Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 15:2 (2016) ► pp.173–192

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

People’s right to keep and bear arms

Arguments on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution in District of Columbia v. Heller

 | University of Tartu
Published online: 9 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.2.03poi
The article presents an analysis of the majority and minority opinions from the Supreme Court of the United States issued on District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. The court case addressed the meaning of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution that establishes gun rights in a famously confusing wording. The analysis applies parts of Fairclough and Fairclough’s (2011, 2012) model of analysing argumentation and also discusses intertextuality to account for how the justices construct their arguments. The analysis shows how the justices shape their arguments on the basis of their values and beliefs, presenting contradictory readings of the amendment, sources of evidence and the preferred application of the amendment.
References (59)
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2004. “The Passionate Intensity of the Confirmation Process”. Jurist. Accessed June 22, 2011, [URL].
Balter, S. J. 2001. “The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson.” Argumentation 15 (4): 381–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2001. The Supreme Court. 7th Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2003. “Political Communication.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. by David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis, 222–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. N.d. [1765]. “Commentaries on the Law of England.” Accessed June 22, 2011, [URL].
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Michael S. 2001. “The Strange Case of United States v. Miller.” Accessed February 16, 2008, [URL].
Cress, Lawrence Delbert. 1984. “An Armed Community: The Origins and Meaning of the Right to Bear Arms The Journal of American History 71 (1): 22–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1999. Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Data. A Guide for Analysis, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 229–266. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Semiosis, Ideology and Mediation: A Dialectical View.” In Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies, ed. by Inger Lassen, Jeanne Strunck, and Torben Vestergaard, 19–35. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2011. “Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse: The UK Government’s Response to the Economic Crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report.” Discourse and Society 22 (3): 243–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Lilie Chouliaraki. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freitas, Lúcia Gonçalves. 2014. “Argumentation and Discourse on the Maria da Penha Act in Decisions of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice.” Bakhtiniana 9 (1): 75–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodges, Adam. 2008. “The Politics of Recontextualisation: Discursive Competition over Claims of Iranian Involvement in Iraq.” Discourse & Society 19 (4): 483–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The “War on Terror” Narrative. Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2013. Review of Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough’s Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Journal of Language and Politics 12 (2): 295–304.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986. “Word, Dialogue and Novel.” In The Kristeva Reader, ed. by Toril Moi, 34–61. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang,Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1989. “The Embarrassing Second Amendment.” The Yale Law Journal 99 (3): 637–659.
Levy, Robert A. 2007. “The D.C. Gun Ban: Supreme Court Preview.” Accessed August 23, 2012, [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, Robert A, Ilya Shapiro, and Roger Pilon. 2009. “National Rifle Association v. City of Chicago; McDonald v. City of Chicago.” Accessed June 8, 2011, [URL].
Martinez Guillem, Susana. 2009. “Argumentation, Metadiscourse and Social Cognition: Organizing Knowledge in Political Communication.” Discourse & Society 20 (6): 727–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mootz, Francis J., III.2010. “Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4), 383–402.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul, and Caryl Emerson. 1990. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm. 1980. Justice, Law, and Argument. Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Põiklik, Pille. 2011. “The Unalienable Right to Keep and Bear Arms? Interpreting the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in the Light of American Ideals.” Estonian Journal of English Studies 2 (1): 110–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Recontextualisation of the Second Amendment and Supreme Court Decisions in The New York Times.” Brno Studies in English 38 (1): 23–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Space and Positioning in Media Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Second Amendment Court Cases in The New York Times. PhD Dissertation, University of Tartu. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties.” Controversia 2 (6), 45–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 2008. “The Opinion of the Court in District of Columbia et al., Petitioners v. Dick Anthony Heller. 554 U.S.__(2008).” Accessed August 5, 2012, [URL].
Scollon, Ron. 2001. Mediated Discourse. The Nexus of Practice. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shalhope, Robert E. 1982. “The Ideological Origins of the Second Amendment.” The Journal of American History 69 (3): 599–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sirovich, Lawrence. 2003. “A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court.” PNAS 100 (13): 7432–7437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, John P. 2008. “Dissenting Opinion in District of Columbia et al., Petitioners v. Dick Anthony Heller. 554 U.S.__(2008).” Accessed August 5, 2012, [URL].
Target Point Consulting. N.d. “The Ideological History of the Supreme Court, 1937–2007.” Accessed July 12, 2011, [URL].
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2008. The Nine. Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. “Discourse, Context and Cognition.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2009. “The Study of Argumentation.” In The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, ed. by Andrea A. Lunsford, Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa A. Eberly, 109–124. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rees, M. Agnes. 2007. “Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Theory: The Case of Television Talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1454–1463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rees, Agnes. 2010. Dissociation in Argumentative Discussions. A Pragma-Dialectic Perspective. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak. 2007. “Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 1–32. Hampshire and London: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, David C. 2003. Mythic Meanings of the Second Amendment: Taming Political Violence in a Constitutional Republic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam. 2007. “Scrutinizing the Second Amendment.” Michigan Law Review 105 (4): 683–733.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Heller’s Catch 22 .” UCLA Law Review 561: 1550–1577.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woll, Peter. 1990. American Government. Readings and Cases. 10th Edition. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žagar, Igor Ž. 2010. “Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Tarrant, Stella
2018. A strange right to bear arms: District of Columbia v Heller as narrative. Griffith Law Review 27:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue