Cover not available

Article published In: Cognitive Perspectives on Political Discourse
Edited by Pascal Fischer and Christoph Schubert
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:2] 2014
► pp. 313–335

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies

Presidential rhetoric in the USA

 | University of Vechta |
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.06sch
Cognitive categorization is an indispensable instrument for organizing human experience. Owing to the obvious appeal of clear-cut categories in ideological discourse, polarization frequently serves as a strategy of political persuasion. The success of such rhetoric corroborates the allure of dichotomies, although they blatantly contradict the fuzzy nature of cognitive categories. Since prototypicality yields a great cognitive effect but demands only little processing effort, prototypes are particularly convenient in political speeches, where speakers must often get their message across to a wide and heterogeneous audience in a limited time span. Along these lines, the analysis of 32 presidential speeches from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush brings to light how the prototypical enemy or national hero is established. This paper aims to show that political rhetoric does not merely reflect existing categorizations but also has the power to shape and perpetuate them in the minds of the target audience.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Categorization and prototypicality
  • 3.Persuasion and legitimisation
  • 4.Persuasion through categories and prototypes
    • 4.1Categories: boundaries, levels, and diachronic co-categorization
    • 4.2Prototypes: Enemies, heroes, and presidents
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (eds). 1990. Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schäffner. 2002. “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Edward W. Said. 1999. Acts of Aggression: Policing “Rogue” States. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cockcroft, Robert, and Susan Cockcroft. 2005. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, John, and Ross Glover. 2002. “Introduction.” In Collateral Language: A User’s Guide to America’s New War, ed. by John Collins, and Ross Glover, 1–13. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed., ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 62–86. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörner, Andreas. 1993. “Zur rhetorischen Konstruktion politisch-kultureller Identitäten: Selbst- und Fremdbilder in zwei Reden Ronald Reagans.” In Die Rhetorik amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt, ed. by Paul Goetsch, and Gerd Hurm, 285–305. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fergusson, Rosalind (ed.). 1992. Penguin Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2007. “Where does Prototypicality Come from?” In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken, 168–185. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goetsch, Paul. 1993. “Kriegsbotschaften amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt.” In Die Rhetorik amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt, ed. by Paul Goetsch, and Gerd Hurm, 73–96. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. “Persuasion by Inference: Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics, ed. by Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 121–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” Viet Nam Generation Journal & Newsletter 3 (3) 〈[URL]〉 (Last Accessed February 20, 2011).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazar, Annita, and Michelle M. Lazar. 2008. “Discourse of Global Governance: American Hegemony in the Post-Cold War Era.” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 228–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llorente, Marina A. 2002. “Civilization versus Barbarism.” In Collateral Language: A User’s Guide to America’s New War, ed. by John Collins, and Ross Glover, 39–51. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulholland, Joan. 1994. Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, John M. 2003. “‘Our Mission and Our Moment’: George W. Bush and September 11th.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6 (4): 607–632. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reardon, Kathleen Kelley. 1991. Persuasion in Practice. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2008. “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 243–269. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 2000. “Categorization.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: 1998. Installment, ed. by Jef Verschueren et al., 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schubert, Christoph. 2010. “Narrative Sequences in Political Discourse: Forms and Functions in Speeches and Hypertext Frameworks.” In Narrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, 143–162. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Craig Allen, and Kathy B. Smith (eds). 1994. The White House Speaks: Presidential Leadership as Persuasion. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication & Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stüwe, Klaus, and Birgit Stüwe (eds). 2005. American Political Speeches. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey K. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volmert, Johannes. 1993. “Die Kriegsbotschaft als Justification Speech: Argumentation und Benennungsstrategien in Bushs Fernsehrede vom 16.1.1991.” In Die Rhetorik amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt, ed. by Paul Goetsch, and Gerd Hurm, 329–352. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldman, Michael (ed.). 2003. My Fellow Americans: The Most Important Speeches of America’s Presidents: From George Washington to George W. Bush. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc. [incl. Audio-CDs].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wawra, Daniela. 2008. “‘America at its Best’: The Discursive Construction of American Identity in the Inaugural Addresses of US-Presidents since 1789.” In Anglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings, ed. by Klaus Stierstorfer, 455–466. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1977. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “The Contribution of Critical Linguistics to the Analysis of Discriminatory Prejudices and Stereotypes in the Language of Politics.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 291–315. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Gayoso, Albina
2023. Introduction. In Understanding Political Public Relations Techniques, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Demir, Mehmet Özer, Biagio Simonetti, Murat Alper Başaran & Sezgin Irmak
2021. Voter Classification Based on Susceptibility to Persuasive Strategies: A Machine Learning Approach. Social Indicators Research 155:1 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Wenhui
2020. News Discourse and Cognitive Studies. In A Cross-Cultural Study of Commercial Media Discourses, ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 893 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Christoph
2019. ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 438 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Christoph
2021. Multimodal cohesion in persuasive discourse: A case study of televised campaign advertisements in the 2020 US presidential election. Discourse, Context & Media 43 ► pp. 100537 ff. DOI logo
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2018. Euphemism as a discursive strategy in US local and state politics. Journal of Language and Politics 17:6 ► pp. 789 ff. DOI logo
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
2018. Introduction to Discourse Studies, DOI logo
Hampl, Marek
2017. ‘BENEFICIARY’ AS A MEANS FOR A DICHOTOMOUS REPRESENTATION IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue