Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:3 (2019) ► pp.371–392

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

“Leftie snowflakes” and other metaphtonymies in the British political discourse

ORCiD logo with link | Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
Published online: 13 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17073.pra
Abstract
The present paper deals with the use of deliberate metaphors in the political discourse. The potential of dehumanising metaphors to create derogatory descriptions used to disparage one’s political opponents is analysed. Also, metaphorical descriptions prove to be very productive in creating polysemy in previously monosemous items which are used in a new capacity in order to create an effect of novelty and surprise. This function appears especially useful in the language of politics in general, and the language of British politics in particular. The paper is maintained within the methodological framework of cognitive linguistics, focusing on the theories of conceptual metaphor and conceptual metonymy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Conceptual metaphor and metonymy
  • 3.Dehumanizing metaphors
  • 4.Methodology and data
  • 5.+weak people are liquid substances+
    • Case 1.Wet
    • Case 2.Slug
    • Case 3.Toad
    • Case 4.Melt
    • Case 5.Snowflake
  • 6.Other examples
  • 7.Summary and prospects of further research
  • Note
  • Dictionaries
  • Corpus
  • References
References (42)
Dictionaries
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language (https://​ahdictionary​.com/)
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged. 2014. 12th Edition. HarperCollins Publishers
English Oxford Living Dictionaries (https://​en​.oxforddictionaries​.com/)
PWN Dictionary of Polish Language (https://​sjp​.pwn​.pl/)
Corpus
NoW (News on the Web) corpus (https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/now/)
References
Barcelona, Antonio. 2015. “Metonymy.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Dąbrowska, Ewa; Divjak, Dagmar. (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 143–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beger, Anke. 2011. “Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures.” Metaphorik.de 201, 39–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chakelian, Anoosh. 2017. “The absolute boy and the melts: how Corbynism created a new political language.” Accessed 29/10/2017. [URL]
Costello, Kimberly and Gordon Hodson. 2010. “Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal-human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 131, 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 2014 Vol. 53(1), 175–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara and Lieven Vandelanotte. 2017. “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3), 565–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2007. “A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor.” Accessed 15/11/2017 [URL]
Forceville, Charles and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2002. “The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions.” In René Dirven and Ralf Pörings (red.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 435–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2015. “Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?” Journal of Pragmatics 901, 73–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2015. “Metaphor.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Dąbrowska, Ewa; Divjak, Dagmar. (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 167–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action.” Cognitive Linguistics 1–31 (1990), 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2007. “Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar. A cross-linguistic perspective on body-part terms.” In Radden, Günter, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg and Peter Siemund (eds.). Aspects of Meaning Construction, 77–98. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. 1933. Mein Kampf. 23rd ed. Munich: Franz Eher Nachfolger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodson, Gordon, Cara MacInnis and Kimberly C. Costello. 2014. “(Over)valuing “humanness” as an aggravator of intergroup prejudices and discrimination.” In Paul G. Bain, Jeroen Vaes, and Jacques-Philippe Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization New York: Psychology Press, 86–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoblock, Natalia. 2017. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in the Ukrainian Conflict.” Presentation at: ICLC-14, Tartu, Estonia.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1997. Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980a. “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 77, No. 8, 453–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980b. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1991. “Metaphor and War. The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf.” Peace Research Vol. 23, No. 2/3, 25–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought. 1993. Orthony, Andrew (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 202–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeanette. 2017. “Metonymy.” In Barbara Dancygier (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 407–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, Karl. 2017. “Slugs and melts: inside the language and culture of the Corbynite left.” Accessed 27/10/2017 [URL]
Musolff, Andreas. 2007. “What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf.” Patterns of Prejudice, Vol. 41:1 (2007), 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Immigrants and Parasites: The History of a Bio-social Metaphor.” In Michi Messer, Renee Schroeder and Ruth Wodak (eds.). Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Springer, 249–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media.” In Monika Kopytowska (ed.) Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres [ Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1] 2015 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholson, Rebecca. 2016. “‘Poor little snowflake’ – the defining insult of 2016.” Accessed 31/10/2017 [URL]
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, Gudrun W. 2017. The value of deliberate metaphor. LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco and Alicia Galera-Masegosa. 2011. “Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation.” Language Value, Vol. 31 (2011) 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Safire, William. 2008. Safire’s Political Dictionary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J. 2011. “From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor.” Metaphorik.de 211, 83–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Deliberate Metaphor Affords Conscious Metaphorical Cognition.” Cognitive Semiotics, Volume 5, Issue 1–2, 179–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 901, 67–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, J. Gerard, Gudrun W. Reijnierse and Christian Burgers. 2014. “When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013).” PLoS One. 9(12). Accessed 2/11/2017. [URL].
Sullivan, Karen. 2017. “Conceptual Metaphor.” In: Barbara Dancygier (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 385–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning.” PLoS One. 23;6(2). Accessed 2/11/2017 [URL].
Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Kippin, Sean
2024. The Conservatives and the “War on Woke”. In Public Policy and Democratic Backsliding in the UK [Understanding Governance, ], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Kochman-Haładyj, Bożena & Robert Kiełtyka
2023. Paradigm Shift in the Representation of Women in Anglo-American Paremiology – A Cognitive Semantics Perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 68:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Mei-Ya, Shiou-Ping John Pan & I-Ting Tsai
2023. ‘I’m not blue or green. I’m black’. The participatory entextualization of translingual memes and metapragmatic comments in transnational sociopolitical discourse. Discourse & Society 34:4 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
De Groeve, Ben, Brent Bleys & Liselot Hudders
2022. Ideological resistance to veg*n advocacy: An identity-based motivational account. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Burch, Leah
2021. Understanding and Debating the Concept of ‘Hate Crime’. In Understanding Disability and Everyday Hate, ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2020.  Foids are worse than animals. A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse. Topics in Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2022. In dialogue with non-humans or how women are silenced in incels’ discourse. Language and Dialogue 12:3 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2024. “All women are like that”: an overview of linguistic deindividualization and dehumanization of women in the incelosphere. Linguistics Vanguard 10:1 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Bucholtz, Mary
2019. The public life of white affects. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23:5 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue