Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:4 (2012) ► pp.521–542
Death penalty discourses and the U.K. polity
A critical analysis
Published online: 25 January 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.4.03fla
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.4.03fla
In this paper I investigate the lack of public participation and consequent democratic deficit on the issue of the death penalty in the United Kingdom (henceforth the U.K.). I critically analyse the institutions and practices of the U.K. polity, and several parliamentary contributions to the death penalty discourses around abolition in 1964/65 and in 1994, the last debate to date on the issue in the U.K. parliament. Consequently, I argue that a range of causal tendencies operating in the polity are responsible for the lack of public participation and hence democratic deficit on this and other issues. And while I am sympathetic with present abolitionist penal policy, I nevertheless argue that these tendencies constitute dominatory practice.
Keywords: CDA, explanatory critique, the polity, death penalty
References (44)
Bhaskar, Roy. 1998a. The Possibility of Naturalism, A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
. 1998b. “Philosophy and Scientific Realism.” In Critical Realism, Essential Readings, ed. by M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, and A. Norrie, 16—47. London: Routledge.
Burke, Edmund. 1790. “Letter, February 26, 1790.” In The Correspondence of Edmund Burke, vol. 61, ed. by Alfred Cobban and Robert Arthur Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chouliaraki, Lillie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity, Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Collier, Andrew. 1994. Critical Realism, An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.
. 2001. “Political Equality in the Coming Century.” In Challenges to Democracy, Ideas, Involvement and Institutions, ed. by Keith Dowding, James Hughes, and Helen Margetts. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Political Studies Association.
Death Penalty Information Center. 2011. “Facts about the Death Penalty”. Accessed June 7, 2011. www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/Factsheet.pdf.
. 2001. “Marx and Freedom.” In The Great Philosophers, from Socrates to Turing, ed. by Ray Monk and Frederic Raphael, 265—306. London: Phoenix.
. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. London: Sage.
Flanagan, Eugene. 2008. Capital Punishment Discourses and the U.K. Public Sphere, A Critical Realist Analysis. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Bradford.
. 2010. “Death Penalty Discourses, The Printed Media, and the U.K. Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (3): 177—190.
Glynn, C.J., S. Herbst, G.J. O’Keefe, and R.Y. Shapiro. 1999. Public Opinion. Oxford: Westview Press.
Griffiths, R. 2010. “Cambridge Union Society: Votes to Abolish all Private Schools. 9/10/2010.” Accessed November 23, 2010. www.communist-party.org.uk.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, An Enquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. tr T. Burger and F. Lawrence. Oxford: Polity Press.
Marsh, David C., and Rhodes, R.A.W. 1992. “Policy Communities and Issue Networks, beyond Typology.” In Policy Networks in British Government, ed. by D. C. Marsh and R.A.W. Rhodes, 312. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mouzelis, Nicos P. 1990. Post-Marxist Alternatives, The Construction of Social Orders. London: Macmillan.
Pattie, C., R. Johnston, and M. Stuart. 1998. “Voting without Party?” In Conscience and Parliament, ed. by Philip Cowley. London: Frank Kass.
Sirriani, Carmen. 1982. Workers Control and Socialist Democracy. The Soviet Experience. London: New Left Books.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1994. “Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.” In Studies in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.