Cover not available

Article published In: The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology
Edited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 19–39

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Hardballs and softballs

Modulating adversarialness in journalistic questioning

 | UCLA
 | UCLA
Published online: 25 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.02cla
Abstract
The design of questions in news interviews and news conferences has proven to be an illuminating window into the tenor of press-state relations. Quantitative studies have charted aggregate variations in adversarial questioning, but less is known about variations in the intensity of adversarialness within any particular question. Such variation is captured by the vernacular distinction between “hardball” versus “softball” questions. Hardballs advance an oppositional viewpoint vigorously, while softballs do so at most mildly. In this paper we investigate recurrent language practices through which journalists modulate the oppositionality of a question, thereby either hindering or facilitating response. The objective is to better understand how adversarialness is enacted in direct encounters between politicians and journalists.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Adversarial Viewpoints: Articulated Versus Advocated
  • 3.Elaborating factualistic Grounds
  • 4.From factualistic grounds to adversarial conclusion
  • 5.Soliciting response: Hardening/softening by inviting affirmation/rejection
  • 6.Soliciting response: Hardening/softening by implicating the difficulty/ease of response
  • 7.Vernacular characterizations revisited: The subversiveness of a “simple question”
  • 8.Discussion
  • References
References (33)
References
Bolden, Galina, Jenny Mandelbaum, and Sue Wilkinson. 2012. “Pursuing a Response By Repairing an Indexical Reference.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(2): 137–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1988. “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35(4): 474–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.” Media, Culture, and Society 241: 191–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002a. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures On the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002b. “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication 52(4): 749–775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie McDonald. 2006. “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 361: 561–583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., John Heritage, Marc N. Elliott, and Laurie McDonald. 2007. “When Does the Watchdog Bark?: Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 721: 23–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., Marc Elliott, John Heritage, and Megan Beckett. 2010. “A Watershed in White House Journalism: Explaining the Post-1968 Rise of Aggressive Presidential News.” Political Communication 271: 229–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conza, Angiola Di, Augusto Gnisci, and Angelo Caputo. 2011. “Interviewers Use of Coercive Questioning During a Midterm Period Favorable to the Opposition Party.” In Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces, ed. by A. Esposito, 147–154. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekström Mats. 2011. “Hybridity as a Resource and Challenge in a Talk Show Political Interview.” In Talking Politics in Broadcast Media, ed. by Mats Ekström, and Marianna Patrona, 135–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekström, Mats, Göran Eriksson, Bengt Johansson, and Patrik Wikström. 2012. “Biased Interrogations? A Multi-Methodological Approach on Bias in Election Campaign Interviews.” Journalism Studies 14(3): 423–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksson, Göran. 2011a. “Adversarial Moments: A Study of Short-Form Interviews in the News.” Journalism 12(1): 51–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Follow-Up Questions in Political Press Conferences.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3331–3344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksson, Göran, and Johan Östman. 2013. “Cooperative or Adversarial? Journalists’ Enactment of the Watchdog Function in Political News Production.” International Journal of Press/Politics 18(3): 304–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. “Constituency and Turn Increments.” In The Language of Turns and Sequences, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 14–38. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2002. “Ad Hoc Inquiries: Two Preferences in the Design of Routine Questions in an Open Context.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, ed. by Douglas W. Maynard, Hanneke Houtkoop, Nora C. Schaeffer, and Johannes van der Zouwen, 313–334. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, Jeffrey Robinson, Marc Elliott, Megan Beckett, and Michael Wilkes. 2007. “Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: The Difference one Word Can Make.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(10): 1429–1433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Andrew Roth. 1995. “Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(1): 1–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huls, Erica and Jasper Varwijk. 2011. “Political Bias in TV Interviews.” Discourse and Society 22(1): 48–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2011. “Non-Neutrality and Argument in the Hybrid Political Interview,” Discourse Studies 13(3): 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kampf, Zahar, and Efrat Daskal. 2011. “When the Watchdog Bites: Insulting Politicians On Air.” In Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Mats Ekström and Marianna Patrona, 177–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2007. “Neutralism and Adversarial Challenges in the Political News Interview.” Discourse and Communication 1(4): 387–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaniuk, Tanya. 2013a. “Interviewee laughter and disaffiliation in broadcast news interviews.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn, and Elizabeth Holt, 201–220. London, England: Bloomsbury Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Pursuing Answers to Questions in Broadcast Journalism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(2): 144–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 2008. Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tolson, Andrew. 2012. “You’ll Need a Miracle to Win this Election.” (J. Paxman 2005): Interviewer Assertiveness in UK General Elections 1983–2010.” Discourse, Context, and Media 11: 45–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth. 2004. “On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 147–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Beck Nielsen, Søren
2025. Contradicting potential climate misinformation during televised debates. Pragmatics and Society 16:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2025. Using formulations to maximize differences of opinion during televised climate change panel interviews. Journalism 26:3 ► pp. 676 ff. DOI logo
Patrona, Marianna
2025. ‘Softballs’ for ‘Hardballs’: The congenial political interview on right-wing partisan TV news outlets. Journalism 26:3 ► pp. 562 ff. DOI logo
D’Agostino, Giulia, Ella Schad, Eimear Maguire, Costanza Lucchini, Andrea Rocci & Chris Reed
2024. Superquestions and some ways to answer them. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:3 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Len-Ríos, María E., Rico Neumann & Solyee Kim
2024. Challenging Politicians on Race in Interviews: Social Dominance Orientation, Perceived Journalistic Credibility, Bias, and Appropriateness. Journalism Practice 18:2 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Hepburn, Alexa, Jonathan Potter & Marissa Caldwell
2023. The Visible Politics of Intersubjectivity: Constructing Knowledge as Shared to Manage Resistance in News Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42:5-6 ► pp. 544 ff. DOI logo
Wan, Helen
2023. “Hypophora” and “question cascade” in Cantonese political discourse: the stance triangle and the use of rhetorical moves and utterance final particles. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2022. Assessments and actions: Instances from Arabic broadcast political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2023. ‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews. Discourse, Context & Media 56 ► pp. 100743 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Debing
2022. Achieving discourse truth in doing affiliated news interviews. Journalism 23:11 ► pp. 2400 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, John
2022. The Multiple Accountabilities of Action. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Kjeldsen, Jens E, Øyvind Ihlen, Sine N Just & and Anders Olof Larsson
2022. Expert ethos and the strength of networks: negotiations of credibility in mediated debate on COVID-19. Health Promotion International 37:2 DOI logo
Hernández, Alfonso
2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Hernández, Alfonso
2024. Journalists’ questions during crisis. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Clementson, David E
2019. Why Won’t You Answer the Question? Mass-Mediated Deception Detection After Journalists’ Accusations of Politicians’ Evasion. Journal of Communication 69:6 ► pp. 674 ff. DOI logo
Elsey, Christopher
2019. Mental health disclosure in the public eye: accounting for and managing absences from professional sporting competition. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11:4 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue