Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 17:6 (2018) ► pp.769–788

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The significance of the discursive strategies in al-Baghdadi’s and al-Zawahiri’s hortatory speeches

A multidisciplinary approach

 | College of Arts, Al-Mustansiriya University
 | School of Languages, Literacies and Translation, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Published online: 14 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17048.moh
Abstract
Recently, jihadi rhetoric has been employed extensively to ordain a justified violence and to incorporate radical groups’ identifications. In this article, the researchers take Reisigl’s and Wodak’s discourse – historical approach (2001; Wodak, R. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Routledge Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), van Dijk’s ideological square (Van Dijk, T. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar: 267) and Chilton’s binary concepts in political discourse (2004: 197–205) to show the significance of the discursive strategies in Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s and Ayman al-Zawahiri’s jihadi rhetoric used to establish their so-called Islamic State. We present two exemplary calls for jihad by al-Zawahiri (2006) and al-Baghdadi (2015) to exemplify their jihadist ideology giving much focus to in-group and out-group representations in their speeches and to their social impacts on Muslim societies over the last ten years. We argue further that such calls are abusive to Islamic religion and are designed in historical, pragmatic and communicative contexts (as mental models) to gain political legitimacy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Language, politics and religion
    • 2.2Previous studies on Al-Qa’ida and ISIS leaders’ speeches
  • 3.Theoretical framework
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Referential strategy in constructing of the ‘Self’ and the ‘Other’ in Texts 1 and 2
    • 5.2Mobilizing support for jihadi activities through religious allusions
    • 5.3Making arguments via topoi and fallacies to gain political legitimacy
    • 5.4Constructing an extremist Sunni identity via micro-legitimatory tools
  • 6.Conclusions
  • References
References (26)
References
Al-Saaidi, S., Pandian, A. & Al-Shaibani, G. 2016a. “The Semantic Macrostructures and Lexicalizations in Osama bin Laden’s Speech of Incitement”. Academic Research International, 7(3): 288–300.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Saaidi, S. K., Pandian, A., & Al-Shaibani, G. K. S. (2016b). Prabhakaran’s National Heroes’ Day Speech (1992) and Positive Identity Construction via Linguistic Choices. Journal of Advance Research in Humanities and Social Science, 1(5), 23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. and Schaffner, C. 1997. “Discourse and Politics.” in Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 21), edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 206–230. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Politics as talk and text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and application. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, D., & Allison, O. 2007. Understanding and Addressing Suicide Attacks: The Faith and Politics of Martyrdom Operations. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IntelCenter 2008. Words of Ayman al-Zawahiri (Vol. 1). Alexandria: Tempest Publication, LLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Words of Ayman al-Zawahiri (Vol. 2). Alexandria: Tempest Publication, LLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, R. 2005. Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mansfield, L. 2006. His Own Words: A Translation of the Writings of Dr. Ayman Al Zawahiri. New York: TLG Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muqit, A. 2012. “Ideology and power relation reflected in the use of pronoun in Osama bin Laden’s speech text.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6): 557–561.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connell, D. 2015. God wills it: Presidents and the political use of religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Podvornaia, A. 2013. “The Discursive Battlefield of the War on Terror: Enabling strategies for garnering public support in the rhetoric of George W. Bush and Osama Bin Laden .” in Discourses of war and peace, edited by Hodges, A., 69–91. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., and Wodak, R. 2009. “The discourse-historical approach.” in Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.), edited by Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., 87–121. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. 2008. “Rhetoric of political speeches”. In Handbook of communication in the public sphere (Vol. 41), ed. by Wodak, R. and Koller, V., 243–270. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, R. and Theye, K. 2008. “The symbolic DNA of terrorism. Communication Monographs, 75(1): 52–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, P. and Mayr, A. 2010. Language and power. London: Routledge Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaffner, C. 1997. Analyzing Political Speeches. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 2013. A Rhetorical Analysis of Messages to America by Osama bin Laden: People of America, I speak to you. Deutschland: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” in Anàlisi del discurs politic, edited by Clara Ubaldina Lorda & Montserrat Ribas, 15–34. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. “Ideology and discourse analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2): 115–140 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R., and Meyer, M. (Eds.). 2009. Methods for critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Routledge Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Mohammed Al-Rikaby, Ali Badeen
2024. The aesthetic values of the semiotic choices in Arab protests. Journal of Language and Politics 23:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Brookes, Gavin, Tony McEnery & Isobelle Clarke
2023. The Representation of Islamism in the UK Press. In Media Language on Islam and Muslims, ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Brookes, Gavin & Tony McEnery
2020. Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 893 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue