Article published In: Cognitive Perspectives on Political Discourse
Edited by Pascal Fischer and Christoph Schubert
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:2] 2014
► pp. 218–233
Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors
Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies
Published online: 29 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
The metaphorical categorization of social and political adversaries as “parasites” has an infamous history in public discourse: For two centuries it has been routinely used for the purpose of racial and socio-political stigmatization. In cognitive accounts, the parasite-metaphor has usually been treated as an example of semantic transfer from the biological to the social domain. Historically, however, the scientific uses cannot be deemed original or primary, as their emergence in the 17th and 18th centuries was preceded by a much older tradition of religious and social meanings. The paper charts the main traditions of diachronic variation in the discourse history of the parasite-metaphor anddiscusses the implications of its findings regarding the assumption of “uni-directionality” of metaphorization processes, which has been a central tenet of cognitive analyses. In conclusion, we ask whether metaphors in political discourse might fruitfully be viewed as a “parasitic” form of communication.
Keywords: Anti-Semitism, Chain of Being, Discourse-historical approach, metaphor, meme, metonymy, parasite, racism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: What it means to call somebody a “parasite”
- 2.Cognitive accounts of “racial parasites”
- 3.From society to biology and back: parasite-metaphors in history
- 4.Conclusions
- Notes
References
References (86)
Alexander, Brian. 2009. “Amid Swine Flu Outbreak, Racism Goes Viral.” mnsbc.com 1 May 2009. [URL]
Baranov, Anatolij, and Jörg Zinken. 2003. “Die metaphorische Struktur des öffentlichen Diskurses in Russland und Deutschland: Perestroika- und Wende-Periode.” In Metapher, Bild und Figur, ed. by Bernhard Symanzik, Gerhard Birkfellner, and Alfred Sproede, 93–121. Hamburg: Verlag Kovac.
Bärtsch, Christine. 2004. Metaphernkonzepte in Pressetexten. Das Verhältnis der Schweiz zu Europa und zur Europäischen Union. Diss. phil.Zürich.
Bednarek, Monika. 2005. “Construing the World: Conceptual Metaphors and Event-Construal in News Stories.” metaphorik.de 91: 9–32.
Bey, Osman (Major). 1875. Die Eroberung der Welt durch die Juden. Versuch nach Geschichte und Gegenwart. Wiesbaden: Rudolf Bechtold & Comp.
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: The Case of Mein Kampf.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 15–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Charles. 61901 [11859]. On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.
Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. New edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, Richards. 2004. “Viruses of the Mind.” In A Devil’s Chaplain. Selected Essays, ed. by Latha Menon, 151–172. London: Phoenix.
de Baecque, Antoine. 1997. The Body Politic. Corporeal Metaphor in Revolutionary France 1770–1800. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Desmet, Pierre, Johan E. Rooryck, and Pierre Swiggers. 1990. “What Are Words Worth? Language and Ideology in French Dictionaries of the Revolutionary Period.” In Ideologies of Language, ed. by John E. Joseph, and Talbot J. Taylor, 162–188. London: Routledge.
. 2000. “Ideologies, Racism, Discourse. Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues.” In Comparative Perspectives on Racism, ed. by Jessika ter Wal, and Maykel Verkuyten, 91–116. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Dirven, René, Roslyn M. Frank, and Cornelia Ilie (eds). 2001. Language and Ideology. Volume II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Drulàk, Petr. 2004. “Metaphors Europe Lives by: Language and Institutional Change of the European Union.” EUI Working Papers, SPS No. 2004/15, Florence: European University Institute.
Eitz, Thorsten, and Georg Stötzel. 2007. Wörterbuch der „Vergangenheitsbewältigung“: Die NS-Vergangenheit im öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. Hildesheim: Olms.
Fabiszak, Malgorzata. 2007. A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and its Implications. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Friedländer, Saul. 1998. Nazi Germany and the Jews. Vol. 1: The Years of Persecution, 1933–1939. London: Phoenix.
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2008. “The ‘Metaphorical Annihilation’ of the Second Lebanon War (2006) from the Israeli Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 19 (5): 5–20.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gitelman, Zvi Y. 2001. A Century of Ambivalence: The Jews of Russia and the Soviet Union, 1881 to the Present. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, and Seana Coulson. 1999. “Blending and Metaphor.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, and Gerard Steen, 101–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grimm, Jacob, and Wilhelm Grimm. 1984. Deutsches Wörterbuch. 33 vols1. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert G. 1994. “The King and the Crowd: Divine Right and Popular Sovereignty in the French Revolution.” Contagion. Journal of Violence, Mimesis and Culture 31: 67–84
Hawkins, Bruce. 2001. “Ideology, Metaphor and Iconographic Reference.” In Language and Ideology. Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, ed. by René Dirven, Roslyn Frank, and Cornelia Ilie, 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1893. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit (1784–91). In Sämmtliche Werke. Vol. 141, ed. by B. Suphan, Berlin 1909.
Hodson, Jane. 2007. Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Paine and Godwin. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hunt, Lynn. 1984. Politics, Culture and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
. 1991. “The Many Bodies of Marie Antoinette: Political Pornography and the Problem of the Feminine in the French Revolution.” In Eroticism and the Body Politic, ed. by Lynn Hunt, 108–130. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Inda, Jonathan Xavier. 2000. “Foreign Bodies: Migrants, Parasites and the Pathological Nation.” Discourse 22 (3): 46–62.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jonson, Ben. 1966 [11606]. Volpone, or The Fox. In: Volpone and Other Plays. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 37–174.
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2005. “Racist Manipulation within Austrian, German, Dutch, French and Italian Right-Wing Populism.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 213–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 2006. “60 Jahre danach. Vermutungen über eine sich verändernde Rhetorik des Erinnerns in Deutschland.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 2 (02): 97–120.
Kornprobst, Markus, Vincent Pouliot, Nisha Shah, and Ruben Zaiotti (eds). 2008. Metaphors of Globalization. Mirrors, Magicians and Mutinies. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2009. “Metaphor, Culture and Discourse: the Pressure of Coherence.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, and Jörg Zinken, 11–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyitsch. 1963–9. “The State and Revolution.” In Collected Works. Vol. 251, 381–492. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Liddell, Henry George, and Robert Scott. 1869. A Greek-English Lexicon. 6th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lovejoy, Arthur Oncken. 1936. The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Marx, Karl. 1960. “Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte.“ In Karl Marx, and Friedrich Engels. Werke. Vol. 81, 149–158. Berlin (GDR): Dietz Verlag.
Messer, Michi, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2012. Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vienna: Springer.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. “The Heart of the European Body Politic. British and German Perspectives on Europe’s Central Organ.” Multilingual & Multicultural Development 25 (5 & 6): 437–452.
. 2007. “What Role Do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? - The Function of Antisemitic Imagery in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’.” Patterns of Prejudice 41 (1): 21–44.
. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust. The Concept of the Body Politic. London/New York: Routledge.
Petraškaite-Pabst, Sandra. 2010. “Metaphors in German and Lithuanian Discourse Concerning the Expansion of the European Union.” In Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse, ed. by Ljiljana Šarić, Andreas Musolff, Stefan Manz, and Ingrid Hudabiunigg, 33–50. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Pörksen, Bernhard. 2005. Die Konstruktion von Feindbildern. Zum Sprachgebrauch in neonazistischen Medien. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd revised edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
Schama, Simon. 1989. Citizens. A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Vintage Books/London: Penguin.
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. 2002. 5th ed., ed. by William R. Trumble, and Angus Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sieyès, Emmanuel. 1989. Qu’est-ce que le Tiers État? Précédé de L’Essai sur les Privilèges, ed. by Edme Champion. Paris: Quadrige/resses Universitaires de France.
Steiner, George. 1987. “Das lange Leben der Metaphorik. Ein Versuch über die ‚Shoah’. Aus dem Englischen von Jörg Trabitius.” Akzente 341: 194–212.
WalesOnline. 2010. South Wales man called Jews parasites. [URL] (Last accessed December 31, 2010).
Walzer, Michael (ed.). 1992. Regicide and Revolution: Speeches at the Trial of Louis XVI. Translated by Marian Rothstein. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd revised edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.
. 2011. “Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying the Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria.” In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, ed. by Willibald Steinmetz, 351–379. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Zbierska-Sawala, Anna. 2004. The Conceptualisation of the European Union in Polish Public Discourse. Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25 (5 & 6): 408–423.
Zimmer, Carl. 2001. Parasite Rex. Inside the Bizarre World of Nature’s Most Dangerous Creatures. New York: Free Press.
Zinken, Jörg. 2007. “Discourse Metaphors: The Link between Figurative Language and Habitual Analogies.” Cognitive Linguistics 18 (3): 443–464.
Cited by (31)
Cited by 31 other publications
Bao, Kai
Rintamäki, Jukka, Simon Parker & André Spicer
Wu, Yang
2025. China’s official use and translation of conflict metaphor over two decades. Metaphor and the Social World 15:1 ► pp. 135 ff.
Feifei, Fu & Rachel Thompson
Vazyanau, Andrei
Daniel, Rhianwen
Olsson, Pia
Tayebipour, Meysam
Thinane, Dr Jonas Sello
Koca-Helvacı, Zeynep Cihan
2022. ‘Coronavirus as a political weapon’. In Science Communication in Times of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 96], ► pp. 169 ff.
Lahti, Emmi
Mujagić, Mersina
Fabiszak, Małgorzata, Isabelle Buchstaller, Anna Weronika Brzezińska, Seraphim Alvanides, Frauke Griese & Carolin Schneider
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga
Baider, Fabienne H.
Hampl, Marek
Mujagić, Mersina & Sanja Berberović
Pawłowska, Katarzyna
Pawłowska, Katarzyna
Prażmo, Ewelina Maria
2019. “Leftie snowflakes” and other metaphtonymies in the British political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
Rafoss, Tore Witsø
Thibodeau, Paul H., James Fleming & Maya Lannen
2019. Variation in methods for studying political metaphor. In Variation in political metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 177 ff.
Kopytowska, Monika & Paul Chilton
Baider, Fabienne & Monika Kopytowska
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen
Kopytowska, Monika & Łukasz Grabowski
Prażmo, Ewelina
2017. Deliberately misleading or unintentionally ambiguous?. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 346 ff.
Burgers, Christian
Musolff, Andreas
2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
