Article published In: Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’
Edited by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:4] 2017
► pp. 582–594
“The people” in populist discourse
Using neuro-cognitive linguistics to understand political meanings
Published online: 12 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
Abstract
At the centre of populism is a problem of meaning. We could simply say it is a semiotic problem, but I would like to go further, and say that it’s a cognitive problem, one intrinsic to the human nervous system. It is a characteristic of our species that becomes highly active and significant in group action at certain social and historical conjunctures. The problem is the meaning of the word people, which on most accounts is centrally important for making out what the phenomenon called “populism” is about. It is unhelpful to say the word is meaningless or vague, because clearly something is going on in the minds of its users and their hearers. That something is not simply about denoting an entity; it is about activating a mental effect.
Keywords: People, populism, language, meaning, cognition, affect, neuroscience, word frequency, collocation
Article outline
- 1.Theoretical orientations: discourse, meaning, brain and body
- 2.“The people” in Trump and Le Pen
- 2.1Donald Trump’s inaugural address compared to Barack Obama’s
- 2.2Marine Le Pen took Donald Trump
- 3.By way of conclusion…
- Notes
References
References (27)
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carroll, Lewis. 1871. Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. London: Macmillan. See also: [URL], based on the 1896 edition.
Chilton, Paul. 1994. “La plaie qu’il convient de fermer …” Les métaphores du discours raciste. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (6): 583–619.
. 2017 forthcoming. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage et société: 160–161.
Gallese, Vittorio. 2009. Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 191: 519–536.
. 2013. Mirror neurons and art. In Art and the Senses, edited by F. Bacci & D. Melcher, pp. 441–9. Oxford University Press.
. 2016. The Multimodal Nature of Visual Perception: Facts and Speculations. Gestalt Theory 38 (2/3): 127–140.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea, pp. 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
Gallie, Walter B. 1964. Essentially Contested Concepts. In W. B. Gallie, Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, pp. 157–191. London: Chatto & Windus.
Hart, Christopher J. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hart, Christopher 2015. Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3):238–260.
2016. The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse analysis: integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse and Society 3(27): 335–50.
Isenberg, Nancy, D. Silbersweig, A. Engelien, S. Emmerich, K. Malavade, B. Beattie, A. C. Leon, & E. Stern. 1999. Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proceedings of the National Academy. of Sciciences USA 961: 10456–10459.
Kaal, Bertie. 2017. Worldview and Social Practice: A Discourse-Space \Approach to Political Text Analysis. PhD Thesis, Vrije Univesiteit Amsterdam.
Kopytowska, Monika. 2015a. Ideology of “here and now”. Mediating distance in television news. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3): 347–365.
. 2015b. Covering conflict: between universality and cultural specificity in news discourse genre and journalistic style. International Review of Pragmatics 71: 308–339.
Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Pulvermuller, Friedemann. 2013. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract semantics. Cognitive Scences 17(9): 458–70.
Ziem, Alexander. 2014. Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Borja, Anthony Lawrence
Neuner, Fabian Guy
Nawrocki, Michał
Wang, Xiaomei, Andrew South, Brett Hashimoto & Clifton Farnsworth
GOKCEKUYU, Ertugrul
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zhang, Junchen
Alekseev, Alexander
2022. “It is in the nation-state that democracy resides”. Journal of Language and Politics 21:3 ► pp. 459 ff.
Alekseev, Alexander
Alekseev, Alexander
Helal, Fethi
Keating, John
Stopfner, Maria
Westberg, Gustav
Demata, Massimiliano
Li, Jianing & Min-Hsin Su
Pasitselska, Olga & Christian Baden
Rheindorf, Markus
Stewart, Craig O.
Breeze, Ruth
Breeze, Ruth
Deye, Joseph M & Gail T Fairhurst
Homolar, Alexandra & Ronny Scholz
Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
