Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:1 (2013) ► pp.29–58
Evidencing international threat
Examining Iraq Survey Group’s post-invasion verification of Iraq’s WMD threat
Published online: 13 May 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.1.02cha
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.1.02cha
By studying the discourse utilized by the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) and its chief officers during 2003–2004, we show the methods by which U.S. government-appointed experts helped to affirm the existence of an Iraqi threat even in the absence of physical evidence for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) stockpiles or active weapons programs found in Iraq during U.S. ground search. Their data collection and interpretation work illuminates the principle that the claims and calculations of international threat can be primarily constructed by language and discourse processes rather than by direct/concrete material referents. It also points to the need for institutions and a lay audience to apply a higher evidentiary threshold to ascertain the existence of an international threat.
References (23)
Cap, Piotr. (2008). Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. 2nd edition. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Chang, Gordon C., and Hugh B. Mehan. 2006. “Discourse in a Religious Mode: The Bush Administration’s Discourse in the War on Terrorism and Its Challenges.” Pragmatics 16 (1): 1–23.
. 2008. “Why We Must Attack Iraq: Bush’s Reasoning Practices and Argumentation System.” Discourse and Society 19 (4): 449–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508089939.
Elbaradei, Mohamed. (2011). The Age of Deception: Nuclear Diplomacy in Treacherous Times. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2011. “Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse: The UK Government’s Response to the Economic Crisis in the 2008. Pre-Budget Report.” Discourse and Society 22 (3): 243–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395439.
Hart, Christopher (ed.). (2011). Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Hodges, Adam. (2011). The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Irvine, Judith. 1989. “When Talk Isn’t Cheap.” American Ethnologist 16 (2): 248–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040.
Lazar, Annita, and Michelle Lazar. 2004. “The Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-Casting’ the Double Face of Threat.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 223–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041018.
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland, and Jiri Nekvapil. 2004. “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing Violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 243–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382840.
Leudar, Ivan, and Jiri Nekvapil. 2011. “Practical Historians and Adversaries: 9/11 Revisited.” Discourse and Society 22 (1): 66–85.
Rawls, Anne Warfield. 2002. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism, ed. By Harold Garfinkel, 1–64. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield Publishers.
Schutz, Alfred, and Thomas Luckmann. (1973). The Structures of the Life-World: Volume 1. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen E. [1958]2003. The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005.
Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, et al.. (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499.
. (2009). Society in Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2011. “Discourse, Knowledge, Power, and Politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 27–64. Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Wilson, John, Ahmed Sahlane, and Ian Somerville. 2012. “Argumentation and Fallacy in Newspaper: Op/Ed Coverage of the Prelude to the Invasion of Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics 11 (1): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.01wil.
Wodak, Ruth. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Houndmills, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230233683
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.