Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:3 (2013) ► pp.315–334
Managing ideological differences in joint political press conferences
A study of the strategic use of the personal pronoun ‘we’
Published online: 27 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.01mob
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.01mob
This study focuses on Swedish political press conferences and explores the discursive efforts of politicians to express unity despite diverging ideological views. It concerns the use of the first person pronoun ‘we’ (Swedish. we) and is influenced by both dialogue theory and linguistic theories, which highlight the meaning of pronouns in context. The data consist of transcribed web broadcasts of press conferences with the leaders of the four political parties that form the Swedish Government since 2006. Our analysis reveals that a clear-cut use of the personal pronoun ‘we’ can serve the same political purposes as a more ambiguous use, i.e. to show unity while there are differences. The four party leaders are involved in a communicative project of ‘doing unity’ to demonstrate that they are a very capable government.
References (30)
Banning, Stephen A., and Susan Billingsley. 2007. “Journalist Aggressiveness in Joint Versus Solo Presidential Press Conferences.” Mass Communication & Society 10 (4), 461–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205430701580672
Bazzanella, Carla, 2002. “The Significance of Context in Comprehension: The ‘We Case’.” Foundations of Science 7 (3): 239–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019657025835
Benveniste, Émile. 1995. Människan i språket. Émile Benveniste; texter i urval av John Sweden-mark. Stockholm: B. Östlings bokförl. Symposion.
Bhatia, Aditi. 2006. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences.” Discourse & Society 17 (2): 173–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058057
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2006. “‘Who Are We and Who Are You?’ The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text & Talk 26 (1): 3–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002
Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schäffner. 1997. “Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 21, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 206–230. London: SAGE publications.
Chilton, Paul A., & Christina Schäffner. (2002). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Clayman, Steven E. 2006. “Arenas of Interaction in the New Media Era.” In News from the Interview Society, ed. by Mats Ekström, Åsa Kroon, and Mats Nylund, 239–264. Göteborg: Nordicom.
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie L. McDonald. 2006. “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 561–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x
. 2007. “When Does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 72 (1): 23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102
Clayman, Steven E., & John Heritage. (2002). The News Interview. Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623
Cramer, Jennifer. 2010. “‘Do We Really Want to be Like Them?’: Indexing Europeaness through Pronominal Use.” Discourse & Society 21 (6): 619–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926510381217
de Fina, Anna. 1995. “Pronominal Choice, Identity, and Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Text 15 (3): 379–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379
Ekström, Mats, Åsa Kroon, and Mats Nylund. (2006). News from the Interview Society. Göteborg: Nordicom.
Ekström, Mats. 2009. “Power and Affiliation in Presidential Press Conferences: A Study on Interruptions, Jokes and Laughter.” Journal of Language and Politics 8 (3): 386–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.03eks
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull. 2008. “‘Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence’. The Strategic Use of Pronouns in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 271–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet
Ínigo-Mora, Isabel. 2004. “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.05ini
Jacobs, Geert. 2010. “Press Conferences on the Internet: Technology, Mediation and Access in the News.” Journal of Pragmatics. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma. 2010.09.019.
Lanham, Richard A. (1991). A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Linell, Per. (1998). Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. (2009). Television Discourse. Analyzing Language in the Media. Palgrave Hampshire: Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Montgomery, Martin. 2008. “The Discourse of the Broadcast News Interview.” Journalism Studies 9 (2): 260–277.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848303
Mühlhäusler, Peter, & Rom Harré. (1990). Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pennycook, Alistair. 1994. “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal Volume 48 (2): 173–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.2.173
Petersoo, Pille. 2007. “What Does ‘We’ Mean? National Deixis in the Media.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3): 419–436.
Phillips, Louise. 1996. “Rhetoric and the Spread of the Discourse of Thatcherism.” Discourse and Society 7 (2): 209–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007002004
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Drori, Israel, Kerstin Neumann, Eero Vaara, Kees Boersma, Yiannis Kyratsis, Estefania Santacreu-Vasut & Roy Suddaby
Wan, Tsung‐Lun Alan
Turnbull, Margo
Amado, Adriana & Nicolás Rotelli
Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock
Watson, Cate & Aileen Ireland
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
