Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:4 (2013) ► pp.626–651

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Writing the history of the victors?

Discourse, social change and (radical) democracy

 | Georg Eckert Institute, Braunschweig
 | Ghent University
Published online: 31 January 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.4.07mac
Recently, interest in radical democracy and communism has increased dramatically among cultural theorists. This paper draws attention to two other fields in which a similar shift is visible. First, popular scholarly writing on communism, anarchism and socialism. Second, curricular materials for history teaching. Drawing on ethnographic field work at an educational publishing house in Germany, the paper analyses the production of a history textbook. Analysis identifies ambiguities and tensions in the way forms of political organisation and practice are discussed and changes made. One change involves the subtle revalorization of the 1918 revolution and the early days of the Weimar Republic, which could be considered an attempt at shaping a ‘radical democracy’. The study contributes to emerging work on discourse and social change which aims to not only critique dominant discourse but also explore fissures in hegemonic formations. By analysing the production of these history materials, we explore competing discursive possibilities – ways of understanding and enacting democracy – circulating today.
References (60)
References
Adie, Lenore. 2008. “The Hegemonic Positioning of ‘Smart State’ Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 231: 251–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930801923831. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. (2010). The Communist Hypothesis. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, Jason. (2011). Marx Reloaded. Germany: arte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Archie. (2009). The Rise and Fall of Communism. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Duncan. 2009. “Move over Jacko, Idea of Communism is Hottest Ticket in Town this Weekend.” The Guardian. 12 March, http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/12/philosophy.
Carpentier, Nico, and Bart Cammaerts. 2006. “Hegemony, Democracy, Agonism and Journalism.” Journalism Studies 7 (6): 964–975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700600980728. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald A. (2009). Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Stephen F. (1985). Rethinking the Soviet Experience: Politics and History since 1917. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Beaulieu, Susan Chales, and Jean-Baptiste Farkas. (2010). Alien, Marx & Co. Germany: Arte, 111 mins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, and Slavoj Žižek (eds). (2010). The Idea of Communism. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. (2011). Why Marx was Right. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel, Gerhard, Gaby Huch, and Ingo Materna (eds). (2002). Groß-Berliner Arbeiter- und Soldatenräte in der Revolution 1918/19. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eyben, Rosalind, and Rebecca Napier-Moore. 2009. “Choosing Words with Care? Shifting Meanings of Women’s Empowerment in International Development.” Third World Quarterly 30 (2): 285–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436590802681066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faber, Brenton. 2003. “Creating Rhetorical Stability in Corporate University Discourse.” Written Communication 20 (4): 391–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088303259869. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Marges Linguistiques 91: 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. (1994). The Russian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1996. “Equality, Difference, and Radical Democracy: The United States Feminist Debates Revisited.” In Radical Democracy: Identity, Citizenship and the State, ed. by David Trend, 197–208. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garner, Dwight. 2009. “Communism’s Path: A Once-Vigorous Idea that has Lost its Muscle.” The New York Times. 8 December, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/books/09book.html.
Gebhard, Meg. 2004. “Fast Capitalism, School Reform, and Second Language Literacy Practices.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (2): 245–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00228.x. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Phil. 2002. “Hypercapitalism: Language, New Media and Social Perceptions of Value.” Discourse & Society 13 (2): 227–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, John. 2009. “The Red Flag: Communism and the Making of the Modern World By David Priestland.” New Statesman. 27 August, http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2009/08/communism-communist-soviet.
Keenan, Bernard. 2009. “Communism: A Viable Alternative?” The Guardian. 16 March, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/16/communism-philosophy-communist-party.
Kolb, Eberhard (ed.). (1972). Vom Kaiserreich zur Weimarer Republik. Köln: Kiepenhauer & Witsch.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Ideology and Post-Marxism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 103–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687882. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. (2008). Die Bresche: Essays zum Mai 68. Vienna: Turia + Kant.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas, and Tom Van Hout. 2011. “Ethnographic Discourse Analysis and Social Science [51 paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101183 .
Marshall, Peter. (2010). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massey, Alexander. 1998. “The Way We do Things Around Here: The Culture of Ethnography.” Paper presented at the Ethnography and Education Conference , Oxford University Department of Educational Studies (OUDES).
Moore, Michael. 2009. Capitalism: A Love Story. USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Richard. 2002. 1918: Räte in Deutschland. http://www.sozialismus.info/?sid=26.
Newman, Michael. (2005). Socialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804310.001.0001. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NewsTalk&Text Research Group. 2011. “Towards a Linguistics of News Production.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (7): 1843–1852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.022. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, John. (2011). The “S” Word: A Short History of an American Tradition…Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta. (2007). Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Priestland, David. (2009). The Red Flag: Communism and the Making of the Modern World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Publishers Weekly. 2010. “Demanding the Impossible.” Publishers Weekly. April 2010, http://www.pmpress.org/content/article.php?story=PeterMarshall#reviews.
Rampton, Ben. 2007. “Linguistic Ethnography and the Study of Identities.” Working papers on Urban Language and Literacy . http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/04/20/06/RamptonrevisedLingethnidentitiesWP43.pdf.
Rancière, Jacques. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Clemencia. (2001). Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizen’s Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rurup, Reinhard, and Peter Brandt. (1980). Arbeiter-, Soldaten- und Volksrate in Baden 1918/19 (Quellen). Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Service, Robert. (2007). Comrades! Communism: A World History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Greg Urban (eds). (1996). Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Oxford: Altamira Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Praet, Ellen. 2010. “The Dual Voice of Domination: Ritual and Power in a British Embassy.” Text & Talk 30 (2): 213–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.011. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Kathleen. 1982. “Ethnography as a Methodology and its Application to the Study of Schooling: A Review.” In Doing Ethnography of Schooling, ed. by George Spindler, 456–488. New York: CBS Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, Paul, and Mats Trondman. 2000. “Manifesto for Ethnography.” Ethnography 1 (1): 5–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14661380022230679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodcock, George. (1986). Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movement. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolcott, Harry F. (2008). Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Plymouth: AltaMira.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. (2000). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). First as Tragedy, Then as Farce. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Chen, Wenge, Tom Bartlett & Huiling Peng
2021. Drilling for fissures and exploiting common ground in the discourse of oil production. Pragmatics and Society 12:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Wenge, Tom Bartlett & Huiling Peng
2021. The erasure of nature in the discourse of oil production. Pragmatics and Society 12:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020. Critiques of CDA/CDS and Responses. In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2016. Fissures in the discourse-scape: Critique, rationality and validity in post-foundational approaches to CDS. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. VI Anhang. In Diskurse und Praktiken der Schulbuchproduktion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und England am Beispiel von Afrikawissen, ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue