Cover not available

Article published In: Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements
Edited by Luisa Martín Rojo
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:4] 2014
► pp. 702–731

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The Occupy Assembly

Discursive experiments in direct democracy

 | University of California, Los Angeles |
Published online: 20 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.06ste
A key feature of the Occupy movement has been the General Assembly (GA), in which participants, gathered in outdoor public space, engaged in emergent forms of direct deliberative democratic practice. GAs created opportunities for renewed, co-constructed discourses about human rights, collectivity and autonomy, and the nature of fairness. The physical, durative occupation of public space and establishment of encampments enabled participants to converse and collaborate meaningfully about these matters and their implications for action. An attested ideology of horizontalism was produced and reflected in practices of decision-making within a direct participatory democratic framework. The generation of local intersubjectivity and global solidarity as well as the embodied augmentation of personal and group agency were lodged within face-to-face interactions at Occupy GAs. Participants developed and adapted specific embodied tools for assembly use, including hand signals and the human mic, to facilitate a discursive praxis of egalitarianism within the context of a speech exchange system suited to a large outdoor deliberative body. These practices are central to the Occupy movement, as they constitute the discursive experiments in direct democracy set in motion by a shared recognition of social crisis and systemic injustice felt increasingly around the world. This paper examines how several embodied practices at Occupy Los Angeles attend to participants’ attested ideologies and the practical problems of open, large-group direct democracy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
  • 3.Space and the assembly
  • 4.Human mic
    • 4.1Ratification as Personal and Group Agency
    • 4.2Interexperience and intertelling
      • 4.2.1Transitive use of the mic-check
  • 5.Hand signals
    • 5.1Multiple/compound stances
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (46)
References
Appel, Hannah Chadeayne. 2011. “The People’s Microphone.” Social Text Journal Blog, October 13, 2011. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Axismundipost. 2011a. “Occupy Press Conference — L.A. Mayor and Police Chief mic-checked re: Occupy LA eviction (11/25/11).” 27:38, Nov 26. 2011. [URL].
. 2011b. “Occupy LA participants mic-check GA response to LA City during City Council public comment (11/29/11).” 15:18, Nov 30, 2011. [URL].
Chambers, Simone. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory”. Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1): 307–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 2002. “Sequence and Solidarity.” In Advances in Group Processes: Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity, ed. by E. J. Lawler, and S. R. Thye, 229–253. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Archon Fung. 2004. “Radical Democracy.” Swiss Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 23–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. London, UK: The Athlone Press. (Translated by Brian Massumi). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. What is Philosophy. London, UK: Verso. (Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchill). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Direct Action Conference (DAC) international organizers. 1995. Shared Path Shared Goal: A Handbook on Direct Democracy and the Consensus Decision Process. Budapest: ZHABA facilitators collective.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York, NY: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick. 1992. “Ethnographic Microanalysis of Interaction.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, ed. by M.D. LeCompte, W.I. Milroy, J Preissle, 201–225. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation.” Text 6 (3): 283–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1489–1522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Embedded Context.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (4): 323–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse and Society 18 (1): 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 461: 8–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Car Talk: Integrating Texts, Bodies, and Changing Landscapes.” Semiotica 1911: 1–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1999. “Participation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1–2): 173–176. (Republished in Key Terms in Language and Culture, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 172–175. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie, Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by M.-L. Sorjonen, and A. Perakyla, 16–41. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1972. “The Neglected Situation”. In Language and Social Context, ed. by P.P. Giglioli, 61–66. Baltimore, MA: Penguin. (reprinted from the American Anthropologist 66:133–136, 1964). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guardian UK “Occupy protests around the world: full list visualized” Data Blog. October 17, 2011. [URL].
Hicks, Darrin. 2002. “The Promise(s) of Deliberative Democracy”. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 51: 223–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1996. “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Michael Silverstein, and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Jennifer. 2008. “Building Publics, Shaping Public Opinion: Interanimating Registers in Malagasy Kabary Oratory and Political Cartooning.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 18 (2): 214–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, Carrie. 2011. “Battle Cry: Occupy’s Messaging Tactics Catch On.” NPR, December 06, 2011. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Richard. 2011. “We Are All Human Microphones Now.” The Nation, October 3, 2011. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los Angeles GA. 2012. “Definition of a Hard Block.” [URL].
Lorey, Isabel. 2011. “Non-representationist, Presentist Democracy.” Transversal 101. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. In press. “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Language Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by Ralph Ludwig, Peter Mühlhäusler, and Steve Pagel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nevit, Allison. 2011. “Witnessing #occupywallstreet: the Power…of the People…’s mic.” In Voices from the 99 Percent – An Oral History of the Occupy Wall Street Movement, ed. by Lenny Flank. St. Petersburg, FL: Red and Black Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Occupy Los Angeles.org. 2011. “The Dummy’s Guide to the General Assembly.” [URL].
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1971. “Political Culture, Political Structure and Political Change.” British Journal of Political Science 1 (3): 291–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for theOrganization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 71: 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ronald, and Suzanne B. K. Scollon. 2003. Discourses in Place: Language in the material world. London, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. 1992. The Fall of Public Man. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sitrin, M. 2006. Horizontalism: Voices of Popular Power in Argentina. Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitulnik, Debra. 1996. “The Social Circulation of Media Discourse and the Mediation of Communities.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 6 (2):161–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Writers for the 99%. 2012. Occupying Wall Street: The Inside Story of an Action that Changed America. New York: OR Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zittel, T., and D. Fuchs. 2006. Participatory Democracy and Political Participation: Can Participatory Engineering Bring Citizens Back In? Oxon, NY: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science. Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Szczygiel, Przemyslaw & Piotr Kowzan
2025. Wild Competences. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults DOI logo
Felicetti, Andrea & Markus Holdo
2024. Reflective Inclusion: Learning from Activists What Taking a Deliberative Stance Means. Political Studies 72:2 ► pp. 823 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Sungwoo & In Chull Jang
2022. A trajectory of a mediational means in protest: the hand placard in South Korea’s Candlelight Protests. Social Semiotics 32:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Felicetti, Andrea
2021. Learning from Democratic Practices: New Perspectives in Institutional Design. The Journal of Politics 83:4 ► pp. 1589 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Hong & Brian Hok-Shing Chan
2021. Protest graffiti, social movements and changing participation frameworks. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
McIlvenny, Paul
2017. Mobilising the micro-political voice. Journal of Language and Politics 16:1 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue