Review published In: Discourse and politics of migration in Italy: The production and reproduction of ethnic dominance and exclusion
Edited by Monica Colombo
[Journal of Language and Politics 12:2] 2013
► pp. 295–304
Book review
Review of Political Discourse Analysis: A Methods for Advanced Students by Isabela Fairclough and Norman Fairclough
Reviewed by
Published online: 2 August 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.2.07kie
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.2.07kie
References (26)
Amossy, Ruth. 2012. “Les enjeux du « déraisonnable »: rhétorique de la persuasion et rhétorique du dissensus.” In Chaïm Perelman (1912–2012). De la Nouvelle Rhétorique à la Logique Juridique, ed. by Benoît Frydman, and Michel Meyer, 17–37. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Garssen, Bart, and Manfred Kienpointner. 2011. “Figurative Analogy in Political Argumentation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck-Henkemans, 39–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1993. “The Empirical Relevance of Ch. Perelman’ s New Rhetoric.” Argumentation 7 (4): 419–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00711059
. 1998. “Inventio.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 41, ed. by Gert Ueding, 561–587, especially 564–567. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2003. “Perelman on Causal Arguments: The Argument of Waste.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 611–616. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Anna Orlandini. 2005. “La doxa de la justice à travers les langues et les époques.” Revue Internationale des droits de l’antiquité 521: 181–206.
Klein, Josef. 1995. “Asyl-diskurs. Konflikte und blockaden in politik, medien und alltagswelt.” In Sprache im Konflikt, ed. by Ruth Reiher, 15–71. Berlin: de Gruyter.
. 2003. “Politische Rede.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 61, ed. by Gert Ueding, 1465–1521. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 2006. “Die Idee des ,,universalen Publikums”. In Die Neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman, ed. by Josef Kopperschmidt, 227–279. München: Fink.
Perelman, Chaim. [1945] 1990. “De la justice.” In Éthique et droit, ed. by Chaim Perelman, 13–86. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. (1983). Traité de L’Argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 38ff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808630
Wodak, Ruth. (2011). The Discourse of Politics in Action. 2nd edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
O’Halloran, Kieran
2014. Counter-discourse corpora, ethical subjectivity and critique of argument. Journal of Language and Politics 13:4 ► pp. 781 ff.
[no author supplied]
2015. Counter-discourse corpora, ethical subjectivity and critique of argument: An alternative critical discourse analysis pedagogy. Journal of Language and Politics 13:4 ► pp. 781 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
