Article published In: Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’
Edited by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:4] 2017
► pp. 535–550
Populist discourses in the Hungarian public sphere
From right to left (and Beyond)?
Published online: 12 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
Abstract
Extending Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso. claim to the importance of ‘populism’ for a democratic politics, I argue that the ‘we’, when issued from a left-wing position around ‘empty signifiers’, must be informed by an inclusionary logic. In my critical study of the Hungarian Government’s right-wing populist discourses, I show that their billboard campaign in 2016 against the European Union’s migrant quota articulates the ‘we are not like them’ exclusionary distinction of ‘against and over’. Through Judith Butler’s category of vulnerability and Mary Matsuda’s relative distinction between immediate and indirect targets of exclusion, I explore the inclusionary logic of the campaign by the Two-Tailed Dog Party. I demonstrate that a non-identitarian collective subject "from below" in their alternative left-wing populism is made possible by the power of irony that may sidestep the mobilising force of fear that should legitimise the Government’s agenda.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Beyond the exclusionary logic of ‘us’
- 3.Analysis of the ideological investments of the billboards
- 4.The alternative left-wing populism
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (12)
Barát, Erzsébet. 2012. “Queering the intersection of legislative, religious, and higher educational exclusion: Revisiting the First Case of collective LGBT litigation in Hungary.” In Transport of Queer Theory, ed. by Katharina M. Wiedlack, and Sushila Mesquita, 81–95. Vienna: Zaglossus.
. 1996. “Are You an Alien? Ideologies at Work in the Printed Hungarian Media.” In Framing the Issues: British Studies – Media Studies Conference Papers, ed. by John Cunningham and János Horváth, 125–48. Budapest: British Council.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life – The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.
Chiantrea-Stutte, Patricia, and Adrea Pető. 2003. “Cultures of Populism and the Political Right in Central Europe.” Comparative Literature and Culture 5(4): 417–27.
Connell, W. Raewyn and James Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept.” Gender and Society 19(6): 829–859.
Hutchings, Stephen, and Vera Tolz. 2015. Nation, Ethnicity and Race on Russian Television: Mediating Post-Soviet Difference. London and New York: Routledge.
. 1996. “Why do empty signifiers matter to politics?” In Emancipation(s), ed. by Ernesto Laclau, 36–46. London: Verso.
Mari J. Matsuda, Charles R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado, and Kimberlé Crenshaw. 1993. Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment. Colorado and Oxford: Westview Press.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Hyttinen, Anniina
Luining, Michiel & Tom Van Hout
Szalai, Andras
2024. Bordering and crisis narratives to illiberal ends. Journal of Language and Politics 23:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
Dobkiewicz, Patryk, Agnieszka Chmiel & Małgorzata Fabiszak
Brusenbauch Meislova, Monika & Steve Buckledee
2021. Discursive (re)construction of populist sovereignism by right-wing hard Eurosceptic parties in the 2019 European parliament elections. Journal of Language and Politics 20:6 ► pp. 825 ff.
Barát, Erzsébet
Barát, Erzsébet
Lubarda, Balsa
Csehi, Robert
Varga, Renáta
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.