Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 17:6 (2018) ► pp.858–881
Political rhetoric and discursive framing of national identity in Croatia’s commemorative culture
Published online: 14 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17074.ban
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17074.ban
Abstract
The topic of this paper is framing of collective, national identities in commemorative speeches. It identifies abstract conceptions of Croatian national identity articulated by political elites during commemorative practices and examines what patterns are used for their linguistic expression. The questions that are posed are how Croatian nation and national identity are framed in discourse and whether constructs of national identity are formed depending on the context and on the party political affiliation of the speaker. However, the aim is also to track potential changes in elite narratives over time. The analysis is based on a corpus of commemorative speeches delivered by Croatia’s political elites on the occasion of celebration of the Croatian army victory in a military operation. The main focus is on the conceptual and linguistic analysis of the collective identities and sociocultural concepts in the staged communication during commemoration rituals.
Keywords: nation, national identity, commemoration, framing, discourse
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology: The Discourse-historical approach and cultural approaches to critical discourse analysis
- 3.Nation, memory, and national identity
- 4.Case study: Annual celebration of operation ‘Storm’
- 4.1The frame of national historical statehood
- 4.2The frame of national unity
- 4.3The frame of national victory and victimization
- 4.4The frame of ‘Europeanization’ of national identity
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (29)
Barić, Nikica. 2005. Srpska pobuna u Hrvatskoj 1990–1995. [Serb rebellion in Croatia 1990–1995]. Zagreb: Golden Marketing – Tehnička knjiga.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2003. The Formation of Croatian National Identity: A Centuries-old Dream. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Benford, Robert D. and Snow, David A. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 261: 611–639.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge
Connerton, Paul. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge and New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
De Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse and Society 10(2):149–170.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Longman.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, NY et al.: Harper & Row.
Krzyżanowski, Michaɬ. 2009. “On the ‘Europeanisation’ of Identity Constructions in Polish Political Discourse after 1989.” In Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. by Aleksandra Galasińska and Michaɬ Krzyżanowski, 95–113. Palgrave MacMillan.
Kukec, Tomislav. 2012. “Ivo Josipović: Trebamo pružiti ruku sugrađanima Srbima i pokloniti se i njihovim žrtvama.” [Ivo Josipović: We should reach out to Serb citizens and pay respects to their victims] Jutarnji list, August 6.
Lindekilde, Lasse. 2014. “Discourse and Frame Analysis: In-Depth Analysis of Qualitative Data in Social Movement Research.” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, ed. by Donatella della Porta, 195–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Misztal, Barbara A. 2003. Theories of Social Remembering. Maidenhead and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Novi list. 2006. “Nastavljamo borbu za civiliziranu Hrvatsku.” [We are continuing the fight for a civilised Croatia], August 4.
Reisigl, Martin. 2008. “Analyzing Political Rhetoric.” In Qualititive Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michaɬ Krzyżanowski, 96–120. Palgrave Macmillan.
Scollo, Michelle. 2011. “Cultural approaches to discourse analysis: A theoretical and methodological conversation with special focus on Donal Carbaugh’s Cultural Discourse Theory.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 6(1):1–32.
Smith, Anthony D. 1992. “National Identity and the Idea of European Unity.” International Affairs 68(1): 55–76.
Narodne novine. 1990. Ustav Republike Hrvatske [Constitution of the Republic of Croatia]. no. 56/90.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton, 352–371. Blackwell Publishing.
Vjesnik. 2009. “Proslava 5. kolovoza je i poziv na zajedništvo svih čimbenika u hrvatskom društvu.” [Celebration of August 4 is also an invitation to unity of all factors in the Croatian society], August 6.
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth (Eds.) 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 64–94. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Wodak, Ruth and De Cillia, Rudolf. 2007. “Commemorating the Past: The Discursive Construction of Official Narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’.” Discourse and Communication 1(3): 315–341.
Wodak, Ruth, De Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin, and Liebhart Karin. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Errera, Kelly & Sarah M. DeIuliis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
