Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:2 (2017) ► pp.242–263
“Contesting the Cynicism of Neoliberalism”
A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of Press Representations of the Sino-US Currency Dispute
Published online: 21 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15010.liu
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15010.liu
Abstract
This article aims to expose the hegemony of neoliberalism in media discourse through a corpus-assisted discourse study of the representations of the Sino-US currency dispute in two newspapers – China Daily (CD) from China and The New York Times (NYT) from the US. The findings suggest that while neoliberal ideology can be identified in both CD and NYT, it is articulated and appropriated differently in the two newspapers to construct their respective stance towards the issue. Neoliberal beliefs are found pervading different levels of discourse (i.e., thematic, lexical and grammatical) in NYT to construct a combative stance towards China’s exchange rate policies. However, the hegemony of neoliberalism can also be detected through CD’s ambivalent stance towards change and the seemingly contradictory evaluation of the impact of exchange rate changes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Neoliberalization in China and the Sino-US currency dispute
- 3.Theoretical framework
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Data collection
- 4.2Analytic method
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Selective analysis of NYT
- 5.1.1“Law and order (G2.1)”
- 5.1.2“Evaluation: Unauthentic (A5.4−)”
- 5.1.3“Allowed (S7.4+)”
- 5.2Selective analysis of CD
- 5.2.1Ambivalent stance towards change
- 5.2.2Positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation of the impact
- 5.1Selective analysis of NYT
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (48)
Ayers, David F. 2005. “Neoliberal Ideology in Community College Mission Statements: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” The Review of Higher Education 28(4): 527–549.
2013. “From Governance to Competitiveness: A Diachronic Analysis of the Community College Discourse of Local.” Critical Discourse Studies 10(1): 99–116.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michael Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19(3): 273–306.
Block, David, John Gary, and Marnie Holborow. 2012. “Introduction.” In Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, ed. by David Block, John Gary, and Marnie Holborow, 1–13. London and New York: Routledge.
Brenner, Neil, and Nik Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’.” Antipode 341: 349–379.
Castree, Noel. 2006. “From Neoliberalism to Neoliberalization: Consolations, Confusions, and Necessary illusions.” Environmental and Planning A 38(1): 1–6.
. 2004. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism: Overdetermination, Transdisciplinarity and Textual Analysis.” In Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Lynne Young, and Claire Harrison, 103–122. London: Continuum.
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Studies”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Fowler, Roger, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew (eds). 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gounari, Panayota. 2006. “Contesting the Cynicism of Neoliberal discourse: Moving towards a Language of Possibility.” Studies in Language and Capitalism (1): 77–96.
. 2007. “Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 610(1): 21–44.
Holborow, Marnie. 2012. “What is Neoliberalism? Discourse, Ideology and the Real World.” In Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, ed. by David Block, John Gray, and Marnie Holborow, 14–32. London and New York: Routledge.
L’ Hôte, Emilie. 2010. “New Labour and Globalization: Globalist Discourse with a Twist?” Discourse and Society 21(4): 355–376.
Lee, Chin-Chuan, Joseph Man Chan, Clement Y.K. So, and Zhongdang Pan (eds). 2002. Global Media Spectacle: News War over Hong Kong. Albany: Sate University of New York Press.
Leys, Colin. 2003. Market-Driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest. London: Verso.
Liew, Leong. 2005. “China’s Engagement with Neo-liberalism: Path Dependency, Geography and Party Self-reinvention.” The Journal of Development Studies 41(2): 331–352.
Liu, Ming. 2015. “Scapegoat or Manipulated Victim? Metaphorical Representations of the Sino-US Currency Dispute in Chinese and American Financial News.” Text & Talk 35(3): 337–357.
Mulderrig, Jane. 2011. “Manufacturing Consent: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis of New Labour’s Educational Governance.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(6): 562–578.
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Corpora and Discourse, a Most Congruous Beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
Peck, Jamie. 2013. “Explaining (with) Neoliberalism.” Territory, Politics, Governance 1(2): 132–157.
Pei, Minxin. 2006. China’s Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Phelan, Sean. 2007a. “The Discursive Dynamics of Neo-liberal Consensus: Irish Broadsheet Editorials and the Privatization of Eircom.” Journal of Language and Politics 6(1): 7–28.
. 2007b. “The Discourses of Neoliberal Hegemony: The Case of the Irish Republic.” Critical Discourse Studies 4(1): 29–48.
. 2014. “Critiquing Neoliberalism: Three Interrogations and a Defense.” In Challenging Communication Research, ed. by Leah A. Lievrouw, 27–41. Pieterlen, Switerland: Peter Lang.
Prentice, Sheryl. 2010. “Using Automated Semantic Tagging in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Case Study on Scottish Independence from a Scottish Nationalist Perspective.” Discourse and Society 21(4): 405–437.
Rayson, Paul. 2003. “Matrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis through Corpus Comparison.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.
. 2008. “From Key Words to Key Semantic Domains.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549.
Steger, Manfred B., and Ravi K. Roy. 2010. Neoliberalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teo, Peter. 2000. “Racism in the News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in Two Australian Newspapers.” Discourse and Society 11(1): 7–49.
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst Rob, and Kruiger Tjark. 1987. Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Wang, Hui. 2003. China’s New Order: Society, Politics, and Economy in Transition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, and Christoph Ludwig. (1999). “Introduction.” In Challenges in a Changing World: Issues in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Christoph Ludwig, 11–19. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Hu, Ying & Hongfei Li
Hou, Zhide & Qianni Peng
Teo, Peter & Huimin Xu
Wang, Guofeng, Yilin Liu & Shengmeng Tu
Wu, Yuxi
Wu, Yuxi
Zhao, Xin
Chen, Fu & Guofeng Wang
Liu, Ming
2022. Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Liu, Ming & Jingyi Huang
Liu, Ming & Jingyi Huang
Ming, Liu & Jingxue Ma
2022. The politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Ming, Liu & Guofeng Wang
2022. An introduction to the special issue on “Language, Politics and Media: The Hong Kong protests”. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
