Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:3 (2012) ► pp.405–426
Discourses of counter-Islamic-threat mobilization in post 9/11 documentaries
Published online: 26 November 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.05myl
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.05myl
This article critically studies documentaries focusing on the “Islamic terrorist threat”, produced in the US and in Western Europe. The particular films relate to the discourses of the growing far right political movements in liberal democracies. The article analyzes the communicational tactics deployed by the filmmakers for counter-terrorist mobilization of “Westerners”. The films’ producers objectify the terrorist threat as exceptional and ontological, in order to reconfigure the identity of the “West”. The analysis focuses on representations of the West’s threatening Other through the reflexive use of critical discourse analysis and post structuralist, discourse theory. Counter-threat strategies, varying from warfare to biopolitical control, are articulated as social demands and as individualized tasks of inclusion to the ideological space of the West and the sovereign space of western nation states. The critical study of the particular documentaries aims at highlighting the regressive and character of the passionate discourses of far right media, in relation to the political crisis that liberal democracies across the world are facing.
Keywords: documentary, far right, war on terror, identity, politics, discourse, biopolitics
References (53)
Appadurai, Arjun. 2006. Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bolter, Jay D., and Richard Grusin. 2000. Remediation; Understanding the New Media. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Croft, Stuart. 2006. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. New York: Routledge.
Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Pres.
Kress, Gunther, and Teo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy; Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
. 2005. “Populism: what’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. by Panizza, Francisco, 32—49. London: Verso.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publications.
Lentin, Alana, and Gavan Titley. 2011. The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.
Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes. Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milonas, Yiannis. 2007. “Crisis, Conspiracy and Rights: Imaginaries of Terrorism in Documentary Film”. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1 (2): 96—117.
Mumford, Lewis. 2005/1967. The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development. Thessaloniki: Nissides.
Ong, Aihwa. 2002. “A Multitude of Spaces: Radical versus Moderate Islam. In “9/11 and the risks of hegemony: global emergency or false alarm?” AAA Meetings, New Orleans Nov. 21, 2002. Accessed June 27, 2012. http://www.anthropology.emory.edu/FACULTY/ANTBK/files/AAA%20Ong%20Revised.PDF
Price, Stuart. 2011. Worst Case Scenario? Governance, Mediation and the Security Regime. London: Zed Books.
Titscher, Stefan, Michael, Meyer, Ruth, Wodak, and Eva Vetter. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Crowley, Bill
McKinnon, Sara
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
