Article published In: The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology
Edited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 110–136
Mobilising the micro-political voice
Doing the ‘Human Microphone’ and the ‘mic-check’
Published online: 25 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.06mci
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.06mci
Abstract
A notable feature of the participatory communication repertoire developed by the Occupy movement is known as the “Human Microphone” or
“People’s Mic”, reminiscent of the call-and-response format of action. A collection was made of more than 160 online amateur videos
recorded at an Occupy protest site or event in which the Human Mic and the disaffiliative “mic check” were used in diverse ways. In 19
separate cases, more than one video recording was independently uploaded of the same event, thus giving a unique insight into the
constitution of participation in a collective (and yet potentially dissensual) politico-interactional space from disparate
technology-mediated spatial positions at the site. Ethnomethodological conversation analysis (EMCA) is used to analyse the social
interactional accomplishment and collective organisation of the ‘voice’ of the Human Mic, including its propagation to larger audiences
and its interdiscursive translation into new settings as a strategic tool of political communication that attempts to ‘occupy’
institutional speech.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Occupy and the ‘Human Microphone’
- 3.Data collection
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Doing the Human Mic
- 4.2HM relays and the ‘mic-check’
- 4.3Doing the disaffiliative ‘mic-check’
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (16)
Atkinson, John M.. 1984. Our Master’s Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.
Clayman, Steven E. 1993. “Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response.” American Sociological Review 581: 110–130.
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fairclough, Norman. 1996. “Technologisation of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 71–83. London: Routledge.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jones, Nikki, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “‘The Camera Rolls’: Using Third-Party Video in Field Research.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 642 (1): 109–123. .
Llewellyn, Nick. 2005. “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology 39 (4): 697–716.
Lomax, Helen, and Neil Casey. 1998. “Recording Social Life: Reflexivity and Video Methodology.” Sociological Research Online 3 (2). [URL] [Date accessed: 17 May 2010].
Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2011. “Doing is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategic Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement.” Social Movement Studies 10 (1): 1–20.
McIlvenny, Paul. 1996. “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society 251: 27–60.
Nardone, Michael. 2012. Repetition and Difference: On the Human Microphone as Interventionist Form. Available online: [URL] [Date accessed: 25 April 2015].
Reynolds, Edward J. 2013. Enticing a Challengeable: Instituting Social Order as a Practice of Public Conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. School of Journalism and Communication: The University of Queensland.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Steinberg, Rebecca L. 2014. “The Occupy Assembly: Discursive Experiments in Direct Democracy.” Journal of Language and Politics 13 (4): 702–731. .
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
