Cover not available

Article published In: Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements
Edited by Luisa Martín Rojo
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:4] 2014
► pp. 814–836

Framing and blaming in times of economic crisis

The rise and fall of the “Rudd Recession”

 | Macquarie University |
Published online: 20 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.10mur
This article takes a critical approach to the language used by Australian politicians during the global financial crisis of 2007–8. Critical periods in history provide a rich substrate for the appearance of new expressions with the potential to frame the debate, influencing the ways events are interpreted and blame attributed. Passing unnoticed into usage, such memes have the potential to become part of unexamined background knowledge and covertly co-opt hearers and users into shared systems of value and belief. The study focusses on one specific neologism deployed by opposition politicians, firstly in an attempt to create the erroneous impression that a recession was occurring and secondly that it was the fault of the Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd. Patterns of occurrence were tracked against local and international events, indicating a life cycle with several distinct phases: chance emergence, a strategic deployment, cross-genre diffusion, resistance and eventual rejection.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Discourse, crisis and blame
  • 2.Background context
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Trajectory of the RR
    • 4.1Preliminary occurrences
    • 4.2Phase 1: Isolated occurrence with media reproduction and minimal resistance
    • 4.3Phase 2: Intense strategic activity
    • 4.4Phase 3: Refutation, ridicule and disappearance
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (15)
References
Bounegru, Liliana, and Charles Forceville. 2011. “Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons Representing the Global Financial Crisis.” Visual Communication 101: 209–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd edn). UK: Pearson. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction: Vol. 2. Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun. A. van Dijk, pp. 258–284. London, UK: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena. 2011. “Alliteration in Inaugural Addresses: From George Washington to Barack Obama.” In Alliteration in Culture, ed. by Jonathan Roper. 45–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen. 2005. Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, Anna Triandafyllidou and Ruth Wodak. 2009. Introduction. In European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis ed. by Anna Triandafyllidou, Michał Krzyżanowski and Ruth Wodak, pp. 1–10. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lischinsky, Alon. 2011. In Times of Crisis: A Corpus Approach to the Construction of the Global Financial Crisis in Annual Reports. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (3): 153–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 122–143. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael. 2009. “Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. (2nd edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 14–31 London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muñoz, Carmen Portero. 2011. “Noun-noun Euphemisms in the Language of the Global Financial Crisis.” Atlantis 33 (2): 137–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. “Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, 207–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Blaming and Denying: Pragmatics” In The Encyclopedia for Language and Linguistics (2nd ed), ed. by Keith Brown, 59–64. Cambridge University: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. UK/US: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Borriello, Arthur
2017. ‘There is no alternative’: How Italian and Spanish leaders’ discourse obscured the political nature of austerity. Discourse & Society 28:3 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Quest for Argumentative Equivalence [Argumentation in Context, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue