Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 15:6 (2016) ► pp.667–687

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Infelicitous talk

Politicians’ words and the media ecology in three British political gaffes

 | University of Leicester
Published online: 9 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.01hut
Abstract
This article explores how the mediatisation of politics is evolving by analysing the different ways in which three political “gaffes” in recent British politics have been configured by the media environment. The article draws on theories suggesting that contemporary political action is enveloped by media scrutiny and the technological forms of mediation are diversified and hybridised rather than concentrated and uniform. Using case studies, the analysis examines the varying ways in which the broadcast interview can be part of a wider ecology of media technologies that afford an expanding range of discursive strategies for the negative construal of political actions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Total mediatisation and infelicitous talk
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Gaffe configuration 1: Television and the press
  • 5.Gaffe configuration 2: Television, radio, the press, “the tape” and the net
  • 6.Gaffe configuration 3: Television, the press, the net, bloggery and tweetery
  • 7.Total mediatisation, media management and media ethics
  • References
References (38)
References
Atkinson, Paul, and David Silverman. 1997. “Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self.” Qualitative Inquiry, 3 (3): 304–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooker, Charlie. 2011. “The Ed Miliband loop and the media reality deficit.” The Guardian, 3 July 2011.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter. 2008. “Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (3): 333–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2011. “The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British prime minister and the Bullygate affair.” International Journal of Press/Politics, 16 (1): 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The Hybrid Media System. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1988. “Displaying neutrality in television news interviews.” Social Problems, 35 (4): 474–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. “From talk to text: Newspaper accounts of reporter-source interactions.” Media, Culture and Society, 12 (1): 79–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. “Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability.” Journal of Communication, 45 (3): 118–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and Jack Whalen. 1989. “When the medium becomes the message: The case of the Rather-Bush encounter.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22 (1): 241–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corner, John, Kay Richardson, and Katy Parry. 2013. “Comedy, the civic subject, and generic mediation.” Television and New Media, 14 (1): 31–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekström, Mats. 2001. “Politicians interviewed on television news.” Discourse and Society, 12 (4): 563–584. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2014. “Groundhog day: Extended repetitions in political news interviews.” Journalism Studies, 15 (1): 82–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekström, Mats, Asa Kroon, and Mats Nylund, (eds). 2006. News from the Interview Society. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksson, Göran. 2011. “Adversarial moments: A study of short-form interviews in the news.” Journalism, 12 (1): 51–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksson, Göran, and Johan Östman. 2013. “Cooperative or adversarial? Journalists’ enactment of the watchdog function in political news production.” International Journal of Press/Politics, 18 (3): 304–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garton, Greg, Martin Montgomery, and Andrew Tolson. 1991. “Ideology, scripts and metaphors in the public sphere of a general election.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 100–118. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1986. “Aspects of topical organisation in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees.” Media, Culture and Society, 8 (4): 441–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “A turn-taking system for British news interviews.” Language in Society, 17 (4): 401–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Damon. 2011. “To a TV reporter…” [URL], 1/7/2011. Accessed 6.11.2014.
Harris, Sandra. 1991. “Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1985. “Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis Volume 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2001. “Technologies, texts and affordances.” Sociology, 35 (4): 441–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroon Lundell, Asa, and Mats Ekström. 2010. “Interview bites in television news production and presentation.” Journalism Practice, 4 (4): 476–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2007. The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mullaney, Louise. 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1989. “Constructing skepticism: Four devices used to engender the audience’s skepticism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22 (1): 293–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porter, Andrew, and Rosa Prince. 2010. “General Election 2010: Gordon Brown’s Gillian Duffy ‘bigot’ gaffe may cost Labour.” Daily Telegraph, 28 April 2010.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2007. “Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interview.” Discourse and Communication, 1 (3): 387–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Duncan. 2011. “Ed Miliband tongue-tied on strikes.” New Statesman, 30 June 2011. [URL]. Accessed 12.1.2015.
Sanders, Robert, and Kristine Fitch, (eds). 2004. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scannell, Paddy. 1991. “Introduction: The relevance of talk.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1989. “From interview to confrontation: Observations on the Bush/Rather encounter.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22 (1): 215–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper. 2008. “Four phases of mediatisation: An analysis of the mediatisation of politics.” International Journal of Press/Politics, 13 (3): 228–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, John. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2014. The Discourse of Public Participation Media: From Talk Show to Twitter. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Tincheva, Nelly
2025. Political language gaffes and the importance of Hearer’s meaning. Pragmatics and Society 16:3 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Hayden, Nikita, Jill Bradshaw, Sarah Hayward, Joan Murphy, Sally Boa, Viktoria Eden, Norman Alm, Eliada Pampoulou & Susanne Mischo
2024. A narrative review on analysing and reporting research conducted using Talking Mats®, an inclusive communication tool. Technology and Disability 36:3 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele
2022. Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
McVittie, Chris & Andy McKinlay
2019. ‘Alternative facts are not facts’: Gaffe-announcements, the Trump administration and the media. Discourse & Society 30:2 ► pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Temmerman, Martina, Renée Moernaut, Roel Coesemans & Jelle Mast
2019. Post-truth and the political: Constructions and distortions in representing political facts. Discourse, Context & Media 27 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue