming to particular political groups of the society, is exercised on the masses by making them believe in the legitimacy of that dominance. This association enables the groups to exercise their power and promulgate their ideologies through their discourse as well. One illustration of this discourse appears in the form of political manifestos. Utilizing the tool of language, the political actors (as agents of political parties) set agendas, pertinent topics and position their stance in these manifestos. Framed under critical discourse analysis, the current study attempts to investigate this act of ‘legitimation’ promulgated by Chilton, Paul Anthony. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and the strategies of Authority Legitimation, devised by . 2008. Discourse and Practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. The article illustrates how the power-holders utilize their linguistic resources to authorize their stance, idea, and action. The study helps explicating the relation between power, ideology and language and promulgates consciousness regarding the reality constructed by humans, as social and political actors.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Pakistani political field
    • 1.2Politics and persuasion
    • 1.3Manifestos as political discourse
    • 1.4Legitimation in political discourse
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • 3.1Personal authority in the Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.2Expert authority in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.3Role model authority in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.4Impersonal authority in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.5Authority of tradition in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.6Authority of conformity in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.7Statistical calculations
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (45)
References
Adeney, Katharine. 2015. “A Move to Majoritarian Nationalism? Challenges of Representation in South Asia.” Representation 51(1): 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ali, Marwah K., Anne A. Christopher, and Munif Z. F. B. Nordin. 2016. “Linguistic Legitimation of Political Events in Newspaper Discourse.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(4): 76–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Tahmazi, Thulfiqar H. 2015. “The pursuit of power in Iraqi political discourse: Unpacking the construction of sociopolitical communities on Facebook.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10(2): 163–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Awami National Party [ANP]. 2013. “Elections Manifesto 2013.” Accessed October 22, 2017. [URL]
Bilal, Hafiz A., Hina M. Ahsan, Sundus Gohar, Sehreen Younis, and Saqib J. Awan. 2012. “Critical discourse analysis of political TV talk shows of Pakistani media.” International Journal of Linguistics 4(1): 203–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Masculine domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2011. “Variations on a theme: Party Manifesto discourses in the UK 2010 Election.” Language and Representation 9(9): 9–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul Anthony. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2006. Narrating the Political Self. Language in Society 35(4): 467–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2): 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Language in New Capitalism. Discourse & Society 13(2): 163–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of the Clinical Gaze. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamson, William. 2001. “Promoting political engagement.” In Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, edited by W. Lance Bennett & Robert M. Entman, 56–75. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakimnia, Roya, Inger K. Holmstron, Marianne Carlsson, and Anna T. Hoglund. 2014. “Exploring the communication between telenurse and caller: A critical discourse analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 9(1): 242–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hussain, Sajid, A. R. Sajid, and Shafiq Jullandhry. 2018. “Politics-media-youth nexus: Analysis of Pakistan’s general elections 2013.” Cogent Social Sciences 4(1): 2–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobson, Matthew. 2007. “Legitimization and the discursive reproduction of social domination: Case study of British political discourse and the Israeli occupation of Palestine.” Athenea Digital 111: 34–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-Mesa, Jeovany, David Alejandro González-Chica, Rodrigo Pereira Duquia, Renan Rangel Bonamigo, and Joao Luiz Bastos. 2016. “Sampling: how to select participants in my research study?” Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 91(3): 326–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masroor, Farzana, Qintarah N. Khan, Iman Aib, and Zulfiqar Ali. 2019. “Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians.” Social Media + Society 5(4): 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., Silvia M. Mendes. 2001. “The policy space of party manifestos.” In Estimating the policy position of political actors, edited by Michael Laver, 90–114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Memon, Nazish, Faraz Ali Bughio, and Illahi Bux Gopang. 2014. “Critical Analysis of Political Discourse: A Study of Benazir Bhutto’s Last Speech.” Balochistan Journal of Linguistics 21: 79–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, David, Janet Coleman, William Connolly and Alan Ryan. 1991. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motion, Judy. 2005. Participative public relations: Power to the people or legitimacy for government discourse? Public Relations Review 31(4): 505–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muñoz, Heraldo. 2013. Getting away with murder: Benazir Bhutto’s assassination and the politics of Pakistan. London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muttahida Qaumi Movement [MQM]. 2013. “Empowering People: 2013 Manifesto.” Accessed October 10, 2017. [URL]
Nadeem, Ushna, Muhammad Asim Mahmood, & Rashid Mahmood. 2014. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Election Manifestos of Pakistani Political Parties.” Public Policy and Administration Research 4(11): 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz [PMLN]. 2013. “National Agenda for Real Change: Manifesto 2013”. Accessed November 20, 2017. [URL]
Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarians [PPPP]. 2013. “2013 Manifesto.” Accessed November 21, 2017. [URL]
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf [PTI]. 2013. “PTI Manifesto Election 2013.” Accessed October 25, 2017. [URL]
Pitcher, Ben. 2006. “‘Are you thinking what we’re thinking?’ Immigration, multiculturalism and the disavowal of racism in the run-up to the 2005 British General Election.” Social Semiotics 16(4): 535–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Paul. 2001. How to Win an Election: The Art of Political Campaigning. London: Politico’s publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., Michał Krzyżanowski, David Machin and Ruth Wodak. 2016. Advances in critical discourse studies. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rye, Danny. 2014. “Political Parties and Power: A New Framework for Analysis.” Political Studies 63(5): 1052–1069. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadeghi, Bahador, Mohammad Taghi Hassani, and Vahid Jalali. 2014. “Towards (de-) legitimation discursive strategies in news coverage of Egyptian protest: VOA & Fars news in focus.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 981: 1580–1589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarvat, Humaira. 2015. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s Manifesto.” International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 4(2): 373–379.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serfaty, Viviane. 2010. “Web campaigns: popular culture and politics in the U.S. and French presidential elections.” Culture, Language and Representation 81: 115–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaikh, Nazra Zahid, Ruksana Tariq, and Najeeb-us-Saqlain. 2016. “Cartoon War…A Political Dilemma! A Semiotic Analysis of Political Cartoons.” Journal of Media Studies 31(1): 74–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taiwo, Rotimi. 2008. “Legitimization and coercion in political discourse: A case study of olusegun obasanjo address to the PDP elders and stakeholders forum.” Issues in Political Discourse Analysis 2(2): 79–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila. 2006. “Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring.” Organization Studies 27(6): 789–810. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Aims of critical discourse analysis.” Japanese Discourse 11: 17–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsham, Geoff. 1993. Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2023. Making death (in)different: discursive legitimation in death trials. Social Semiotics 33:4 ► pp. 841 ff. DOI logo
Koller, Veronika, Alexandra Krendel & Jessica Aiston
2023. The Language of Gender-Based Separatism, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue