Article published In: Multimodality, Politics and Ideology
Edited by David Machin and Theo van Leeuwen
[Journal of Language and Politics 15:3] 2016
► pp. 352–368
When corporations come to define the visual politics of gender
The case of Getty Images
Published online: 4 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.08aie
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.08aie
Abstract
While stock photographs have come to saturate media and have been mocked for their clichéd nature, for example where women are pictured laughing alone with salad, a powerful corporation like Getty Images that disseminates commercial imagery globally has sought to challenge these stereotypes by making more politicized images. This article examines one such case, that is, Getty’s Genderblend visual trend, which claims to portray gender identities and relations in ways that are both more inclusive and diverse, harnessing feminist theory as part of its promotion. Taking a multimodal discourse and visual design approach, the article looks at how corporate imagery can be styled as political and, in turn, how a politics of difference itself is shaped in the interests of the ideologies of consumer capitalism.
Keywords: Getty Images, multimodality, gender, transgender, feminism, stock images, design, neo-liberalism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Setting the stage: Genderblend at the crossroads of politics and marketing
- 3.Aims and approach
- 4.Politicizing stock photography in promotional discourse: ‘Blurring’ and ‘flipping’ as key tropes
- 5.Designing generic difference in visual images: Typing, juxtaposition, texturization
- 5.1Typing: Using attributes to define the identities of portrayed subjects
- 5.2Juxtaposition: Making comparisons to highlight deviations from the norm
- 5.3Texturization: Conferring texture to emphasize material and physical specificity
- 6Conclusion: The uneven gender politics of stock photography
- Acknowledgements
References
References (25)
Aiello, Giorgia, and Pauwels, Luc. 2014. “Special issue: Difference and globalization.” Visual Communication 13(3): 275–285.
Aiello, Giorgia. 2013. “Generiche differenze: La comunicazione visiva della soggettività lesbica nell’archivio fotografico Getty Images.” Studi Culturali anno X n. 3: 523–548.
. 2012. “The ‘other’ Europeans: The semiotic imperative of style in Euro Visions by Magnum Photos.” Visual Communication 11(1): 49–77.
Barmada, Nadia. November 19, 2014. Creative in Focus | Discover the key 2015 visual trends. Retrieved from: [URL]
Djonov, Emilia, and van Leeuwen, Theo. 2011. “The semiotics of texture: From tactile to visual.” Visual Communication 10(4): 541–564.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Frosh, Paul. 2003. The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry. Oxford: Berg.
. 2013. “Beyond the image bank: Digital commercial photography.” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, second edition, ed. by Martin Lister, 131–148. London and New York: Routledge.
Getty Images. 20 October, 2014. Webinar | Creative in Focus: 2015 Visual Trends Briefing. Visual Insights, Getty Images. Retrieved from: [URL]
. 19 February, 2015. Webinar | Genderblend – the new visual language of gender marketing. Visual Insights, Getty Images. Retrieved from: [URL]
Grossman, Pamela. Genderblend. In Creative in Focus, Getty Images iBook. Retrieved from: [URL]
Grossman, Pam. 26 February, 2015. Images that ‘Genderblend’: Trend Analysis. Visual Insights, Getty Images. Retrieved from: [URL]
. 23 March, 2015. Gender fluidity goes POP: Celebrating cliché-busting media and brands. Visual Insights, Getty Images. Retrieved from: [URL]
Grossman, Samantha. December 8, 2014. “Women laughing alone with tablets’ is the new ‘women laughing alone with salad.” TIME.com. Retrieved from: [URL]
Hansen, Anders, and Machin, David. 2008. “Visually branding the environment: Climate change as a marketing opportunity.” Discourse Studies 10(6): 777–794.
Hooper, Lee. 4 March, 2015. Five brands who get girls right. Expert Insider, Getty Images. Retrieved from: [URL]
Kress, Gunther, and van Leeuwen, Theo. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design
, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Lazar, Michelle. 2014. “Recuperating feminism, reclaiming femininity: Hybrid postfeminist I-dentity in consumer advertisements.” Gender and Language 2(2014): 205–224.
Machin, David. 2004. “Building the world’s visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media.” Visual Communication 3(3): 316–336.
Merrill, Guy. 16 March, 2015. As brands smudge gender lines, don’t forget the kids. Visual Insights, Getty Images. Retrieved from: [URL]
Sachs, Mary-Lee. June 27, 2014. Getty Images a cliché-killer at Cannes. Forbes.com. Retrieved from: [URL]
Seymour, Tom. May 7, 2015. Getty and Instagram partner on photography grants worth $10,000. British Journal of Photography. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Elmously, Asmaa
Fawzy, Rania Magdi
Fawzy, Rania Magdi & Asmaa Elmously
Moorhead, Laura L. & Joshua Davis
Allemann-Ravi, Vidya, Vinzenz Rast & Ursina Kellerhals
Furia, Paolo & Alberto Romele
Sibai, Dina & Sylvia Jaworska
Aiello, Giorgia, Crispin Thurlow & Lara Portmann
Aiello, Giorgia & Theo Van Leeuwen
Albawardi, Areej & Rodney H Jones
Bowie, Anneli
Kvåle, Gunhild
Mortensen, Tara Marie, Brian P. McDermott & Khadija Ejaz
Romele, Alberto & Marta Severo
Curran, Ann
Ren, Qumo
Romele, Alberto
Sternadori, Miglena & Alan Abitbol
Carrera, Fernanda
Thomas, Martin
Bogers, Loes, Sabine Niederer, Federica Bardelli & Carlo De Gaetano
Mapes, Gwynne
Runge, Evelyn
Yang, Kaiyu, Klint Qinami, Li Fei-Fei, Jia Deng & Olga Russakovsky
McIntyre, Karen, Kyser Lough & Keyris Manzanares
Sánchez-Querubín, Natalia & Richard Rogers
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
