Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:3 (2013) ► pp.400–423

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Event-construal in press reports of violence in two recent political protests

A cognitive linguistic approach to CDA

 | Lancaster University
Published online: 27 September 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.05har
In this paper I extend the scope of the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) by incorporating Langacker’s model of Cognitive Grammar in a critical analysis of press reports of violence in two political protests. In doing so, I address issues recently raised against CDA concerning cognitive equivalence. The paper presents an analysis of the alternative conceptualisations of violence invoked in online reports from The Telegraph vs. The Guardian of two recent political protests. Systematic differences in construal are found across several parameters of conceptualisation, including schematisation and various ‘focal adjustments’, which, it is suggested, represent potential sites of ideological reproduction.
References (61)
References
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Aeekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2005. “Construing the World: Conceptual Metaphors and Event-Construal in News Stories.” Metaphorik de 91: 6–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2008. “The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Case of Nominalisation.” Discourse & Society 191: 783–800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095894. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. (2006). Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005. Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (6): 563–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton, 19–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 21, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Yew-Jin. 1994. “‘Riots’ and Demonstrations in the Chinese Press: A Case Study of Language and Ideology.” Discourse & Society 5 (4): 463–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004003. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. “Frame semantics”. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Linguistics Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “On Critical Linguistics”. In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 3–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hackett, Robert, and Yuezhi Zhou. 1994. “Challenging a Master Narrative: Peace Protest and Opinion/Editorial Discourse in the US Press during the Gulf War.” Discourse & Society 5 (4): 509–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004005. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1973. “A world at one with itself.” In The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media, ed. by Stanley Cohen, and Jock Young, 147–156. London: Constable.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. “Moving beyond Metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA: Construal Operations in Immigration Discourse.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 171–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Force-Interactive Patterns in Immigration Discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA.” Discourse & Society 22 (3): 269–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011c. “Legitimising Assertions and the Logico-Rhetorical Module: Evidence and Epistemic Vigilance in Media Discourse on Immigration.” Discourse Studies 13 (6): 751–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Paul Davidson. 2008. “Social Exclusion as Conceptual and Grammatical Metaphor: A Cross-Genre Study of British Policy Making.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 307–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088963. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Robert Hodge. (1993). Language as Ideology. 2nd edn. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphors We Lisve By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Junghi, and Robert Craig. 1992. “News as an Ideological Framework: Comparing US Newspapers’ Coverage of Labor Strikes in South Korea and Poland.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 341–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003003004Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macleod, Douglas, and James Hertog. 1992. “The Manufacture of ‘Public Opinion’ by Reporters: Informal Cues for Publication Perceptions of Protest Groups.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 259–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003003001Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean. (2004). The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana. 2011. “Effective vs. Epistemic Stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 193–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. (1986). An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murdock, Graham. 1973. “Political Deviance: The Press Presentation of a Militant Mass Demonstration.” In The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media, ed. by Stanley Cohen, and Jock Young, 206–225. London: Constable.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. (2004). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 543–565. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, Günter, and René Dirven. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. (2002). Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1997. “Whorf ’s Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).” In Evolving Models of Language, ed. by Ann Ryan, and Alison Wray, 100–116. Clevedon: British Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 121: 49–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. (1991). Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trew, Tony. 1979. “Theory and Ideology at Work.” In Language and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler, Robert Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 94–116. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1991). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Context Models in Discourse Processing”. In The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading, ed. by Herre van Oostendorp, and Susan Goldman, 123–148. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimising Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 10b (1): 83–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 1995. “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400301Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What is CDA about: A Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–13. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d3Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Mediation between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 179–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
G20 protests: riot police clash with demonstrators. The Guardian, 1 April 2009. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/01/g20-summit-protests
G20 protests: Rioters loot RBS as demonstrations turn violent. The Telegraph, 1 April 2009. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/g20-summit/5089870/G20-protests-Rioters-loot-RBS-as-demonstrations-turn-violent.html
Student protest over fees turns violent. The Guardian, 10 November 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/nov/10/student-protest-fees-violent
Student tuition fee protest turns violent as Tory headquarters evacuated. The Telegraph, 10 November 2010. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/8123194/Student-tuition-fee-protest-turns-violent-as-Tory-headquarters-evacuated.html
Cited by (37)

Cited by 37 other publications

Andersson, Marta
2025. The language of threat. Pragmatics and Society 16:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Christian R.
2025. Persuasive Politics. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Jovanović, Vladimir Ž., Marta Veličković & Biljana Mišić Ilić
2025. Image-schematic complexes in political discourse conceptualizations. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 12:2 ► pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
Osisanwo, Ayo & Ruth Karachi Benson Oji
2025. Us and them. Pragmatics and Society DOI logo
Porto, M. Dolores & Isabel Alonso Belmonte
2025. Constructing threat through proximization in digital news: A multimodal analysis. Discourse & Society 36:6 ► pp. 926 ff. DOI logo
Alduais, Ahmed, Ammar Al-Khawlani, Shrouq Almaghlouth & Hind Alfadda
2022. Cognitive Linguistics: Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domains. Journal of Intelligence 10:4 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Bray, Carly
2022. Cooperation and demotion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of Aboriginal people(s) in Australian print news. Discourse & Communication 16:5 ► pp. 504 ff. DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
2022. Cognitive Grammar. In The Language of Siegfried Sassoon [Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Meikle, Paulette A. & Lekeitha R. Morris
2022. University Social Responsibility: Challenging Systemic Racism in the Aftermath of George Floyd’s Murder. Administrative Sciences 12:1 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Betty, RaMonda Horton, Benjamin Munson, Brandi L. Newkirk-Turner, Valerie E. Johnson, Reem Khamis-Dakwar, Maria L. Muñoz & Yvette D. Hyter
2022. Making Race Visible in the Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences: A Critical Discourse Analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 31:2 ► pp. 578 ff. DOI logo
Daugulis, Mārtiņš & Kārlis Bukovskis
2021. Contradicting Narratives on the Spirit of the Laws: Cognitive Discourse Analysis on Narratives in China and Central and Eastern Europe. SOCRATES. Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls / SOCRATES. Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of Law 2:20 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Meluzzi, Chiara, Erica Pinelli, Elena Valvason & Chiara Zanchi
2021. Responsibility attribution in gender-based domestic violence: A study bridging corpus-assisted discourse analysis and readers' perception. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, DOI logo
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Osisanwo, Ayo & Osas Iyoha
2020. ‘We are not terrorist, we are freedom fighters’: Discourse representation of the pro-Biafra protest in selected Nigerian newspapers. Discourse & Society 31:6 ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Cap, Piotr
2019. Discourse studies: Between social constructionism and linguistics. A critical overview. Topics in Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cap, Piotr
2021. On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research. Pragmatics and Society 12:2 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Díaz-Peralta, Marina
2018. Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:2 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
DÍAZ-PERALTA, MARINA
2021. Gramática cognitiva y representación del mundo femenino en el discurso político español de finales del siglo XIX. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 98:6 ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Koc-Michalska, Karolina & Odile Vallée
2017. Les élections présidentielles : un événement politique en ligne. Sciences de la société :102 ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Yanying
2017. Cultural Conceptualisations of Collective Self-representation Among Chinese Immigrants. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2017. Conceptualising force in the context of the Arab Revolutions: A comparative analysis of international mass media reports and Twitter posts. Discourse & Communication 11:2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019. Epistemic stancetaking and speaker objectification in a spatio-cognitive discourse world. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3 ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Wong, May L.-Y.
2017. Analysing aggression of social actors in political protests: combining corpus and cognitive approaches to discourse analysis. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research 9:3 ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Budd, Kate
2016. Analysing political speeches: rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Critical Discourse Studies 13:1 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Koca-Helvacı, Zeynep Cihan
2016. Anarchy or Utopia? Turkish Media Representation of the Gezi Park Protests. In Protest, Social Movements and Global Democracy Since 2011: New Perspectives [Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 39], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Ryazanova-Clarke, Lara
2016. Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Public Discourses. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE. Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2016. Event-Frames Affect Blame Assignment and Perception of Aggression in Discourse on Political Protests: An Experimental Case Study in Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw017 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2016. The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2020. Cognitive Linguistic and Experimental Methods in Critical Discourse Studies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2023. Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA. Discourse Studies 25:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Costelloe, Laura
2014. Discourses of sameness: Expressions of nationalism in newspaper discourse on French urban violence in 2005. Discourse & Society 25:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Jaakola, Minna, Maija Töyry, Merja Helle & Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö
2014. Construing the reader: A multidisciplinary approach to journalistic texts. Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 640 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2015. Crime and Corpus [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 20], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Persuasion and (New) Contexts of Use. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue