Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (26)
References
Amossy, Ruth. 2012. “Les enjeux du « déraisonnable »: rhétorique de la persuasion et rhétorique du dissensus.” In Chaïm Perelman (1912–2012). De la Nouvelle Rhétorique à la Logique Juridique, ed. by Benoît Frydman, and Michel Meyer, 17–37. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristoteles. 2002. Rhetorik. Transl. and comm. by Christoph Rapp. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garssen, Bart, and Manfred Kienpointner. 2011. “Figurative Analogy in Political Argumentation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck-Henkemans, 39–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 11. Bd. Frankfurt/M., 47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. (1992). Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Empirical Relevance of Ch. Perelman’ s New Rhetoric.” Argumentation 7 (4): 419–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00711059Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Inventio.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 41, ed. by Gert Ueding, 561–587, especially 564–567. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Perelman on Causal Arguments: The Argument of Waste.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 611–616. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Anna Orlandini. 2005. “La doxa de la justice à travers les langues et les époques.” Revue Internationale des droits de l’antiquité 521: 181–206.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Josef. 1995. “Asyl-diskurs. Konflikte und blockaden in politik, medien und alltagswelt.” In Sprache im Konflikt, ed. by Ruth Reiher, 15–71. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Politische Rede.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 61, ed. by Gert Ueding, 1465–1521. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 2006. “Die Idee des ,,universalen Publikums”. In Die Neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman, ed. by Josef Kopperschmidt, 227–279. München: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim. [1945] 1990. “De la justice.” In Éthique et droit, ed. by Chaim Perelman, 13–86. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. (1983). Traité de L’Argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 38ff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808630Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. (2003). Topos und Diskurs. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. (2011). The Discourse of Politics in Action. 2nd edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagar, Igor. 2011. “The Use and Misuse of Topoi: Critical Discourse Analysis and Discourse-historical Approach.” In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 2032–2046. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
O’Halloran, Kieran
2014. Counter-discourse corpora, ethical subjectivity and critique of argument. Journal of Language and Politics 13:4  pp. 781 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue