Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 15:6 (2016) ► pp.727–747
Nation-building and presidential rhetoric in Belarus
Published online: 9 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
Abstract
This paper studies the Belarusian nation as envisioned by the president in his political speeches delivered on the country’s Independence Day. The theoretical framework of the paper rests upon an understanding of the discursive construction of national identity. This analysis of the presidential speeches utilizes principles of the Discourse Historical Approach (DHA). As a special genre of texts, political speeches aim to offer normative guidance and a sense of societal consensus to the public. The paper reveals that in the construction of a national community in Belarus, the presidential speeches ambiguously refer to historical memory, socio-economic development, the political system and the country’s foreign relations.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Nationalism and political speeches
- Foundation of the analysis
- Political regime and nation-building in Belarus
- Nation-building and presidential rhetoric
- Historical memory
- Socio-economic development
- Political system
- Foreign relations
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgment
- Notes
References
References (53)
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Baranova, Olga. 2008. “Nationalism, Anti-Bolshevism or the Will to Survive? Collaboration in Belarus under the Nazi Occupation of 1941–1944.” European Review of History 15 (2): 113–28.
Bekus, Nelly. 2010. Struggle over Identity. The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness.” Budapest: CEU Press.
Benke, Gertraud. 2003. “From Prices and Prizes to Outmoded Things. Neutrality and Identity in the Speeches of Austrian Presidents on the National Holiday (26.10.) in the Second Republic.” In NATO, Neutrality and National Identity. The Case of Austria and Hungary, edited by András Kovács and Ruth Wodak, 103–46. Vienna: Böhlau.
Brass, Paul R. 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Brüggemann, Mark. 2010. “Koloniales sprachliches Erbe: Sprache und Nation in Lukaschenkas Belarus.” Osteuropa 60 (12): 69–80.
Buhr, Renee L., Victor Shadurski, and Steven Hoffman. 2011. “Belarus: An Emerging Civic Nation?” Nationalities Papers 39 (3): 425–40. .
Chang, Hui-Ching, and Rich Holt. 2009. “Taiwan and ROC: A Critical Analysis of President Chen Shui-Bien’s Construction of Taiwan Identity in National Speeches.” National Identities 11 (3): 301–30.
Chiari, Bernhard, and Robert Maier. 2004. “Volkskrieg und Heldenstädte: Zum Mythos des Großen Vaterländischen Krieges in Weißrußland.” In Mythen der Nationen. 1945 – Arena der Erinnerungen. Katalog zur Ausstellung im Deutschen Historischen Museum Berlin, 737–56. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag.
Distelberger, Teresa, Rudolf de Cillia, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “Österreichische Identitäten in politischen Gedenkreden des Jubiläumsjahres 2005.” In Gedenken im “Gedankenjahr”. Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten im Jubiläumsjahr 2005, edited by Rudolf de Cillia and Ruth Wodak, 29–78. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
Eke, Steven M., and Taras Kuzio. 2000. “Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies 52 (3): 523–47. .
Fairclough, Norman L. 2005. “Blair’s Contribution to Elaborating a New ‘Doctrine of International Community.’” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 41–63. .
Flowerdew, John. 2002. “Rhetorical Strategies and Identity Politics in the Discourse of Colonial Withdrawal.” Journal of Language and Politics 1 (1): 149–80. .
Forchtner, Bernhard. 2014. “Historia Magistra Vitae: The Topos of History as a Teacher in Public Struggles over Self- and Other Representation.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 19–43. London: Bloomsbury.
Goujon, Alexandra. 1999. “Language, Nationalism, and Populism in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 661–77. .
. 2010. “Memorial Narratives of WWII Partisans and Genocide in Belarus.” East European Politics & Societies 24 (1): 6–25. .
Hansen, Imke. 2008. “Die politische Planung der Erinnerung. Geschichtskonstruktion in Belarus zwischen Konflikt und Konsens.” Osteuropa 58 (6): 187–96.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1992. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ioffe, Grigory. 2003. “Understanding Belarus: Belarussian Identity.” Europe-Asia Studies 55 (8): 1241–72. .
. 2007a. “Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity.” East European Politics & Societies 21 (2): 348–81. .
. 2007b. “Unfinished Nation-Building in Belarus and the 2006 Presidential Election.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 48 (1): 37–58. .
Klymenko, Lina, and Sergiu Gherghina. 2012. “Determinants of Positive Attitudes towards an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Belarus.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 39 (2): 249–69. .
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Laruelle, Marlène. 2007. “Wiedergeburt per Dekret. Nationsbildung in Zentralasien.” Osteuropa 8–91: 139–54.
Leshchenko, Natalia. 2004. “A Fine Instrument: Two Nation-Building Strategies in Post-Soviet Belarus.” Nations and Nationalism 10 (3): 333–52. .
. 2008. “The National Ideology and the Basis of the Lukashenka Regime in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (8): 1419–33.
Lindner, Rainer. 1999. “Forum: New Directions in Belarusian Studies. Besieged Past: National and Court Historians in Lukashenka’s Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 631–47. .
Markwick, Roger. 2012. “The Great Patriotic War in Soviet and Post-Soviet Collective Memory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, edited by Dan Stone, 692–713. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 1999b. “National Awakening and National Consciousness in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 565–78. .
. 2009. “Outpost of Tyranny? The Failure of Democratization in Belarus.” Democratization 16 (4): 756–76. .
. 2012. “History, Memory, and the Second World War in Belarus.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 58 (3): 437–48. .
Matveeva, Anna. 2009. “Legitimising Central Asian Authoritarianism: Political Manipulation and Symbolic Power.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (7): 1095–1121.
Özkırımlı, Umut. 2010. Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reisigl, Martin. 2009. “Spoken Silences – Bridging Breaks. The Discursive Construction of Historical Continuities and Turning Points in Austrian Commemorative Speeches by Rhetorical Tropes.” In Justice and Memory Confronting Traumatic Pasts. An International Comparison, edited by Ruth Wodak and Gertraud Auer Borea, 213–40. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
. 2013. “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, 21:349–73. London: Sage.
. 2014. “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach. A Methodological Framework.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
Rentrop, Petra. 2004. “Arbeiten an der Erinnerung. Geschichte und kollektives Gedächtnis.” Osteuropa 54 (2): 146–57.
Riach, David. 2000. “Nation Building: Identity Politics in Belarus.” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 171: 49–63.
Sahm, Astrid. 1999. “Political Culture and National Symbols: Their Impact on the Belarusian Nation-Building Process.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 649–60.
. 2008. “Im Banne des Krieges: Gedenkstätten und Erinnerungskultur in Belarus.” Osteuropa 58 (6): 229–45.
Shenhav, Shaul. 2005. “Thin and Thick Narrative Analysis. On the Question of Defining and Analyzing Political Narratives.” Narrative Inquiry 15 (1): 75–99.
Stuckey, Mary E. 2004. Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally. Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 65–91. .
Weiss, Gilbert. 2002. “Searching for Europe: The Problem of Legitimisation and Representation in Recent Political Speeches on Europe.” Journal of Language and Politics 1 (1): 59–83. .
Wodak, Ruth. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis: Challenges and Perspectives.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, xix–xliii. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Dinerstein, Anton & Todd L. Sandel
Kananovich, Volha
Panao, Rogelio Alicor L. & Ronald A. Pernia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
