Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 14:4 (2015) ► pp.501–527

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The in-group and out-groups of the British National Party and the UK Independence Party

A corpus-based discourse-historical analysis

 |  | Lund University |
 |  | Lund University |
Published online: 11 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.4.02eng
This article investigates the self-presentation and the construction of immigration discourses in articles and policy documents published by the British National Party (BNP) and the UK Independence Party (UKIP). By combining corpus analysis with the Discourse-Historical Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis, a picture emerges of two parties whose use of language is governed by the same principle of differentiation. Fundamental to the BNP’s and UKIP’s language is the dichotomy in-group/out-group. The in-group analysis investigates the parties’ choice of form of self-representation, claims to unique competence, denial of attributes and mutual perception. The out-group analysis shows how the parties construct immigration, and focuses on the aspects of legal status, quantification and origin. The analyses suggest considerable lexical and conceptual similarities in both in-group and out-group formation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature Review
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus analysis: The in-group and out-group perspective
    • 3.2The Discourse-Historical Approach to CDA
  • 4.The BNP-UKIP Corpus
  • 5.The In-Group Analysis: The BNP and UKIP
    • 5.1Forms of self-reference
    • 5.2Unique competence
    • 5.3Denial of attributes
    • 5.4Mutual perceptions
  • 6.The Out-Group Analysis: Immigration
    • 6.1Naming immigrants and the purpose of attribution
    • 6.2Legal status
    • 6.3Quantification
    • 6.4Origin
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (31)
References
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273-306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197-226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biggs, Michael, and Steven Knauss. 2012. “Explaining Membership in the British National Party: A Multilevel Analysis of Contact and Threat.” European Sociological Review 28 (5): 633-646. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BNP. n.d. Racism Cuts Both Ways: The Scandal of Our Age. Retrieved from [URL].
Burgess, Ernest W., and Robert E. Park. 1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copsey, Nigel. 2004. Contemporary British Fascism: The British National Party and the Quest for Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Introduction.” In The British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Nigel Copsey and Graham Macklin, 1-15. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copsey, Nigel and Graham Macklin (eds). 2011. The British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cross, Colin. 1961. The Fascists in Britain. London: Barrie and Rockliff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Geraint O. 2012. “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the Construction of ‘In-Groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 Manifestos of the British National Party.” Discourse & Society 23 (3): 245-258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Jocelyn, and Matthew J. Goodwin. 2012. From Voting to Violence? Far Right Extremism in Britain. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, and Michael J. Goodwin. 2010. “Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party.” Political Studies 58 (1): 1-25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, Matthew J. Goodwin, and David Cutts. 2012. “Strategic Eurosceptics and Polite Xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (2): 204-234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Michael. J. 2011. New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffin, Roger. 1991. The Nature of Fascism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halikiopoulou, Daphne, and Sofia Vasilopoulou. 2010. “Towards a ‘Civic’ Narrative: British National Identity and the Transformation of the British National Party.” The Political Quarterly 81 (4): 583-592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, Peter, Helen Margetts, David Rowland, and Stuart Weir. 2006. The BNP: The Roots of its Appeal. Essex: University of Essex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, Peter, and Helen Margetts. 2009. “The Latent Support for the Extreme Right in British Politics.” West European Politics 32 (3): 496-513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linehan, Thomas P. 2000. British Fascism, 1918-1939: Parties, Ideology and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Michael Meyer and Ruth Wodak, 87-122. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhodes, James. 2009. “The Banal National Party: The Routine Nature of Legitimacy.” Patterns of Prejudice 43 (2): 142-160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2011. “Race and Racial Difference: The Surface and Depth of BNP Ideology.” In The British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Nigel Copsey and Graham Macklin, 38-61. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Racial Populism in British Fascist Discourse: The Case of COMBAT and the British National Party (1960-1967).” In Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. by John E. Richardson and Ruth Wodak, 181-203. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “Recontextualising Fascist Ideologies of the Past: Right-Wing Discourses on Employment and Nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 251-267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Richard. 1987. Fascism in Britain: A History, 1918-1985. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UNHCR. 1951 Asylum Seekers. Retrieved from [URL]. Retrieved September 14, 2012.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zauner, Adolf. 1903. “Die romanischen Namen der Körperteile: eine onomasiologische Studie.” Romanische Forschungen 141: 339-530.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

van Dijk, Teun A.
2025. Discourse and Ideologies of the Radical Right, DOI logo
Billig, Michael
2023. The national nature of globalization and the global nature of nationalism: Historically and methodologically entangled. Theory & Psychology 33:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Bangjun & Yuan Tao
2023. National Identity in Media Discourses from Russia and Ukraine: Amid the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian War. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:3 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
A’Beckett, Ludmilla
2019. Displaced Ukrainians. In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Degrees of European belonging [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 91], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue