Article published In: Multimodality, Politics and Ideology
Edited by David Machin and Theo van Leeuwen
[Journal of Language and Politics 15:3] 2016
► pp. 304–321
Humour, ridicule and the de-legitimization of the working class in Swedish Reality Television
Published online: 4 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.05eri
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.05eri
Abstract
Drawing on tools from Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis this paper analyses the editing techniques in a Swedish docu-soap showing that humour is used to ridicule the working-class participants, representing them as slow, inflexible, undynamic and unstylish. The paper places this within broader discursive shifts in Sweden where the rise of neoliberalism requires a dismantling of the welfare state, legitimized partly though establishing the lower social economic groups as morally flawed and themselves responsible for their increasingly disadvantaged situation as social inequalities increase.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The making of social class through ridicule
- 3.The case and methodology
- 4.Ridiculing the working class
- 4.1Music frames actions and suggests mental states
- 4.2Re-sequencing of scenes
- 4.3Camera work
- 5.Concluding comments
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (30)
Bennett, Joe. 2013. Chav-spotting in Britain: the representation of social class as private choice. Social Semiotics 23 (1), 146–162.
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage Publications.
Eriksson, Göran. 2015. Ridicule as a strategy for the recontextualization of the working class: A multimodal analysis of class-making on Swedish reality television. Critical Discourse Studies 12(1), 20–38.
Kress, Günther, & van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and the Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
Lawler, Stephanie. 2005. Disgusted subjects: the making of middle-class identities. Sociological Review 531: 429–446.
Levitas, Ruth. 1998. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lockyer, Sharon. 2010. Dynamics of social class contempt in contemporary British television comedy. Social Semiotics 20 (2), 121–138.
Lyle, Samantha A. 2008. (Mis)recognition and the middle-class/bourgeois gaze: A case study of Wife Swap. Critical Discourse Studies 5 (4): 319–330.
. 2013. What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 10 (4), 347–355.
Machin, David. & Mayr, Andrea. 2013. Personalising crime and crime-fighting in factual television: an analysis of social actors and transitivity in language and images. Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4), 356–372.
Menninghaus, Winfried. 2003. Disgust: Theory, and history of strong sensation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Östberg, Kjell, & Andersson, Jenny. 2013. Sveriges Historia 1965–2012 [The History of Sweden 1965–2012]. Stockholm Norstedts förlag.
. 2005. The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation. Sociology 391, 965–982.
Skeggs, Beverly, & Wood, Helen. 2011. Introduction: Real class. In Reality television and class, ed. by Helen Wood, and Beverly Skeggs, 1–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tyler, Imogen. 2008. “Chav mum chav scum”: Class disgust in contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies 81, 17–34.
. 2008. Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. & Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Wingstedt, Johnny, Brändström, Sture, and Berg, Jan. 2010. Narrative Music, Visuals and Meaning in Film, Visual Communication 9 (2), 192–210.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Daly, John Scott
Dong, Wei
Lin, Yi
Dong, Wei & Margreth Lünenborg
Eriksson, Göran
Varga, Balázs
Łuczaj, Kamil
Er, Ibrahim
Aitaki, Georgia
Jontes, Dejan & Andreja Trdina
Lindell, Johan & Jan Fredrik Hovden
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
