Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 13:1 (2014) ► pp.171–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The ideational clinch of the Roman Catholic Church and the EU

The Europeanization of the Catholic clergy’s discourse?

 |  | Institute of International Relations, Prague |
 |  | Institute of International Relations, Prague |
Published online: 15 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.1.08kra
The article explores the so far largely ignored question of the political relations between the European Union and the Roman Catholic Church. It analyzes the deeper mutual ideational influences of the two entities, asking whether there has been a convergence of views about several basic political notions between the Church and the EU. The analysis centres on the Church’s approach to four fundamental notions related to the EU – (1) secularism, (2) the individual(ism), (3) free market, and (4) the state, stressing in particular the discursive strategies the Church employs to defend its own position. The conclusion focuses on the relation between the RCC’s “theopolitical” imagination and the EU’s political form and argues that the surprisingly strong support of the Church for the integration process is not only a result of the aggiornamento, but a peculiar example of the Church’s ongoing Europeanization. Methodologically, the paper builds on a discourse analysis of almost 160 documents released by the three key Church bodies which often comment on the EU: the Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community, the Council of European Bishops’ Conferences, and the Curia.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research design
    • 2.1Criteria for text selection and the key concepts
    • 2.2Methodology
  • 3.Secularism: Healthy secularism vs. hostile secularism
    • a.Definition of secularism
    • b.Predication
    • c.Argumentation
  • 4.Individualism: Human person vs. individual
    • a.Definition
    • b.Predication
    • c.Argumentation
  • 5.The free market vs. the common good
    • a.Definition
    • b.Predication
    • c.Argumentation
  • 6.The nation state: European unity vs. state-centrism
    • a.Definition
    • b.Predication
    • c.Argumentation
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Appendix
    • 1.Quoted primary documents of the research sample
    • 2.Other documents
  • References
References (27)
References
Arnold, John. 2005. “CEC and EECCS: The Process of Integration.” In A Theology for Europe. The Churches and the European Institutions, ed. by James Barnett, 107–118. Bern: Peter Lang AG, European Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Audi, Robert, and Nicholas Wolterstorff. 1996. Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate. Maryland and London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbulescu, Iordan G., and Gabriel Andreescu. 2009. “References to God and the Christian Tradition in the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: An Examination of the Background.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 8 (24): 207–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, Philip M. 2003. “British Christians and European Integration.” The Historian 781: 33–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crnic, Aleš. 2007. “New Religions in ‘New Europe’.” Journal of Church and State 49 (3): 517–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faltin, Lucia. 2007. “Introduction: The Religious Roots of Contemporary European Identity.” In The Religious Roots of Contemporary European Identity, ed. by Lucia Faltin, and Melanie J. Wright, 1–13. London and New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2001. “Religion as an Overlooked Element of International Relations.” International Studies Review 3 (3): 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, Paul. 2005. “The Holy See and Europe: An Enduring Commitment.” In A Theology for Europe. The Churches and the European Institutions, ed. by James Barnett, 93–106. Bern: Peter Lang AG, European Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, James P. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatzopoulos, Pavlos, and Fabio Petito. 2003. Religion in International Relations. The Return from Exile. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollerich, Michael. 2004. “Carl Schmitt.” In The Blackwell Companion to Political Theology, ed. by Peter Scott, and William T. Cavanaugh, 107–122. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Keith. 2005. “The Churches and Europe: Reacting to the European Institutions.” In A Theology for Europe. The Churches and the European Institutions, ed. by James Barnett, 73–92. Bern: Peter Lang AG, European Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerry, Paul. 2007. “The Quarrel Over the Religious Roots of European Identity in the European Constitution and the Nature of Historical Explanation: A Catholic Coign of Vantage.” In The Religious Roots of Contemporary European Identity, ed. by Lucia Faltin, and Melanie J. Wright, 166–178. London and New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knippenberg, Hans. 2006. “The Political Geography of Religion: Historical State-Church Relations in Europe and Recent Challenges.” GeoJournal 67 (4): 253–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratochvíl, Petr. 2009a. “The Religious Turn in International Relations: A Brief Assessment.” Perspectives 2/20091: 5–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “The Religion-Politics Nexus in East-Central Europe: Church in the Public Sphere of Post-Secular Societies.” Perspectives 2/20091: 119–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus H. 2004. Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed). CA, London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manheim, Jarol B., and Richard C. Rich. 1991. Empirical Political Analysis. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelsen, Brent F., James L. Guth, and Cleveland R. Fraser. 2001. “Does Religion Matter?: Christianity and Public Support for the European Union.” European Union Politics 2 (2): 191–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European Integration. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruggie, John. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47 (1): 139–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Philip, and François Foret. 2006. “Political Roof and Sacred Canopy?: Religion and the EU Constitution.” European Journal of Social Theory 9 (1): 59–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1922. Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität [Political Theology. Four Chapters on Doctrine of the Sovereignty]. Munich and Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humboldt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venneri, Giulio, and Paolo O. Ferrara. 2009. “Alcide De Gasperi and Antonio Messineo: a Spiritual Idea of Politics and a Pragmatic Idea of Religion?.” In Religion, Politics and Law in the European Union, ed. by Lucian N. Leustean, and John T. S. Madeley, 109–123. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willaime, Jean-Paul. 2009. “European Integration, Laïcité and Religion.” In Religion, Politics and Law in the European Union, ed. by Lucian N. Leustean, and John T. S. Madeley, 17–29. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer (eds). 2009. Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed). London, CA, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue