Article published In: Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements
Edited by Luisa Martín Rojo
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:4] 2014
► pp. 755–780
Persian Nationalism, Identity and Anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook Discourses
Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media Communication
Published online: 20 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.08kho
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.08kho
This study adopts a Critical Discourse Analytical approach to investigate how a form of Iranian national(ist) identity is (re)constructed and (re)presented on a popular Facebook Page called Persian Gulf. It focuses on linguistic practices of the Iranian side of the debate over the name of this body of water. After briefly discussing some of the challenges of applying CDA to a participatory web platform e.g. Facebook, This paper explores the characteristics of the Persian identity discourse in the way that it is utilised to legitimize the name Persian Gulf vs. the claim to the name Arabian Gulf. The paper concludes that the emergent Persian national/ist identity discourse is strongly preoccupied with opposing a perceived cultural invasion of the Arabic Other in its emphatic defence of the name Persian Gulf but in the meantime it aspires to distinguish itself from the officially propagated Islamic identity. It is also shown that aspects pertaining to powerfulness, defiance and conflict are the main thrusts of the discursive representation of this Self-identity.
Article outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Participatory media and critical data repositories
- 3. Social networking sites: Facebook
- 4. National identity
- 5. Persian Gulf: The name and debate
- 6. Facebook and data
- 7.Methods
- 8. Analysis and discussion
- 9.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (50)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2008. “Potentials and Limitations of Discourse-Centred Online Ethnography.” Language@Internet 5 (9). (urn:nbn:de:0009-7-16100).
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Michael Beibwenger. 2008. “Introduction: Data and Methods in Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis.” Language @ Internet 5 (2). (urn:nbn:de:0009-7-16090).
Barton, David, and Carmen Lee. 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London and New York: Routledge.
Boyd, dona. 2008. “Can Social Network Sites Enable Political Action?” Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 4.2 (2008): 241–244.
. 2011. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, London: Routledge. 39–58.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
Cottle, Simon, and David Nolan. 2007. “Global Humanitarianism and the Changing Aid Field: ‘Everyone was Dying for Coverage’.” Journalism Studies 8 (6): 862–878.
Cottle, Simon. 2011. “Media and the Arab Uprisings of 2011: Research Notes.” Journalism 12 (5): 647–659.
Dahlgren, Peter. 2009. Media and Political Engagement: Citizens Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duke, Vic, and Liz Crolley. 1996. Football, Nationality and the State. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Entman, Robert. M. 2002. “Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” In McQuail’s Reader in Mass Communication Theory, ed. by Denis McQuail, 390–397. London: SAGE.
Fairclough, Norman., Ruth Wodak, and Jane Mulderrig. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A Van Dijk, London: Sage, 357–378.
Georgalou, Mariza. 2009. “Scoring a Hat Trick: Nation, Football, and Critical Discourse Analysis.” Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 108–141.
Grad, Hector, and Louisa M. Rojo. 2008. “Identities in Discourse.” In Analysing Identities in Discourse, ed. by Rosana Dolon, and Julia Todoli, 28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hall, Stuart. 1973/1980. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 ed. by Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, 128–138. London: Hutchinson.
Herring, C. Susan. 2004. “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha Barab, Rob Kling, and James. H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahn, Richard, and Douglas Kellner. 2004. “New Media and Internetactivism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging.” New Media and Society, 6 (1): 87–95.
Kelsey, Darren, and Lucy Bennett. 2014. “Discipline and Resistance on Social Media: Discourse, Power and Context in the Paul Chambers ‘Twitter Joke Trial’.” Discourse, Context and Media 31: 37–45.
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2007. “Iran: Wobbly Mosaics of Ethnicity and Crisis of Identity. Iranian.com Feature.” Available at: [URL] (Last accessed 15/10/2014).
. 2009. “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers during the Balkan Conflict (1999) and the British General Election (2005).” Discourse and Society 20 (4): 477–498.
. 2010. “Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions, and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72.
. 2014a. “Immigration Discourses and Critical Discourse Analysis: Dynamics of World Events and Immigration Representations in the British Press.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap. London: Bloomsbury, 501–520.
. 2014b. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Power and New media Discourse: Issues and Debates.” In Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World, ed. by Monica. Kopytowska and Yusuf. Kalyango. New York: Peter Lang, 287–305.
. 2015 forthcoming, Discursive Construction of Iran’s Nuclear programme in the British and Iranian press. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Johann Unger. forthcoming. “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer. 3rd. Ed. London: SAGE.
Koteyko, Nelya. 2011. “Mining the Internet for Linguistic and Social Data: An Analysis of ‘Carboncompounds’ in Web Feeds.” In Discourse and Society 21 (6): 655–674.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Arnold Publication.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers.
MacCabe, Colin 1985. Theoretical Essays: Film, Linguistics, Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Maguire, Joseph. 1994. Sport, Identity Politics, and Globalization: Diminishing Contrasts and Increasing Varieties. Sociology of Sport Journal 11 (4): 398–427.
Mautner, Girlinde. 2005. “Time to Get Wired: Using Web-Based Corpora in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society 16 (6): 809–828.
Persian Gulf. Available at: [URL] (Last accessed 15/10/2014).
Rahimi, Babak, and Elham Gheytanchi. 2009. The Politics of Facebook in Iran. Open Democracy. Available at: [URL] (Last accessed 15/10/2014).
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: SAGE.
Richardson, John. E. 2013. Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text. London: Routledge.
Sreberny, Annabelle, and Gholam Khiabany. 2010. Blogistan: The Internet and Politics in Iran. New York: I.B. Tauris.
Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Ruth Wodak. 2003. “Focus: Studying Identity: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges.” In Language and Politics, ed. by A. Triandafyllidou, 2 (2): 205–223.
Thurlow, Crispin, and Kristine Mroczek. 2011. Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Unger, Johann 2012. “New Tools for Critical Discourse Studies in New Media Contexts.” CADAAD 2012, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA is about – a Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, London: SAGE, 1–14.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Mayer. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd edn). London: SAGE
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Garshasbi, Reza, Ali Karimi Maleh & Mohammad Taghi Ghezelsofla
Gu, Jiapei & Janet Ho
Oh, David C.
2019. White cyber-protest in a Facebook group. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Rahbari, Ladan, Chia Longman & Gily Coene
Venuti, Marco & Antonio Fruttaldo
Boukala, Salomi
2018. False reasoning and argumentation in the Twitter discourse of the Prime Minister of Israel. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Donehue, Tracey E.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
