Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:4 (2012) ► pp.562–582

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Terrorism rhetoric under the Bush Administration

Discourses and effects

 | University of Pisa and University of Bradford
Published online: 25 January 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.4.05bar
In this paper I examine some of the properties of the speeches by former U.S. President George W. Bush framing the issue of terrorism as the most pressing menace humanity is facing and some of the consequences of the selective appropriation of the discourse on terrorism initially instantiated by Bush. The theoretical framework for the analysis is a multidisciplinary Critical Discourse Analysis approach relating discursive and socio-political aspects of U.S. presidential discourses on terrorism in the Bush era. Parallel to an analysis of common characteristics of political discourse, such as ‘us’ versus ‘other’ representations, the device of over/less characterisation, hyperboles and repetitions, attention is also directed towards the socio-political effects deriving from the ways in which ‘terrorism’ and ‘terrorists’ have been represented by the presidential discourse on terrorism that condition the contemporary life of individuals and groups all around the world.
References (59)
References
Ahmed, Akbar. 2003. Islam under Siege. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, James. 2003. “American Hegemony after 11 September: Allies, Rivals and Contradictions.” Geopolitics 8 (3): 35—60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Sean K., and Stephen Sloan. 2003. Terrorism: Assassins to Zealots. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartolucci, Valentina. 2010. “Analysing Elite Discourse on Terrorism and its Implications: The Case of Morocco.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (1): 119—135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrick. 2002. “The Terrorist Threat, World Risk Society Revisited.” Theory Culture Society 19 (4): 39—55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney. 2004. “Bush and Blair: The betrayal.” The Guardian, 14 November.
Brunn, Stanley D. 2003. “11 September and its Aftermath: Introduction.” Geopolitics 8 (3): 1—15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buch-Andersen, Thomas. 2009. “Islam a political target in Norway.” BBC News Oslo, 20 April.
Burke, Jason. 2003. Al-Qaeda: Casting a Shadow of Terror. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, David G., Annabelle Lukin, and Christian M. I. M. Matt. 2004. “Grammar — The First Covert Operation of War.” Discourse and Society 15 (2—3): 267—290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2006. “Will the Global War on Terror be the New Cold War?” International Affairs 82 (6): 1101—1108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Gordon C., and Hugh B. Mehan. 2008. “Why e must Attack Iraq: Bush’s Reasoning Practices and Argumentation System.” Discourse and Society 19 (4): 453—482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coe, Kevin, David Domke, Erica S. Graham, Sue Lockett John, and Victor W. Richard. 2004. “No Shades of Gray: The Binary Discourse of George W. Bush and the Echoing Press.” Journal of Communication 541: 234—252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, John, and Ross Glover. 2002. Collateral Damage. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cox, Caroline, and John Marks. 2006. The West, Islam and Islamism: Is Ideological Islam Compatible with Liberal Democracy? London: Civitas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, Stuart. 2006. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalby, Simon. 2003. “Calling 911: Geopolitics, Security and America’s New War.” Geopolitics 8 (3): 61—86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 2003. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erjavec, Karmen, and Zala Volcic. 2006. “Mapping the Notion of ‘Terrorism’ in Serbian and Croatian Newspapers.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 30 (4): 298—318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Language, Reality and Power.” In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak, and Tony McEney, 512—522. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fekete, Liz. 2004. “Anti-Muslim Racism and the European Security State.” Race and Class 46 (1): 3—29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerges, Fawaz A. 2003. “Islam and Muslims in the Mind of America.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 5881: 73—89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Githens-Mazer, Jonathan, and Robert Lambert. 2010. Islamophobia and Anti-Muslim Hate Crime: A London Case-Study. European Muslim Research Centre. Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guittet, Emmanuel P. 2008. “Miscarriages of Justice and Exceptional Procedures in the ‘War against Terrorism’.” CEPS Special Report, September.
Gunn, Joshua. 2004. “The Rhetoric of Exorcism: George W. Bush and the Return of Political Demonology.” Western Journal of Communication 68 (1): 1—23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivie, Robert L. 2007. “Fighting Terror by Rite of Redemption and Reconciliation.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 10 (2): 221—248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, Amy. 2003. “Homeland Insecurities: Reflections on Language and Space.” Radical History Review 851 (Winter): 82—93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keen, David. 2006. Endless War? Hidden Functions of the ‘War on Terror’. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Jeremy. 2004. “Terror in the Sahara: The Implications of US Imperialism for North and West Africa.” Review of African Political Economy 1011: 475—496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Security and Insecurity in North Africa.” Revue of African Political Economy 33 (108): 269—296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellner, Douglass. 2002. “September 11, Social Theory and Democratic Politics.” Theory, Culture and Society 19 (4): 147—159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleinfeld, Margo. 2003. “Strategic Trooping in Sri Lanka: September Eleventh and the Consolidation of Political Position.” Geopolitics 8 (3): 105—126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2003. “China’s Dubious Role in the War on Terror.” Current History 102 (668): 432—460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2007. “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse.” Government and Opposition 42 (3): 394—426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chealsea Green.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, Julia. 2006. “Knocking on Europe’s Door: Islam in Italy.” The Brookings Institution 1—9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazar, Annita, and Michelle M. Lazar. 2004. “The Discourse of the New Order: ‘Outstanding’ The Double Face of Threat.” Discourse Society 15 (2—3): 223—242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maggio, J. 2007. “The Presidential Rhetoric of Terror: The (Re)Creation of Reality Immediately after 9/11.” Politics & Policy 35 (4): 810—835. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mamadouh, Virginie. 2003. “11 September and Popular Geopolitics: A Study of Websites Run for and by Dutch Moroccans.” Geopolitics 8 (3): 191—216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane. 2008. The Dark Side. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Erin. 2002. “Justice.” In Collateral Language: A Guide to America’s New War, ed. by John Collins and Ross Glover, 125—137. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, John. 2005. “Terrorists, Bandits, Spooks and Thieves: Russian Demonisation of the Chechens Prior to and Since 9/11.” Third World Quarterly 26 (1): 101—116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoddard, Eve W., and Grant H. Cornwell. 2002. “Unity.” In Collateral Language: A Guide to America’s New War, ed. by John Collins and Ross Glover, 175—190. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suskind, Ron. 2004. “Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush.” New York Times, 17 October.
Taylor, Stephanie. 2001. “Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytic Research.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, ed. by Wetherell Margaret, Taylor Stephanie, and Simeon J. Yates, 5—48. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. “Discourse, Ideology and Context.” Folia Linguistica 30 (1—2): 11—40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 65—91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Language and Politics.” In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak, and Tony McEney, 576—593. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, Paul. 2003. “The Rhetoric of Terrorism.” University of Leeds Papers. Accessed June 12, 2011. http://ics01.ds.leeds.ac.uk/papers/pmt/exhibits/1843/rhetoricTerr.pdf.
Woods, Joshua. 2007. “What We Talk When We Talk about Terrorism: Elite Press Coverage of Terrorism Risk from 1997 to 2005.” International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (3): 3—20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zarefsky, David. 2004. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definition.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 607—619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Yael. 1993. “The Death of Memory and the Memory of Death: Masada and the Holocaust as Historical Metaphors.” Paper presented at the 43rd Annual International Communication Association Conference, Washington, May 27—31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

Meader, Aimee Pavia & Matthew Wood Hayes
2025. ‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder. Journal of Language and Politics DOI logo
Noggle, Robert
2025. Manipulation, DOI logo
Zahora, Jakub
2025. The Terrorist Spectacle Revisited: Assemblages of Terror from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine to the Islamic State. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies DOI logo
Jacoby, Tim
2023. Islam, violence and the ‘four dogmas of Orientalism’. Race & Class 65:2 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Jacoby, Tim
2025. Islam and the Islamic State, DOI logo
Efeoğlu Özcan, Esranur
2022. Pull the weeds out or perish: Using pandemic metaphors to strengthen in-group solidarity in Turkish political discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 37:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Mironova, Vera & Sam Whitt
2022. Due Process and Accountability Under Transitional Justice: Evidence from Mosul, Iraq. Journal of Conflict Resolution 66:9 ► pp. 1650 ff. DOI logo
Mohnke, Margaux, Ursula Christmann, Yannick Roos & Chris Thomale
2022. Do metaphors make opinions?. Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
O'Brochta, William, Margit Tavits & Deniz Aksoy
2022. Western Political Rhetoric and Radicalization. British Journal of Political Science 52:1 ► pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Bartolucci, Valentina
2019. The Discourse on Terrorism of Donald Trump. In Reading Donald Trump, ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Bogain, Ariane
2019. Terrorism and the discursive construction of national identity in France. National Identities 21:3 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Fisher, Daren G., Laura Dugan & Erica Chenoweth
2019. Does US presidential rhetoric affect asymmetric political violence?. Critical Studies on Terrorism 12:1 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Thibodeau, Paul H., James Fleming & Maya Lannen
2019. Variation in methods for studying political metaphor. In Variation in political metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Bulgakova, Yulia, Veronika Shabanova & Anastasiya Eliseeva
2018. The Language of Leadership: Analyzing Public Speeches of Presidents (Literature Review). In Leadership for the Future Sustainable Development of Business and Education [Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, ], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Rowley, Loretta, Kevin Coe & Robert Layne
2018. Discovering and Recovering Arguments About Terror. In Recovering Argument, ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Bartolucci, Valentina & Joshua Skoczylis
2017. The Practice of Counterterrorism in the United Kingdom and its Sociopolitical Effects. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Counterterrorism Policy, ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen
2017. The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol 32:2 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Busch, Peter
2017. The Changing Media. In The Palgrave Handbook of Security, Risk and Intelligence, ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Hampl, Marek
2017. ‘BENEFICIARY’ AS A MEANS FOR A DICHOTOMOUS REPRESENTATION IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Bartolucci, Valentina & Giorgio Gallo
2015. Terrorism, System Thinking and Critical Discourse Analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 32:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Oleinik, Anton
2015. The language of power: a content analysis of presidential addresses in North America and the Former Soviet Union, 1993–2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2015:236 DOI logo
Rasmussen, Joel
2015. ‘Should each of us take over the role as watcher?’ Attitudes on Twitter towards the 2014 Norwegian terror alert. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10:2 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
McKinnon, Sara
2013. Text‐Based Approaches to Qualitative Research. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies, ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue