Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:6 (2017) ► pp.782–808
Linguistic landscape of Gezi Park protests in Turkey
A discourse analysis of graffiti
Published online: 27 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15037.sel
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15037.sel
Abstract
Gezi Park protests that rocked Turkey in 2013 left a significant mark in the country’s collective memory and contributed to the construction of a new language of political resistance. To challenge an increasingly authoritarian government, the protesters used novel repertoires of contention, particularly political graffiti. To better understand different types of linguistic and symbolic communication tools used in the public space during Gezi Park protests and their impact on different set of audiences, this article explores the following research questions: (i) What indexical properties are used in the languages used in graffiti, and what do they mean for understanding the various audiences that the protesters engaged? (ii) What counter-narratives are created in the graffiti produced during Gezi Park protests?
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background: 2013 Gezi Park protests
- 3.Theoretical framework: Language in the public sphere
- Graffiti as a form of transgressive writing
- 4.Data collection and analysis
- 5.The analysis of Gezi graffiti
- Language mixing and code-meshing in graffiti
- Appropriation of local and global pop culture
- Using political humor to highlight individual liberty restrictions
- Blurring of ideological boundaries through graffiti
- Police Brutality and Media Censorship in the Linguistic Landscape of Gezi
- Right to the City: Ownership of the Urban Space in Graffiti and Political Posters
- Target Audiences
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (25)
Backhaus, Peter. 2007. Linguistic Landscapes. A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Bayat, Asef. 2010. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Benford, Robert D. and David A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 261: 611–639.
Bhatia, Vijay K., John Flowerdew, and Rodney H. Jones. 2008. “Mediated Discourse Analysis.” In Advances in Discourse Studies, edited by Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew, and Rodney H. Jones, 229–232. London, UK: Routledge.
Ete, Hatem and Coşkun Taştan. 2013. Kurgu ile Gerçeklik Arasında Gezi Eylemleri [Gezi Movement between Construction and Reality]. Ankara: SETA Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı Yayınları [SETA Politics, Economics and Society Research Foundation Publishing].
Huebner, Thom. 2006. “Bangkok’s linguistics landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change.” In Linguistics landscape: a new approach to multilingualism, edited by Durk Gorter, 31–51. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Jaworski, Adam and Crispin Thurlow. 2010. Semiotic landscape. Language, image, space. NY: Continuum International Publishing.
Gorter, Durk. 2006. Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gruber, Christiane. 2013. “The Visual Emergence of the Occupy Gezi Movement: Part One, Oh Biber!” Jadaliyya accessed at [URL]
Hanauer, David. I. 2004. “Silence, voice and erasure: psychological embodiment in graffiti at the site of Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination.” The Arts in Psychotherapy 311: 29–35.
2011. “The discursive construction of the separation wall at abu dis: Graffiti as political discourse.” Journal of Language & Politics 10 (3): 301–321.
Kılıç, Özlem. 2013. Türkiye’nin Gezi’si: Gezi’ye bir de Her Açıdan Bakın [Turkey’s Gezi: Have a look at Gezi from Every Angle]. Istanbul: Postiga Yayınları.
Landry, Rodrigue and Richard Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 (1): 23–49.
Oktem, Kerem. 2013. “Why Turkey’s mainstream media chose to show penguins rather than protests.” The Guardian, June 9.
Ma, Eric K-w. 2002. “Translocal spatiality.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 5(2): 131–152.
Pennycook, Alastair. 2009a. “Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti.” In Linguistic landscape. Expanding the Scenery edited by Elana Shohamy and Durk Gorter, 302–312. London: Routledge.
. 2009b. “Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls.” In Semiotic landscape. Language, image, space edited by Adam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow, 137–150. New York: Continuum International Publishing.
Saygun, Atabey. 2013. “Kahrolsun Bağzı Şeyler” [Down with something or other!] accessed at [URL]
Scollon, Ron and Suzanne B. K. Scollon. 2003. Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, Elana, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni. 2010. Linguistic landscape in the city. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Shohamy, Elana and Durk Gorter. 2009. Linguistic landscape. Expanding the scenery. London: Routledge.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Arias Álvarez, Alba
Chen, Jining
Helm, Francesca
2025. The (in)visibility of solidarity struggles and refuge in the Linguistic Landscape of the Italian/French Western
Alps. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal
Lalić-Krstin, Gordana & Nadežda Silaški
Hanna Lantto, Paula Sjöblom, Jaana Vaahtera & Minna Hjort
Liang, Di
2025. Observing and interpreting jiāzhuàng as a semiotic device in small business signs. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal
Liao, Ran & Brian Hok-Shing Chan
Negele, Kevin
Bielenin-Lenczowska, Karolina
Byrne, Steven & Erika Marcet
Morlan, Marguerite & Steven Byrne
Miranda Correa, Melisa
2023. Contextual graffiti and collective action frames at the Chilean social outbreak in 2019. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:4 ► pp. 387 ff.
Jenzen, Olu, Itir Erhart, Hande Eslen-Ziya, Umut Korkut & Aidan McGarry
Themistocleous, Christiana
Zhang, Hong & Brian Hok-Shing Chan
2021. Protest graffiti, social movements and changing participation frameworks. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
