Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:3 (2012) ► pp.382–404

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Not just any order!

Revealing identity constructions of Muslims in the Mohammad cartoons

Published online: 26 November 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.04joe
The article analyses how the Mohammad cartoons enforced stereotypes of Muslims. It provides in-depth analysis of the cartoons based on opinion material from public debate and cognitive discourse analysis of “common sense knowledge”. The article shows that the main themes of interpretation were Muslim male and female identities. These were presented in a stereotypical way, downplaying agency and critical reflection among Muslim believers. Moreover, many citizens pointed out similarities between the Abrahamic religions. Such interpretations may be traced to mental models that perceived the cartoons as either humorous, a matter of Freedom of speech, or as an expression of values supportive to multiculturalism. Thereby the public debate drew on discourses about terrorism, veiling, child marriages, mother tongue education, and Turkey’s possible EU-accession. In general, the cartoons as well as the public debate about them enforced new racist ideas of Muslims.
References (42)
References
Alhassan, Amin. 2008. “The Twelve Cartoons. A Discursive Inquiry.” In Transnational Media Events, ed. by Eide Kunelius and Phillips. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andreassen, Rikke. 2005. Gender, Race, Sexuality and Nationality. Ph.D. dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Missing Links in Mainstream CDA: Modules, Blends and the Critical Instinct.” In A New Research Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton, 19—52. Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2004. “Watching September 11: The Politics of Pity.” Discourse & Society 15 (2): 185—198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dansk Oplagsbulletin [Bulletin of the Danish Audit Bureau of Circulations] 2005.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2000. “Ideologies, Racism, Discourse: Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues.” In Comparative Perspectives on Racism, ed. by ter Wal and Verkuyten, 91—116. London: Ashgate Pub Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production.” In A New Research Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Wodak and Chilton, 71—100. Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eriksen, Jens-Martin, and Frederik Stjernfelt. 2008. Adskillelsens politik. Multikulturalisme —ideologi og virkelighed. Copenhagen: Lindhardt & Ringhof. Ethnicities, ed. by Lindekilde, Lasse E, Mouritsen, Per and Zapato-Barrero, Ricard. Vol. 91, no. 3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way we Think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gad, Ulrik Pram. 2010. (How) can They Become Like Us? Danish Identity Politics and the Conflict of Muslim Relations. Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Hansen, Lene. 2011. “Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (1): 51—74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and the Cognitive Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hervik, Peter. 2002. Mediernes muslimer. Copenhagen: Nævnet for etnisk ligestilling.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Annoying Difference. New York: Berghahn Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holly, Werner. 2008. “Tabloidisation of Political Communication in the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 317—341. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hussain, Mustafa. 2003. “Media Representation of Ethnicity and the Institutional Discourse.” In Medierne, minoriteterne og det multikulturelle samfund. Skandinaviske perspektiver, ed. by Tufte, 115—132. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “La controvèrsia de les vinyetes de Mahoma els mitjans de comunicaciao a Dinamarca.” Quaderns del CAC 271: 47—58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Brian. 2008. Religion som fremmedhed i dansk politik. En sammenligning af italesættelser af jøder i Rigsdagstidende 1903—45 og muslimer i Folketingstidende 1967—2005. Ph.D. dissertation. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Jerichow, Anders, and Mille Rode. 2006. Profet-affæren. Copenhagen: Danish PEN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Signe Kjær. 2010. “Interviewet og hvad så? En kritisk analyse af Asmaa AbdolHamids betingelser for selvfremstilling.” Tidsskrift for islamforskning 4 (2): 77—103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klausen, Jytte. 2009. The Cartoons that Shook the World. New Haven: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W., and Donna E. Webster. 1996. “Motivated Closing of the Mind: “seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review 103 (2): 263—283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunelius, Risto (ed.) 2007. Reading the Mohammed Cartoons Controversy. Bochum: Projekt Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2000. “Visual Racism.” In The Semiotics of Racism, ed. by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak, 333—350.Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practise. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindekilde, Lasse E. 2008. Contested Caricatures: Dynamics of Muslim Claims-makingduring the Muhammad Caricatures Controversy. Ph.D. dissertation. Florence: European University Institute.
Lund, Anker Brink, Nielsen, Anders Hvass, and Sys Vestergaard. 2002. Etniske minoriteter i dansk journalistik. Working paper, Department for Journalism, University of Southern Denmark. (unpublished)
Lægaard, Sune. 2009. “Normative Interpretations of Diversity: The Danish Cartoons Controversy and the Importance of Context.” Ethnicities 9 (3): 314—333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1962. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Marion G., and Esra Özcan. 2007. “The Political Iconography of Muhammad Cartoons: Understanding Cultural Conflict and Political Action.” PS Political Studies 401: 287—291.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oehlenschläger, Adam. 1965. Aladdin eller den forunderlige lampe. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Michael. 2001. Stereotyping. The Politics of Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Klaus, and Mikael Rothstein. 2006. Bomben i turbanen. Espergærde: Tiderne Skifter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, Garbi. 2007. Muslim i Danmark — muslim i verden. Uppsala, Uppsala Universitetstryckeriet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stage, Carsten. 2009. Et andet Danmark. Konstruktionen af national identitet under tegningekrisen. Ph.D. dissertation. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2006. “Den dobbelte metonymi: Muhammed og Fogh karikeret -en komparativ analyse. ” Kritik 38 (179): 42—52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Ferruh. 2006. Ethnicized Ontologies. From Foreign Worker to Muslim Immigrant. Ph.D. Dissertation. San Diego, California: University of California.
Warburg, Margit, and others. 2009. Rapport om brugen af niqab og burka. Department for Cross Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigrant Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83—118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and John E. Richardson. 2009. “The Impact of Visual Racism. Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties. Controversia 6 (2): 45—77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Zeng, Lei & Xinyu Zhu
2024. Constructing cultural identities through new media: a multimodal appraisal analysis of Chinese web-based ink and wash cartoons. Semiotica 2024:259 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Khan, Muhammad Khalil, Fei Wu, Cornelius B. Pratt & Nadeem Akhtar
2021. Satires, narratives and journalistic divides: Discourses on free speech in Western and Islamic news media. The Social Science Journal 58:4 ► pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
Sadam Issa
2016. Picturing the Charlie Hebdo Incident in Arabic Political Cartoons. Arab Studies Quarterly 38:3 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue